CLIMATE CHANGE: RESILIENCE BUILDING
Source details
- Canonical URL
- CLIMATE CHANGE: RESILIENCE BUILDING
Other formats
Overview
- IMF staff are integrating the risks of climate change damages and natural disasters, along with the finance needed for mitigation and adaptation strategies, into their work with countries.
- Analysis of appropriate adaptation policies must be inherently local and customized to the evolving climate impact on specific regions or sectors, including resilience-building strategies to help prepare for and rebound from disasters.
- Developing country governments can face very large adaptation costs; the need for growth-enhancing scaled up infrastructure provides an opportunity for climate-resilient, low-carbon infrastructure spending.
- Management of adaptation spending, and of financial assistance for it, should be undertaken within a medium-term financial framework consistent with available resources, macro-stability, and debt sustainability.
Economic impacts and statistics
- In some countries, disaster-related economic losses have exceeded 200 percent of GDP (example cited when Hurricane Maria struck Dominica in 2017).
- The damage from the 2011 floods in Thailand amounted to around 10 percent of Thailand’s GDP.
- By some estimates, the total costs of the 2018 wildfires in California were up to $350 billion, or 1.7 percent of U.S. GDP.
- Over the past decade, direct damages from climatic disasters are estimated to add up to around US$ 1.3 trillion (or around 0.2% of world GDP on average, per year).
Policy and fiscal frameworks
- Adaptation and resilience-building should be integrated into medium-term financial frameworks to ensure consistency with available resources, macro-stability, and debt sustainability.
- There is an opportunity to align growth-enhancing infrastructure investment with climate-resilient, low-carbon objectives.
- IMF engagement recognizes policy trade-offs in building resilience to natural disasters and the need to strengthen fiscal frameworks and improve the spending mix, particularly in small and vulnerable states.
- Enhancing financial safety nets and tailored IMF support mechanisms for developing countries vulnerable to large natural disasters are part of the institutional response.
Assessment tools and institutional mechanisms
- The Climate-Climate Public Assessment (CCPA) is a joint IMF-World Bank assessment introduced on a pilot basis in 2017 that provides an overarching assessment of countries’ climate strategies as articulated in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and other government documents.
- CCPAs are intended to help countries build coherent macro-frameworks for responding to climate change, which could improve prospects for attracting external finance and put future revisions to NDCs on a sound footing.
Key messages and recommendations
- Adaptation policies must be locally customized to the evolving climate impacts on specific regions or sectors.
- Scale up climate-resilient, low-carbon infrastructure as part of growth-enhancing investment plans.
- Manage adaptation spending within medium-term financial frameworks that preserve macro-stability and debt sustainability.
- Use joint assessments like the CCPA to align national climate strategies with macro-fiscal planning and to improve prospects for external finance.
Content in this bundle
References