View this Issue
Archive of F&D Issues
Subscribe to Print Edition
Write to us
F&D welcomes comments and brief letters, a selection of which are posted under Letters to the Editor. Letters may be edited. Please send your letters to: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Free Email Notification
Strengthening domestic revenue bases is key to creating fiscal space for Africa’s developmental needs
Financial flows to sub-Saharan Africa have increased sharply since 1980. Between 1980 and 2006, net aid (including debt relief) increased fivefold, remittances ninefold, and foreign direct investment fiftyfold. Increased resource flows into the region and the associated high growth rates have enabled these countries to scale up public spending, including on social sectors. As a result, education and health spending increased in the region’s oil-importing countries, in relation to both GDP and total spending (see Chart 1).
While these increases in spending are welcome, they are insufficient to meet the vast needs of the region’s population in a sustainable manner. It is therefore essential that donors live up to their commitments of increasing aid to these countries. But aid-receiving countries in the region could also do more to generate resources internally—and to ensure that both new and existing resources are used efficiently.
In this article, we propose expanding the tax base in these countries by capturing activities not adequately taxed because of policy or administrative weaknesses. Such a step—together with strengthened fiscal institutions—would hasten the progress of African countries toward achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and produce an array of other benefits. This does not mean that tax rates should be increased. In fact, high tax rates in some countries in the region, particularly on mobile production factors (such as skilled labor and capital), may be hindering economic growth. An effective broadening of the revenue base may enable these countries to lower the tax rates while raising more revenue to finance pressing developmental needs.
The case for domestic resources
Also, in many of Africa’s low-income oil importers, domestic revenue mobilization has not kept pace with rising public spending. As a result, a growing share of current spending is financed by aid. For example, from 1997–99 to 2004–06, the share of current spending financed by aid increased from 16 percent to 36 percent in Ghana, from 22 percent to 40 percent in Tanzania, and from 60 percent to 70 percent in Uganda (see Chart 2).
It is not inappropriate for low-income countries to finance a rising share of their recurrent outlays from aid, one might argue. After all, these countries have pressing needs at this stage of their development, and increasing expenditures for infrastructure and human development would only promote growth over time. Although this argument has some merit, policymakers in these countries still need to take into account a number of other considerations.
First, aid-financed projects give rise to additional spending, such as on operations and maintenance, which will need to be covered at least partly, if not wholly, from domestic resources. The country must generate sufficient revenue to finance these expenditures, or the productivity of aid-financed projects and assets will suffer.
Second, strengthened revenue mobilization contributes to economic stability, particularly in countries dependent on external financial flows. Rising domestic revenue not only creates additional fiscal space for supporting high-priority spending, it also allows a country to maintain spending consistent with its policy priorities when aid is phased out. Ghana, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda all successfully created fiscal space through higher domestic revenue mobilization during 2000–06, demonstrating that it is feasible. Moreover, as low-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa develop into emerging market countries, they will need to strengthen their revenue collection accordingly (see Chart 3).
Increased domestic revenue can also help countries mitigate the adverse impact of volatility and uncertainty in aid flows, which can complicate budgetary management. Aid flows are more volatile than domestic revenue and significantly more so than remittances, and this volatility has increased over time. For example, Bulír and Hamann (2007) find that, even for countries that have benefited from the IMF’s Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative, the relative volatility of aid with respect to revenue (when variables are expressed as a share of GDP) has increased to 62 in 2000–03, compared with only 25 during 1997–98.
Third, expanding domestic revenue could also help Africa address the challenges arising from globalization. These countries are feeling the pressure to further liberalize their trading regimes, because their average tariff rate is higher than in other regions. Also, tariff rates in sub-Saharan Africa are expected to fall as a result of the formation of free trade areas and customs unions within the region as well as with other regional trading blocks, including the European Union. Currently, about a third of nonresource tax revenue in the region comes from trade taxes—about 4 percent of GDP—indicating that revenue loss from further trade liberalization would be significant. Strengthening the domestic revenue base could help recoup at least some losses from trade taxes.
African countries are also confronted with increasing tax competition on corporate income tax (CIT), as countries compete more aggressively to attract foreign investment. Although statutory CIT rates in the region fell markedly in the 1990s, CIT revenue as a share of GDP has remained broadly unchanged, suggesting that the impact of rate reductions on revenue has been mitigated by other factors (Keen and Mansour, 2008). Nevertheless, the trend worldwide is toward lower statutory CIT rates, and rates in sub-Saharan African countries are still relatively high. This implies that these countries remain under pressure to further reduce CIT rates, which in turn means that the tax base should be broadened in order to minimize the impact on tax revenue.
Fourth, greater reliance on domestic revenues reduces the risk of Dutch disease, which occurs when the exchange rate appreciates as a result of capital inflows, making the country’s exports less competitive. A key challenge in managing scaled-up external inflows is the potential impact on the real exchange rate, exports, and competitiveness (Gupta, Powell, and Yang, 2006). Increasing domestic revenue means that there is less risk of being affected by Dutch disease.
Fifth, taxation increases incentives for public participation in the political process and creates pressure for more accountability, better governance, and improved efficiency of government spending. It fosters awareness to limit rent seeking (that is, lobbying for tax breaks or protection from foreign competition) in public policy by interest groups. Taxation also creates incentives for governments to upgrade their institutions for tax collection and administration and to provide more public services (Moore, 2007).
