Update Financing the Fund's Participation in the HIPC Initiative and the Continuation of the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility,
April 20, 2001

Debt Initiative for the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPCs) A Factsheet

Debt Relief for Low-Income Countries The Enhanced HIPC Initiative

Overview: Transforming the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility (ESAF) and the Debt Initiative for the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPCs)

The Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) Operational Issues

Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers Operational Issues

Financial Organization and Operations of the IMF

Gold in the IMF



Financial Assistance for the IMF's Poorest Members

April 3, 2000

The IMF provides financial assistance to low-income members in two ways: through concessional lending under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) and through debt relief under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative. Recently, both the HIPC Initiative and the PRGF have been strengthened significantly. The HIPC Initiative has been enhanced to provide deeper, broader, and quicker debt relief, and the PRGF has been modified to increase its focus on poverty reduction and lasting economic growth.

The HIPC Initiative is designed to reduce the external debt burden of eligible countries to sustainable levels1, enabling them to service their external debts without the need for further debt relief and without compromising growth. Launched in 1996, the Initiative marked the first time that multilateral, Paris Club, and other official and bilateral creditors united to take this kind of comprehensive approach to debt relief. Assistance under the HIPC Initiative is limited to countries that are eligible for PRGF and International Development Association (IDA) loans and that:

  • have established strong track records of policy performance under PRGF- and IDA-supported programs but;
  • are not expected to achieve a sustainable debt situation after full use of traditional debt-relief mechanisms.2

A strong track record of policy implementation is intended to ensure that debt relief is put to effective use. Currently, 80 members of the IMF are PRGF-eligible (Table 1). While the qualification of these members for the HIPC Initiative is determined on a case-by-case basis, the enhancements to the Initiative could allow as many as 36 IMF members to qualify for assistance (Table 2).

The IMF supports the economic adjustment and reform efforts of its low-income members through the PRGF, which provides loans at an annual interest rate of ½ of 1 percent with repayment periods of 5 ½ - 10 years. The PRGF—which incorporates recommendations from past evaluations of the IMF’s concessional lending facility—is designed to make poverty-reduction programs a key element of a growth-oriented strategy.3 Programs supported by the PRGF are framed around a comprehensive, nationally-owned poverty reduction strategy, the costs of which are fully incorporated into the macroeconomic framework. In the case of HIPC-eligible members, this tightens the link between resources made available by debt relief and additional poverty reduction efforts.


Table 1. PRGF-Eligible Countries

1. Afghanistan

41. Kyrgyz Republic

2. Albania

42. Lao, P.D.R.

3. Angola

43. Lesotho

4. Armenia

44. Liberia

5. Azerbaijan

45. Macedonia, F.Y.R.

6. Bangladesh

46. Madagascar

7. Benin

47. Malawi

8. Bhutan

48. Maldives

9. Bolivia

49. Mali

10. Bosnia and Herzegovina

50. Mauritania

11. Burkina Faso

51. Moldova

12. Burundi

52. Mongolia

13. Cambodia

53. Mozambique

14. Cameroon

54. Myanmar

15. Cape Verde

55. Nepal

16. Central African Republic

56. Nicaragua

17. Chad

57. Niger

18. China, People’s Republic of

58. Nigeria

19. Comoros

59. Pakistan

20. Congo, Democratic Republic of the

60. Rwanda

21. Congo, Republic of

61. Samoa

22. Côte d’Ivoire

62. São Tomé and Príncipe

23. Djibouti

63. Senegal

24. Dominica

64. Sierra Leone

25. Egypt

65. Solomon Islands

26. Equatorial Guinea

66. Somalia

27. Eritrea

67. Sri Lanka

28. Ethiopia

68. St. Lucia

29. Gambia, The

69. St. Vincent and the Grenadines

30. Georgia

70. Sudan

31. Ghana

71. Tajikistan

32. Grenada

72. Tanzania

33. Guinea

73. Togo

34. Guinea-Bissau

74. Tonga

35. Guyana

75. Uganda

36. Haiti

76. Vanuatu

37. Honduras

77. Vietnam

38. India

78. Yemen, Republic of

39. Kenya

79. Zambia

40. Kiribati

80. Zimbabwe

 

