Back to Basics: -What Is Inclusive Growth? by Ruchir Agarwal

Source details

Inclusive growth seeks to boost national wealth and well-being while reducing poverty, ensuring equity across generations, and preserving economic freedoms.
Different interpretations of freedom:
- Libertarian: minimal state intervention in private lives and free markets.
- Capabilities approach (Amartya Sen): presence of opportunities to be healthy, educated, and secure, not just absence of restrictions.
Every policy choice involves trade-offs between wealth creation, equality, and freedom.

Policy thought experiment: flat income tax of 30 percent for all versus increasing the tax rate for the richest to 50 percent.
Interpretations:
- Oppose tax increase: conservative approach prioritizing economic freedom and growth; favor uniform tax.
- Support tax increase with revenue targeted to poverty reduction: broader inclusive-growth perspective willing to trade some economic freedom for anti-poverty initiatives.
- Support tax increase to reduce wealth inequality regardless of revenue use: progressive stance, beyond traditional inclusive growth boundaries.
Related policy options and viewpoints:
- Universal basic income (UBI) paired with a flat income tax (as proposed by Milton Friedman and Gregory Mankiw).
- Progressive economists (Thomas Piketty; Green New Deal-style proposals) sometimes endorse high marginal tax rates, often of 70 percent or more, in part to reduce wealthy political influence.
- Dani Rodrik and others focus on concentration of wealth and innovation in selected firms and cities; proposed remedies include more labor rights, antitrust laws, higher minimum wages, subsidies, and industrial policies aimed at job creation in neglected areas.
Concerns and counterarguments:
- Risks to growth and implementation capacity from industrial policies.
- Potential shift toward protectionist trade.

Key question: how far should government intervene to ensure prosperity for children, grandchildren, and other species?
Climate-change policy thought experiment: a carbon tax proposal of $35 a metric ton intended to significantly cut future carbon emissions.
- Projected effect: raise costs on electricity, gasoline, and heating by about 20 percent for everyone.
Interpretations:
- Oppose tax: prioritize current economic growth and freedoms; emphasize immediate economic impact on poorer households and hesitancy in some developing economies.
- Support tax: prioritize well-being of future generations; align with carbon pricing policies considered by several advanced economies.
- Support tax on broader conservation grounds: value intrinsic worth of nature and biodiversity beyond human-centric benefits.
Trade-off highlighted: balancing present economic comfort against long-term sustainability and existential risks.

Public goods include education, health care, and nonmarket well-being elements (e.g., clean air) not measured in GDP.
Market failures can arise from externalities (e.g., polluters not paying for environmental damage) and underinvestment in education and health care.
In developing economies, government intervention may be more necessary due to poor infrastructure and limited access to quality services.
Views on government capability:
- Proponents: government can correct market imbalances and achieve social goals.
- Skeptics: fear government failure, corruption, and unintended worsening of problems; favor market-based solutions (e.g., Ronald Coase’s emphasis on clear property rights and minimal transaction costs).
Choice reflects trust in government versus faith in markets.

Inclusive growth emphasizes creating a level playing field where futures are determined by talent and effort rather than birth circumstances.
Distinct from policies solely aimed at reducing wealth inequality; focuses on equal opportunities alongside wealth creation and economic freedom.
The government’s role depends on individual values, trust in political actors, and local realities.

Trade-offs frequently posed:
- Economic freedom and growth versus redistribution and poverty reduction.
- Present consumption and living standards versus investments for future generations and environmental conservation.
- Market solutions versus government intervention to provide public goods and address externalities.
Policy levers discussed:
- Tax policy choices (flat tax at 30 percent, higher marginal rates for the wealthy including proposals to 50 percent and marginal tax rates of 70 percent or more).
- Universal basic income versus targeted anti-poverty programs.
- Carbon pricing (example: $35 a metric ton carbon tax with ~20 percent increase in energy costs).
- Labor rights, antitrust enforcement, minimum wages, subsidies, and industrial policies to address geographic and firm-level concentration.

Back to Basics: -What Is Inclusive Growth? — Ruchir Agarwal, March 2024

Back to Basics: What Is Inclusive Growth?
- Back to Basics: What Is Inclusive Growth? (Markdown version)
- Back to Basics: What Is Inclusive Growth? (PDF)