Sixth, domestic revenue mobilization can help strengthen fiscal institutions. Stable and predictable revenue facilitates medium-term fiscal planning, which can help ensure that resources are allocated to priority sectors and that these allocations are effectively translated into outcomes. In fact, the efficiency of social spending has a strong positive correlation with the quality of fiscal institutions (Gupta et al., 2008).
In low-income African countries, domestic revenue remains low, at about 16.5 percent of GDP. Tax revenue is about 14 percent of GDP on average. A tax-to-GDP ratio of at least 15 percent is considered a reasonable target for most low-income countries (Keen and Simone, 2004). Many low-income African countries that are not rich in resources have a tax-to-GDP ratio well below 15 percent of GDP (see Chart 4).
Several studies indicate that developing countries have the potential for greater domestic revenue mobilization. The United Nations Millennium Project (2005) estimated that these countries could increase their domestic revenue by about 4 percent of GDP over the next 10 years. Similarly, the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health (World Health Organization, 2002) concluded that most countries could raise an additional 1–2 percent of GDP for financing additional health spending.
What it will take
A value-added tax (VAT) has been introduced in virtually all countries in sub-Saharan Africa. To maximize revenue from VAT, countries need to ensure that the tax base is as broad as possible and the rate structure simple. Excise taxes are levied on products such as alcohol, tobacco, petroleum products, vehicles, and spare parts, but their yield in some countries has eroded because of rising prices. During 2007–08, many African countries reduced taxes (both import duties and consumption taxes) on fuel and food in response to higher international prices of these commodities. This has helped mitigate the impact of rising prices, particularly on the poor. But eventually, these countries would need to recoup some of the resulting revenue losses through rationalization of domestic taxation.
Rationalizing tax incentives can also generate substantial revenue (without negating the role of such incentives in improving the investment climate). Tax incentives in sub-Saharan Africa are now used more widely than in the 1980s, with more than two-thirds of the countries in the region providing tax holidays to attract investment. The number of countries using free zones that offer tax holidays has also dramatically increased. Moreover, low-income countries in the region use such incentives more extensively than do middle-income countries—yet foreign direct investment in sub-Saharan Africa, other than in the resource sector, has increased very little over the past two decades.
Such incentives not only shrink the tax base but also complicate tax administration and are a major source of revenue loss and leakage from the taxed economy. Because investment decisions depend on a host of factors that often carry more weight than tax incentives, these countries need to improve the business climate while keeping the tax considerations as neutral as possible for investors.
Countries should also take steps to strengthen tax administration, because weak administrative capacity and poor governance are important constraints to raising revenue in many countries. Policies should focus on strengthening the technical capacity and organization of revenue authorities through computerization and improved operating procedures. Stricter enforcement mechanisms as well as improved tax audits and inspections could also contribute to increased taxpayer compliance. Tanzania and Uganda, for instance, have succeeded in improving domestic revenue performance by strengthening tax administration.
Effective resource use
Countries can take a number of steps to strengthen their public financial management systems, such as putting in place an adequate and coherent accounting framework for tracking spending, enforcing accountability, and meeting fiduciary requirements; regular and timely fiscal reporting; and establishing a sound system of internal control to ensure that public expenditure is executed in accordance with the approved budget and the established regulatory framework.
Maximizing the benefits
Resources must also be managed efficiently so that the people of sub-Saharan Africa receive the maximum benefit. To this end, these countries must further strengthen institutions, in particular public financial management systems, which will cut down on waste and reduce the incidence of fund misappropriation by promoting transparency and enhancing governance. Countries should also develop appropriately sequenced reform plans for strengthening these systems, taking into account the local capacity to undertake the reforms.
Gupta, Sanjeev, Robert Powell, and Yongzheng Yang, 2006, Macroeconomic Challenges of Scaling Up Aid to Africa: A Checklist for Practitioners (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Gupta, Sanjeev, Gerd Schwartz, Shamsuddin Tareq, Richard Allen, Isabell Adenauer, Kevin Fletcher, and Duncan Last, 2008, Fiscal Management of Scaled-Up Aid (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Keen, Michael, and Mario Mansour, 2008, “Revenue Mobilization in Sub-Saharan Africa: Key Challenges from Globalization,” paper presented at the conference, “Globalization and Revenue Mobilization,” Abuja, Nigeria, February.
Keen, Michael, and Alejandro Simone, 2004, “Tax Policy in Developing Countries: Some Lessons for the 1990s and Some Challenges Ahead,” in Helping Countries Develop: The Role of Fiscal Policy, ed. by Sanjeev Gupta, Gabriela Inchauste, and Benedict Clements (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Moore, Mick, 2007, “How Does Taxation Affect the Quality of Governance?” Institute of Development Studies Working Paper 280 (Brighton, United Kingdom: Institute of Development Studies).
United Nations Millennium Project, 2005, Investing in Development: A Practical Plan to Achieve the Millennium Development Goals (New York: United Nations).
World Health Organization, 2002, Mobilization of Domestic Resources For Health, Report of Working Group 3 of the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health (Geneva: World Health Organization).