 


Table 2. Expected Beneficiaries of the Enhanced HIPC Initiative

Decision points reached
or expected by end-2000

Decision points expected for
2001 or later

Benin1/ Burundi
Bolivia 2/ Central African Republic 6/
Burkina Faso 4/ Congo, Dem. Rep.
Cameroon Congo, Rep.
Chad Ethiopia
C^ te d’Ivoire 4/ Liberia
Ghana 5/ Madagascar
Guyana 3/ Myanmar
Guinea Niger
Guinea-Bissau Sn o TomJ and Principe
Honduras 6/ Sierra Leone
Lao People’s Dem. Rep. 5/ Somalia
Malawi Sudan
Mali 4/ Togo 6/
Mauritania 7/  
Mozambique 3/  
Nicaragua  
Rwanda  
Senegal 1/  
Tanzania  
Uganda 2/  
Zambia  


1/ Countries not requiring assistance under original HIPC Initiative but now eligible for reconsideration for assistance under the enhanced HIPC Initiative.
2/ Countries that received assistance under the original HIPC Initiative (i.e., have reached the completion point) and have qualified for additional assistance under the enhanced HIPC Initiative.
3/ Countries that have already received assistance under the original HIPC Initiative (i.e., have reached the completion point) and that are expected to qualify for additional assistance under the enhanced HIPC Initiative.
4/ Countries to which assistance had been committed under the original HIPC Initiative (i.e., had reached decision point).
5/ Countries that have indicated that they do not want to be considered for assistance under the enhanced HIPC Initiative.
6/ Countries that would benefit from assistance under the enhanced HIPC Initiative but that were considered unlikely to benefit from original HIPC assistance.
7/ Reached its decision point in February 2000 under the enhanced HIPC Initiative.

 

Concessional lending under the current PRGF is provided by the PRGF Trust, which

  • borrows resources at market-related interest rates from central banks, governments, and government institutions and lends them on a pass-through basis to PRGF-eligible borrowers;
  • receives contributions used to subsidize the rate of interest on PRGF loans and;
  • maintains a Reserve Account that provides security to lenders by meeting the obligations of the Trust to them in the event of non-payment by PRGF borrowers.

The resources of the Reserve Account are derived mainly from IMF gold sales initiated in the mid-1970s, and the investment income thereon. Reserve Account resources cannot be used for other purposes without the unanimous consent of all 16 lenders.4

 

Financing Needs of the HIPC and PRGF Initiatives

In order to participate in the HIPC Initiative and continue PRGF lending the IMF requires resources to provide grants to qualified members under the HIPC Initiative and subsidy and loan resources to support concessional PRGF lending. The subsidy resources are needed to cover the difference between the market-related interest paid to providers of PRGF loan resources and the highly concessional interest rate paid by PRGF borrowers. Since the HIPC Initiative and the PRGF are so closely interrelated and the current PRGF is expected to have resources only through 2000, the Fund has sought to mobilize resources for these initiatives at the same time. These resources are administered by the IMF under the PRGF-HIPC Trust, established in February 1997.

The HIPC Initiative

Enhancements to the HIPC Initiative to provide deeper, broader, and quicker debt relief increased substantially the costs of the Initiative and accelerated the timeframe for obtaining the needed resources. The total cost of the enhanced HIPC framework is estimated at US$27.4 billion in 1998 net present value (NPV) terms5; the IMF’s share of these costs is estimated at US$2.3 billion in NPV terms.6

Under the enhanced HIPC Initiative framework, the IMF and the World Bank determine the qualification of a member and the amount of assistance to be provided at the decision point—the point when the member completes its first (three-year) record of good policy performance under programs supported by the IMF and the World Bank. The decision point also marks the point at which the IMF commits the amount of HIPC assistance. A qualified member may receive interim assistance of up to 60 percent of the determined amount of HIPC assistance between the decision point and the completion point—the point when the member has fulfilled all policy-related conditions for HIPC assistance. Remaining HIPC Initiative assistance committed at the decision point is delivered at the completion point.

