On September 6, 2019 the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation with Montenegro.
[1]
Montenegro has enjoyed strong economic growth in recent years, boosted by
the implementation of large investment projects, including the construction
of the Bar-Boljare highway. Growth should continue over the medium term,
though at a more moderate pace as highway construction ends. Staff projects
the economy to expand by 3 percent in 2019 and 2.5 percent in 2020, with
the end of highway construction acting as a drag on growth.
While the implementation of large publicly financed infrastructure projects
has added economic growth, the accompanying use of fiscal resources has
contributed to a large increase in government debt including guarantees,
which reached 79 percent of GDP in 2018. Recognizing the need to reduce
public debt, the government has continued to implement its 2017 fiscal
consolidation strategy. Most of the fiscal measures have been implemented,
and the underlying fiscal position has improved. If the fiscal adjustment
is maintained, the primary fiscal surplus should exceed 2 percent of GDP
beginning in 2021, leading government debt to decline to 61 percent of GDP
by 2024.
Despite the recent intervention in two non-systemic domestic banks, the
overall banking sector exhibits improving asset quality, strong credit
growth, high liquidity, and is well capitalized. However, the sector
appears crowded for a small country, which may create earnings challenges
for some banks.
The lack of an independent currency and declining fiscal space constrain
Montenegro’s ability to absorb shocks, which underscores the need for an
improvement in economic flexibility to sustain growth over the long run.
Low labor productivity and employment levels and a large informal sector
limit potential growth.
Executive Board Assessment
[2]
Executive Directors welcomed the strong recent growth performance of the
Montenegrin economy, bolstered by large investment projects and buoyant
tourism, and took positive note of the significant fiscal adjustment since
2017. Notwithstanding these achievements, Directors stressed the importance
of continued fiscal adjustment, further efforts to strengthen banking
sector supervision, and fiscal and structural reforms to support inclusive
growth over the medium term.
Directors welcomed the authorities’ continued implementation of their
medium‑term adjustment strategy, which has improved the underlying fiscal
position over the last two years. Amid high debt levels, Directors
concurred that the maintenance of a strong primary fiscal surplus over the
medium term is necessary for government debt to decline to safer levels.
Directors also called for further efforts to improve the efficiency of
public spending, including by carefully managing infrastructure investment,
rationalizing government employment and tax expenditures and furthering
pension reforms. In this context, Directors encouraged the authorities to
move forward with their plans to develop medium‑term budgetary and public
investment management frameworks. They noted that such initiatives would
help create fiscal space over the medium term for greater high‑productivity
capital spending and targeted social spending and promote fiscal and debt
sustainability.
Directors underlined that caution is needed in implementing the next phases
of the Bar‑Boljare highway project until feasibility, cost‑benefit
analyses, and financing issues are fully addressed. In this context,
Directors underscored the need to consider the trade‑offs between
undertaking the highway investment vis‑à‑vis other priority spending needs
to meet Montenegro’s development goals. In a similar vein, Directors agreed
that PPP arrangements should be approached with caution to reduce the risk
of assuming significant contingent fiscal liabilities.
Directors welcomed recent measures to strengthen banking supervision,
including the establishment of a Supervisory Committee, recent refinements
in asset classification rules and ongoing efforts to bolster the capacities
and resources in off‑site supervision. Notwithstanding these efforts,
Directors underscored the importance of furthering risk‑based supervision,
introducing macroprudential measures when warranted, harmonizing banking
laws with the EU Directives, and completing the planned asset quality
review by the end of 2020. Directors also encouraged the authorities to
strengthen the AML/CFT supervisory framework, including through enhanced
monitoring of potential reputational and financial integrity risks posed by
the investor citizenship program.
