Listening to Social Silence
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Listening to Social Silence
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: GILLIAN TETT
- Published: December 2, 2021
Overview / Thesis
- Argument: Cultural anthropology is vital for policymaking; technical “hard” sciences alone are insufficient to address complex public policy challenges because culture—“the web of half-acknowledged rituals, symbols, ideas, spatial patterns, and social affiliations”—shapes human behavior.
- Key metaphor: Need “lateral vision” rather than tunnel vision; combine a worm’s-eye (bottom-up) view with a bird’s-eye (top-down) view to understand both the “noise” and the “silence” in societies.
- Author: GILLIAN TETT, trained as a cultural anthropologist, chairs the editorial board of the Financial Times, US, and is author of Anthro-Vision: A New Way to See in Business and Life.
- Publication context: F&D Magazine, December 2021.
Evidence from COVID-19 and Vaccination
- Timeline references: 2020 (vaccine development breakthroughs); 2021 (emerging cultural obstacles to vaccination).
- Findings:
- Vaccine distribution proved “lamentably—and dangerously—inequitable” because of global political economy structures.
- Cultural factors produced vaccine resistance (“hesitancy”), undermining pandemic control in some rich countries (example highlighted: United States).
- Even within high-income countries, cultural resistance complicated vaccine uptake and public health responses.
- Mask example:
- Anthropological insight: Mask wearing functions as a psychological prompt and a social signal of commitment to a group, beyond mere physical barrier properties.
- Policy observation: In the United Kingdom, early government discouragement of masks (and public shunning by leaders) undermined consistent messaging; later reversals showed delayed adaptation to cultural signals.
- Messaging:
- Early COVID-19 messaging relied heavily on scientists (“elite” voices); later shifts toward community voices acknowledged cultural resonance in persuasion.
Lessons from Ebola (2014)
- Year referenced: 2014.
- Case study findings:
- Initial Ebola responses failed when treatment centers featured opaque walls and messaging used language locals could not understand.
- Redesigning centers to be transparent and adapting messaging to local cultural contexts increased compliance with medical advice.
- Broader implication: Blending behavioral science, anthropology, medical science, and computing improved outcomes.
Implications for Climate Change, Energy, and Economic Policy
- Core point: Cultural context is crucial to mobilize public support for green policies and behavioral changes; technical models alone are insufficient.
- Renewable energy example:
- Western urban elites often view wind and solar as morally superior to fossil fuels, but this view can ignore local impacts—e.g., visual blight from wind turbines, loss of identity and livelihood in coal mining towns, and increased transportation costs for low-income households.
- Empathy for affected communities is necessary to design just transitions and avoid backlash.
- Policy implication: Policies need incentives and culturally resonant messaging to be effective across diverse populations.
Limits of Anthropology and Cautions
- Acknowledged limitations:
- Anthropology is mostly qualitative and its insights can be hard to scale.
- Cultural explanations can be difficult to communicate in policy settings and may lack quantitative precision.
- Clarification: The author does not advocate replacing economists, doctors, computer scientists, or financiers with anthropologists; rather, she urges integration.
Policy Recommendations / Practical Steps
- Adopt lateral vision: combine technical/scientific tools with social science perspectives to capture context and “social silences.”
- Use anthropological methods to:
- Listen to local voices and recognize hidden cultural assumptions (“a fish cannot see water”).
- Design public health interventions that incorporate social signals (e.g., masks as behavioral prompts).
- Tailor messaging to community norms and trusted messengers rather than relying solely on elite scientific voices.
- For climate and energy transitions:
- Build empathy into policy design to account for place-based identities, livelihoods, and distributional effects.
- Blend worm’s-eye and bird’s-eye analyses to align technical solutions with lived experiences.
Key Quotations and Terms Preserved
- “half-acknowledged rituals, symbols, ideas, spatial patterns, and social affiliations”
- “social silences”
- “lateral vision”
- “worm’s-eye view” and “bird’s-eye”
- “hesitancy” (used as a euphemism for vaccine resistance)
Gillian Tett, F&D Magazine, December 2021
Content in this bundle
- الاستماع إلى الصمت الاجتماعي
- Escuchar el silencio social ● Finanzas y Desarrollo ● Diciembre de 2021
- Les sciences sociales à l’écoute des silences sociaux
- Огромное значение антропологии для восстановления по принципу «сделать лучше, чем было»
- Listening to Social Silence
- 倾听未言之言 ●《金融与发展》● 2021年12月号