The IMF, as Trustee of the PRGF-HIPC Trust, provides its share of assistance under the HIPC Initiative to qualified members in the form of grants, which are used to help meet debt service payments to the IMF. Between the decision point and the completion point, interim assistance is provided in annual installments in the form of grants deposited to an account of the member administered by the IMF. These resources are used to help meet debt service payments to the IMF as they fall due. The member’s account earns interest on any positive balance during the interim period. At the completion point, the IMF deposits the remaining amount of undisbursed assistance to the member’s account, as well as interest on amounts committed but not disbursed during the interim period. After the completion point is reached, the member will continue to draw on the resources of its account to help meet debt service payments to the IMF according to a schedule agreed by the IMF and the member.

Continuation of PRGF lending

The framework for the PRGF envisages operations under the current facility through 2000, to be followed by a four-year interim PRGF starting in 2001 with a commitment capacity of US$1.4 billion per year. Financing possibilities for concessional lending for the period after 2004 would need to be re-assessed closer to the time, but a substantial proportion of such financing would be provided by the IMF’s own resources accumulating in the PRGF Trust Reserve Account. These resources will become available as PRGF lenders are repaid and the security provided by the Reserve Account is no longer needed.

The subsidy needs of the interim PRGF, estimated at US$1.2 billion in NPV terms, are included in the financing requirements of the PRGF-HIPC Trust.7 The loan resources of US$5–6 billion for the interim PRGF will be sought from bilateral lenders, including current loan providers to the PRGF Trust.

 

Financing the HIPC and PRGF Initiatives: A Status Update

In September 1999, agreement was reached on the main elements of a financing package that will enable the IMF to make its contribution to the costs of the HIPC Initiative and continue concessional lending for sustainable growth and poverty reduction in low-income IMF member countries. Since then, the IMF has made substantial progress in securing the needed financing. The total cost to the IMF of these initiatives is estimated at US$3.5 billion in NPV terms, with the HIPC Initiative accounting for two-thirds of the total financing requirements (Table 3). The main elements of the financing package comprise contributions by member countries and by the IMF itself.

Member Country Contributions

Bilateral pledges from member countries amount to about US$1.4 billion in NPV terms and come from a wide cross-section of the IMF's membership, demonstrating the broad support for the HIPC and PRGF initiatives. Altogether, 93 member countries have pledged their support: 27 industrial countries; 57 developing countries, of which 6 are low-income countries that have had PRGF-supported programs in the past; and 9 countries in transition. To make their contributions, many members intend to use resources derived from their participation in the Second Special Contingent Account 2 (SCA-2), one of the IMF’s precautionary balances that has been liquidated.

IMF Contributions

The IMF's own contributions will amount to US$2.1 billion in NPV terms. The bulk of this, US$1.6 billion in NPV terms, will come from investment income on the profits generated from off-market transactions in gold of up to 14 million troy ounces. A substantial part of resources originating from off-market gold transactions will be placed in the Special Disbursement Account (SDA) and invested for the benefit of the HIPC Initiative.


 Table 3. Total IMF Financing Requirements and Sources of
Financing for the HIPC and PRGF Initiatives

In billions of US$

(end-1998 NPV) 1/

Total IMF financing requirements

3.5

Cost of the HIPC Initiative to the IMF

2.3

Subsidy requirement for the PRGF

1.2

 

 

Sources of financing

3.5

 

 

Bilateral contributions

1.4

 

 

IMF contributions

2.1

 

 

Investment income from off-market gold

 

transactions of up to 14 million ounces

1.6

 

 

Other contributions by the IMF 2/

0.5


1/ Assumes an average exchange rate of SDR 1 = US$1.4 over the relevant horizon.
2/ Transfers to the PRGF-HIPC Trust from the PRGF Trust Reserve Account equivalent to the cost of administering the PRGF Trust for FY 1998-2004 plus transfers of part of the interest surcharge on certain Supplemental Reserve Facility purchases (see Appendices III and IX of the 1999 IMF Annual Report).

 

Off-Market Transactions in Gold

Off-market transactions in gold by the IMF entail separate but closely linked transactions between the IMF and member countries that have financial obligations falling due to the IMF.

