A Framework for Estimating Health Spending in Response to COVID-19
IMF Working Papers, July 24, 2020
Source details
- Canonical URL
- A Framework for Estimating Health Spending in Response to COVID-19
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Paolo Dudine, Klaus-Peter Hellwig, Samir Jahan
- Published: July 24, 2020
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513550220.001
Summary
- Objective: Estimate the additional health spending necessary to treat COVID-19 patients.
- Approach: Expand a Susceptible Infected Recovered model to project the number of people requiring hospitalization; combine projected demand with information about healthcare costs by country and assumptions about capacity constraints in the health sector.
- Core comparative scenarios:
- No social distancing and lockdowns.
- Capacity-constrained health systems with effective social distancing and quarantine.
Modeling and assumptions
- Epidemiological model: Extended Susceptible Infected Recovered framework to project hospitalizations.
- Costing: Use country-level information about healthcare costs to translate projected hospitalizations into spending needs.
- Capacity constraints: Explicit assumptions about health sector capacity determine whether systems must expand to meet demand or whether unmet demand affects outcomes (fatalities and spending).
Key quantitative findings
- Health system expansion requirement (no social distancing/lockdowns):
- "Countries would need to expand health systems ten-fold, on average, to assist all COVID-19 patients in need of hospitalization."
- Global additional health spending estimates:
- Without effective distancing: additional spending range of $0.6–1 trillion globally.
- With capacity constraints and effective social distancing and quarantine: additional spending reduced to $130–231 billion globally.
- Fatality rate estimates (average):
- Without distancing: fatality rate of 1.2 percent, on average.
- With capacity constraints plus effective social distancing and quarantine: fatality rate of 0.2 percent, on average.
Policy implications and interpretation
- Social distancing and quarantine substantially reduce both additional health spending and average fatality rates:
- Spending impact: from $0.6–1 trillion down to $130–231 billion.
- Fatality impact: from 1.2 percent down to 0.2 percent.
- Capacity planning: Without mitigation measures, health systems would face an average ten-fold increase in required capacity to meet hospitalization needs, implying large-scale, rapid expansion of infrastructure, personnel, and resources would be necessary.
Content in this bundle
- Working Paper