Directors noted the importance of structural reforms to boost
competitiveness and inclusive growth and improve Montenegro’s external
position and labor market outcomes over the medium term. While welcoming
the authorities’ recent efforts to reduce the labor tax wedge and the
proposed labor law to selectively reduce some gaps in employment protection
between temporary versus open‑ended contracts, Directors encouraged the
authorities to carefully consider the impact of the planned minimum wage
increases.
|
Montenegro: Selected Economic Indicators, 2015
–20
|
|
|
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proj.
|
Proj.
|
|
Output, prices and labor market
(percent change, unless otherwise noted)
|
|
|
Real GDP (percent change)
|
3.4
|
2.9
|
4.7
|
4.9
|
3.0
|
2.5
|
|
|
Nominal GDP (in millions of euro)
|
3,655
|
3,954
|
4,299
|
4,619
|
4,807
|
5,015
|
|
|
Industrial production
|
8.2
|
-2.9
|
-4.4
|
22.5
|
...
|
...
|
|
|
Tourism (Overnight stays)
|
5.3
|
8.4
|
10.5
|
8.2
|
...
|
...
|
|
|
Unemployment rate (in percent)
|
17.6
|
17.7
|
16.1
|
15.2
|
...
|
...
|
|
|
Consumer prices (average)
|
1.5
|
-0.3
|
2.4
|
2.6
|
1.1
|
1.9
|
|
|
Consumer prices (end of period)
|
1.4
|
1.0
|
1.9
|
1.7
|
2.3
|
1.6
|
|
|
Average net wage (12-month)
|
0.7
|
4.0
|
2.3
|
0.1
|
...
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General government finances
(percent of GDP) 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue and grants
|
40.4
|
41.3
|
40.3
|
41.4
|
42.0
|
41.0
|
|
|
Expenditure
|
46.4
|
47.5
|
47.2
|
47.7
|
45.7
|
41.9
|
|
|
Overall fiscal balance
|
-6.0
|
-6.2
|
-6.9
|
-6.3
|
-3.6
|
-0.9
|
|
|
Primary fiscal balance
|
-3.6
|
-4.0
|
-4.5
|
-4.1
|
-1.4
|
1.5
|
|
|
General government gross debt
|
69.0
|
66.6
|
66.3
|
72.6
|
81.1
|
74.8
|
|
|
General gov’t gross debt (authorities’ definition) 2
|
66.3
|
64.6
|
64.4
|
70.8
|
79.4
|
73.1
|
|
|
General gov’t debt, including loan guarantees
|
76.4
|
74.1
|
73.6
|
78.8
|
88.8
|
82.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monetary sector
(end-period, percent change)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank credit to private sector
|
2.4
|
6.3
|
8.4
|
9.1
|
7.0
|
7.0
|
|
|
Enterprises
|
2.0
|
1.5
|
6.3
|
5.2
|
...
|
...
|
|
|
Households
|
2.8
|
11.0
|
10.3
|
12.5
|
...
|
...
|
|
|
Private sector deposits
|
9.0
|
6.0
|
15.2
|
6.0
|
...
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of payments
(percent of GDP, unless otherwise noted)
|
|
|
Current account balance
|
-11.0
|
-16.2
|
-16.1
|
-17.2
|
-17.1
|
-14.9
|
|
|
Foreign direct investment
|
16.9
|
9.4
|
11.3
|
7.1
|
8.9
|
8.9
|
|
|
External debt (end of period, stock)
|
166.2
|
160.9
|
159.2
|
167.5
|
180.0
|
178.5
|
|
|
REER (CPI-based; average change, in percent;
|
0.4
|
0.6
|
0.5
|
2.5
|
...
|
...
|
|
|
- indicates depreciation)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources: Montenegro authorities; and IMF staff
estimates and projections
1/
Includes extra-budgetary funds and local governments,
but not public enterprises.
2/
The authorities do not include the arrears of local
governments in their definition of general government
gross debt.
|
1 Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF
holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A
staff team visits the country, collects economic and financial
information, and discusses with officials the country's economic
developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff
prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the
Executive Board.
[2]
At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as
Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors,
and this summary is transmitted to the country's authorities. An
explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found
here:
http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm
.