  • In the first step, the IMF sells gold to a member at the prevailing market price. The difference between SDR 35 per troy ounce of gold and the actual sale price is placed in the Special Disbursement Account (SDA) and invested for the benefit of the HIPC Initiative. The investment income will only be transferred to the PRGF-HIPC Trust (HIPC sub-account) when it is needed.
  • In the second step, immediately following the first, the IMF accepts, at the same market price, the same amount of gold from the member in settlement of that member’s financial obligations falling due to the IMF.

The net effect of these transactions leaves the IMF’s holdings of physical gold unchanged. No gold is released to the market, and thus there is no impact on the balance of supply and demand in the market.

The IMF’s gold holdings accepted in settlement of members’ obligations will be recorded at a higher value in the IMF’s balance sheet. Acceptance of this gold (instead of currencies or SDRs) will reduce the IMF’s liquidity as well as its net income. For the current fiscal year, the Executive Board decided to absorb the loss of net income through a reduced build up of reserves. In future years, choices will have to be made among lowering the build up of reserves, increasing the rate of charge (interest paid by borrowers from the IMF), and/or reducing the rate of remuneration (interest paid to creditors to the IMF).

 

The IMF will also contribute about US$500 million in NPV terms by foregoing compensation for the cost of administrative expenses related to PRGF operations for the financial years 1998 through 2004 with the equivalent amount transferred from the PRGF Reserve Account to the PRGF-HIPC Trust, and by transferring to the PRGF-HIPC Trust part of the interest surcharge on certain outstanding purchases under the Supplemental Reserve Facility related to activation of the New Arrangements to Borrow.

On December 8, 1999, the IMF Executive Board took the decisions needed to enable the IMF to complete its contributions to the PRGF-HIPC Trust, including approval of plans to undertake off-market gold transactions of up to 14 million ounces and to terminate the IMF’s Second Special Contingency Account (SCA-2). The off-market gold transactions are expected to be completed by early April 2000. Investment income (of up to US$1.6 billion in NPV terms) from the resources generated by these transactions will be used to provide debt relief under the HIPC Initiative. So far, the IMF’s Executive Board has authorized the transfer of nine-fourteenths of the investment income to be used for this purpose. The transfer of the remaining five-fourteenths requires a decision by the IMF’s Executive Board with an 85 percent majority. Further legislation by the United States Congress is necessary for the Executive Director of the United States to support such a decision. The decisions needed to complete the financing package are expected to be taken in the spring of 2000. Without these final steps, there will be a shortfall in resources available for debt relief under the HIPC Initiative of about US$560 million in NPV terms.

The IMF has received substantial bilateral contributions since December 8, in part facilitated by the termination of the SCA-2. This has permitted the IMF to move ahead with early cases under the enhanced HIPC Initiative. The IMF has already committed assistance under the enhanced framework to three member countries (Bolivia, Mauritania, and Uganda), including the provision of interim assistance in the case of Uganda (Table 4). It is expected that another 20 or so countries will reach decision points in 2000.

The commitment to deliver broader, deeper, and faster debt relief under the enhanced HIPC Initiative can be kept only if there are firm prospects that the required resources will be available when they need to be delivered. Without such firm prospects, commitments of HIPC assistance would be halted at an early stage of implementation of the enhanced framework. It is therefore imperative that all bilateral donors honor their funding commitments without delay and to obtain approval of the transfer of the remaining investment income on the resources generated from gold sales.

Table 4. Commitments and Disbursements of HIPC Assistance

Status as of March 27, 2000


Member

Decision Point

Completion Point

Amount Committed

Amount Disbursed

Amount Committed

Amount Disbursed


(In millions of SDRs)

(In millions of US$)

Bolivia

Sept. 1997

Sept. 1998

21.2

21.2

29.0

29.0

Bolivia

Feb. 2000 1/

Floating

41.1

0

55.0

0

Burkina Faso

Sept. 1997

7.0

0

9.6

0

Cote d'Ivoire

Mar. 1998

14.4

0

22.5

0

Guyana

Dec. 1997

May 1999

25.6

25.6

34.5

34.5

Mali

Sept. 1998

9.2

0

14.0

0

Mauritania

Feb. 2000

Floating

34.8

0

46.8

0

Mozambique

Apr. 1998

June 1999

93.2

93.2

124.6

124.6

Uganda

Apr. 1997

Apr. 1998

51.5

51.5

68.9

68.9

Uganda

Feb. 2000 1/

Floating

68.1

5.6

91.0

7.5





8 members

366.1

197.1

495.9

264.5


1/ Second decision point under the enhanced HIPC Initiative.

