Can Budget Institutions Counteract Political Indiscipline?
IMF Working Papers, May 1, 2006
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Can Budget Institutions Counteract Political Indiscipline?
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Ashoka Mody, Stefania Fabrizio
- Published: May 1, 2006
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451863833.001
Summary findings
- "The budget is an expression of political rather than economic priorities."
- For a group of new and potential members of the European Union, the authors find that "politics dominates."
- Contemporary democratic practices can increase budget deficits through:
- ideological preferences;
- more fragmented government coalitions; and
- higher voter participation.
- Long-term structural forces—triggered by societal divisions and representative electoral rules—have more ambiguous implications but "also appear to increase budget pressures."
- The most robust finding: "budget institutions—mechanisms and rules of the budget process—that create checks and balances have significant value even when the politics is representative but undisciplined, and when long-term structural forces are unfavorable."
Analysis themes and mechanisms
- Political drivers of fiscal outcomes:
- Ideological preferences shape budget priorities.
- Government fragmentation (coalitional government) is associated with larger deficits.
- Voter turnout (voter turnover / higher voter participation) can increase budgetary pressures.
- Structural forces:
- Ethnic fractionalization and representative electoral rules are long-term structural factors linked to fiscal pressures.
- Implications of structural forces are described as "ambiguous" but tending toward increased budget pressures in the authors' findings.
- Institutional countermeasures:
- Budget institutions (rules and procedures of the budget process) function as checks and balances.
- These institutions retain significant value under undisciplined representative politics and unfavorable structural conditions.
Policy implications and recommendations (implicit in findings)
- Strengthen budget institutions—procedural rules and mechanisms that create checks and balances—to mitigate politically driven fiscal indiscipline.
- Pay attention to political structure factors (government fragmentation, electoral rules) when designing fiscal rules and PFM reforms.
- Recognize that higher voter participation and ideological competition can exacerbate deficits; institutional design should aim to anchor fiscal outcomes despite these democratic dynamics.
Scope, topics, and keywords
- Subject: Budget planning and preparation; Expenditure; Fiscal policy; Fiscal stance; Labor; Public debt; Public financial management (PFM); Unemployment rate.
- Keywords: Baltics; budget institutions; Budget planning and preparation; Central and Eastern Europe; coalitional government; Eastern Europe; electoral rules; ethnic fractionalization; finance minister; Fiscal policy; Fiscal stance; General government expenditure; government fragmentation; government ideology; institutions index; least squares; political economy; Unemployment rate; voter turnover; WP.