Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey Guide (Second Edition)--Contents

See Also:
IMF Statistical Topics

Portfolio Investment: Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey (CPIS): Background

Español (PDF)
Français (PDF)

Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey Guide (Second Edition)

May 10, 2002

Use the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view this PDF file (1,005 kb).

Tips for using PDF files

Ordering Information

Contents

Preface

IMF Task Force on the 2001 Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey: Terms of Reference and Membership

Glossary

1. Introduction

I. Purpose of the CPIS

II. Background

III. The 1997 CPIS

IV. The 2001 CPIS

V. Organization of the Survey Guide

2. Scope and Modalities

I. Scope of the CPIS

II. Modalities of the CPIS

III. Modalities of the SEFER

IV. Modalities of the SSIO

3. Concepts and Principles

I. Guidance to Compilers

II. Nomenclature

III. Country Attribution and Residence

IV. Valuation

V. Sectors

VI. Distinguishing Between Direct and Portfolio Investment
in Securities

VII. Treatment of Securities Where There Is Potential for Double Counting

VIII. Instruments

4. Collection Methods

I. Data Considerations

II. Choosing a Collection System

III. Securities Databases

IV. Reporting Thresholds

V. Third-Party Holdings Survey

VI. Conclusions

5. Other Practical Issues

I. Logistical Issues

II. Timetable

III. Legal and Confidentiality Considerations

IV. Compiling, Maintaining, and Using a Register of Respondents

V. Choosing and Developing a Computer Package to Process the Survey Results

VI. Quality Control

6. Experience in Conducting the 1997 CPIS

I. Coverage

II. Separating Direct Investment from Portfolio Investment

III. How Market Price Valuation Was Addressed

IV. Treatment of Accrued Interest

V. Treatment of Nominee Accounts

VI. Treatment of Collective Investment Schemes

VII. Direct Holdings Abroad

VIII. Quality Control

IX. Steps Taken to Address Low Coverage or Low
Response Rates

X. Sectoral Information

Appendices
	I.	Model Form for a Mixed Custodian/End-Investor Security-By-Security Survey
	II.	Model Form for an End-Investor Survey on an Aggregate Basis
	III.	Model Form for a Mixed Custodian/End-Investor Survey on an Aggregate Basis
	IV.	Model Form for an End-Investor Survey on an Aggregate Basis for a Small Economy with an International Financial Center (SEIFiC)
	V.	Model Form for a Mixed Custodian/End-Investor Survey on an Aggregate Basis for a Small Economy with an International Financial Center (SEIFiC)
	VI.	Definition and Description of Instruments
	VII.	International Securities Identification Number (ISIN) Code System

Boxes
	3.1.	Approaches to Approximating Market Prices
	3.2.	Valuation of Asset-Backed Securities
	3.3.	Austria’s Experience in Excluding Direct Investment from the National Survey Results
	3.4.	Statistical Treatment of Repurchase Agreements
	3.5.	Repurchase Agreements: Examples of International Position Data-Reporting Possibilities of Portfolio Investment
	3.6.	Example of a Reverse Repo Followed by Outright Sale
	3.7.	Treatment in 1997 CPIS of Financial Transactions That May Lead to Under- or Double Counting
	4.1.	Commercial Databases
	4.2.	The BIS Securities Database
	5.1.	Australia’s Experience in Compiling a Register: Practical Advice
	5.2.	Information That Can Be Stored on a Computerized Register
	5.3.	Information Stored on the Registers of Statistics Canada and Singapore’s Department of Statistics
	A7.1.	National Numbering Agencies

Tables
	1.1.	Global Portfolio Investment Assets and Liabilities
	3.1.	Instruments Covered by Participants in the 1997 CPIS
	4.1.	Countries in the 1997 CPIS Using a Securities Database, by Type of Database and Extent of Coverage
	5.1.	Sources Used to Build a Register or to Maintain It over Time
	5.2.	Computer Packages Used to Process the 1997 CPIS Results
	6.1.	Type of Survey Used in 1997 CPIS
	6.2.	Unadjusted 1997 and 1998 CPIS Results for Belgium

Figures
	4.1.	Potential Double Counting in Compiling Third-Party Holdings Surveys
	5.1.	Indicative Time Line for Conducting the CPIS
	6.1.	Framework of Data Collection in Japan
	6.2.	Reconciliation of Reporting of IIP and Balance of Payments Data in Australia

Index	1,005k pdf file