 

Operational features of the PRGF-HIPC Trust

When the PRGF-HIPC Trust was established in 1997, it was envisaged that financial contributions could be earmarked for either PRGF subsidies or HIPC operations. To permit such earmarking, three separate sub-accounts have been established as illustrated in Chart 1:

  • the HIPC sub-account for resources earmarked for HIPC operations;
  • the PRGF sub-account for resources earmarked for interim PRGF subsidy operations; and
  • the PRGF-HIPC sub-account for unearmarked resources.

Resources earmarked for the HIPC sub-account include investment income on the profits derived from off-market gold transactions and bilateral contributions from Australia, Finland, and the United States. Together these earmarked resources amount to US$1.9 billion in NPV terms, compared to total estimated HIPC costs of US$2.3 billion in NPV terms. Since expected HIPC costs exceed resources earmarked for HIPC, and the investment income on the profits derived from gold sales accrues only slowly over time, the structure of the Trust allows the HIPC sub-account to borrow resources from the PRGF-HIPC sub-account for HIPC operations.

All HIPC assistance provided by the PRGF-HIPC Trust is disbursed from the HIPC sub-account to the Initiative beneficiaries; HIPC assistance in the form of grants is transferred to the beneficiary country’s account managed by the IMF, as Trustee of the PRGF-HIPC Trust. The investment earnings on resources generated from gold sales held in the SDA will be made available to the HIPC sub-account to meet the costs of the HIPC Initiative. As the HIPC sub-account is replenished over time, it will repay the PRGF-HIPC sub-account. To preserve the value of resources for PRGF operations, the HIPC sub-account will pay interest on the use of resources of the PRGF-HIPC sub-account at a rate equal to the average return on investment of SDA resources.

Financial statements of the PRGF-HIPC Trust will be published. All transactions and each sub-account of the Trust will be separately disclosed in published financial statements. These accounts will be audited by the external audit firm selected under Section 20 of the IMF’s By-Laws, whose report, together with the financial statements, will be published in the IMF’s Annual Report.

 

Investment of PRGF, PRGF-HIPC, and SDA Resources

Until February 2000, the resources of the PRGF Trust, PRGF-HIPC Trust, and SDA resources had been invested in short-term deposits with the Bank for International Settlements. To boost the return on such investments—and thus the scope for assisting the poorest countries—beginning in March 2000, the resources will be diversified into longer-term government bonds and other medium-term instruments within the prudential constraints of the investment authorities for these trusts and the SDA.

 


1/ See David Andrews and others, Debt Relief for Low-Income Countries: The Enhanced HIPC Initiative, IMF Pamphlet Series No. 51, November 1999, for a comprehensive description of the HIPC Initiative.
2/ Performance under programs supported by emergency post-conflict assistance can be counted as part of the track record of policy performance.
3/ See Overview: Transforming the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility (ESAF) and the Debt Initiative for Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) on the IMF's website (http://www.imf.org).
4/ National Bank of Belgium, Government of Canada, Government of China, Central Bank of Egypt, Agence Française de Développement, Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (Germany), Bank of Italy, Japan Bank for International Cooperation, Bank of Korea, the Nederlandsche Bank, Bank of Norway, OPEC Fund for International Development, Bank of Spain, Government of Spain, Swiss Confederation, and the Swiss National Bank.
5/ All figures expressed in NPV terms refer to end-1998 net present values.
6/ These estimates excludes Liberia, Somalia, and Sudan, which have had large arrears on loans from the IMF as well as from other international creditors for many years. When these countries are in a position to clear these arrears, resolving the countries' debt situations will require an extraordinary support effort by the international community as a whole. Total costs to creditors in NPV terms including Liberia, Somalia, and Sudan are estimated at US$36 billion under the enhanced HIPC Initiative.
7/ The estimated subsidy requirements for the interim PRGF exclude subsidy needs associated with the possible use of the PRGF by Liberia, Somalia, and Sudan during the interim period.