International Reserves: Precautionary vs. Mercantilist Views, Theory and Evidence

October 1, 2005

Preview Citation

Format: Chicago

Joshua Aizenman, and Jaewoo Lee. International Reserves: Precautionary vs. Mercantilist Views, Theory and Evidence, (USA: International Monetary Fund, 2005) accessed September 19, 2024

Disclaimer: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF.The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate

Summary

This paper compares the importance of precautionary and mercantilist motives in the hoarding of international reserves by developing countries. Overall, empirical results support precautionary motives; in particular, a more liberal capital account regime increases international reserves. Theoretically, large precautionary demand for international reserves arises as a self-insurance to avoid costly liquidation of long-term projects when the economy is susceptible to sudden stops. The welfare gain from the optimal management of international reserves is of a first-order magnitude, reducing the welfare cost of liquidity shocks from a first-order to a second-order magnitude.

Subject: Capital account liberalization, Export performance, International reserves, Liquidity, Reserves accumulation

Keywords: Precautionary demand, WP

Publication Details

Pages:

30
Volume:

---
DOI:

---
Issue:

---
Series:

Working Paper No. 2005/198
Stock No:

WPIEA2005198
ISBN:

9781451862171
ISSN:

1018-5941

FACTSHEETS

RESOURCES

TOPICS

Flagship Publications

Other Publications

IMF reports and publications by country

Regional Offices

All News

See Also

For Journalists

Press Center

RESOURCES

FLAGSHIPS

KEY SERIES

IMF NOTES

IMF Working Papers