Washington, DC: The Executive Board of the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation
[1]
with the People’s Republic of China.
The Chinese economy continues its fast recovery from the pandemic, helped
by a strong containment effort and swift policy actions to mitigate the
impact of the crisis. GDP growth is projected at 1.9 percent in 2020 and
7.9 percent in 2021, as economic activity continues to normalize and
domestic outbreaks remain under control. Core inflation is expected to
remain subdued, leaving CPI inflation in 2020-21 below the pre-crisis
target of about 3 percent. Corporate leverage is expected to rise by about
10 percentage points of GDP in 2020. The current account surplus is
projected to widen to 1.9 percent of GDP in 2020 from 1.0 percent in 2019,
before narrowing to below 1 percent in 2021. The projected temporary
increase this year reflects lower commodity prices, the collapse in
outbound tourism, and a surge in exports of pandemic-related and other
goods supported by China’s early recovery of production and higher export
prices.
Macroeconomic and financial policies have supported the recovery.
Policymakers have provided financial relief and fiscal support to protect
the most-affected firms while safeguarding financial stability, including
by providing liquidity to the banking system, expanding re-lending
facilities to smaller enterprises, and introducing a repayment moratorium
until Q1 2021. The authorities have also increased the disbursement and
coverage of unemployment insurance to help vulnerable households and
provided tax relief and waived social security contributions by employers.
Against this backdrop, the general government deficit (including estimated
off-budget investment spending) is projected to rise to 18.2 percent of GDP
in 2020 from 12.6 percent in 2019.
Structural reforms have progressed despite the pandemic, but not evenly
across key areas. The opening of the financial sector has advanced with a
further shortening of the negative lists for foreign investment and the
removal of restrictions on the investment quota for foreign institutional
investors. Labor market reforms, such as hukou reforms, have
improved labor mobility, and the patent law was amended to strengthen
intellectual property protection and foster innovation. At the same time,
progress in real-sector reform has been slow, especially in the area of
state-owned enterprises and competitive neutrality between private and
state-owned firms.
Executive Board Assessment
[2]
Executive Directors noted that the COVID-19 crisis has inflicted
significant human and economic costs on China and commended the authorities
for the effective containment measures and swift macroeconomic and
financial policy support to mitigate the economic impact of the pandemic.
Directors noted, however, that growth was still unbalanced and that fiscal,
monetary, and structural policies should aim at strengthening private
demand to allow for more balanced medium‑term growth.
Directors called for a continuation of the moderately supportive fiscal and
monetary policies until the recovery is on solid ground, while noting that,
in the medium term, fiscal consolidation was necessary to ensure debt
sustainability.
To maximize the policy space, they saw benefits in further improving
the macro-fiscal framework, including intergovernmental coordination
and macroeconomic data, and called for a modernization of the monetary
policy framework to strengthen the transmission of conventional
interest rate policies and enhance financial intermediation. Some
Directors encouraged the authorities to focus on broader concepts of
the fiscal deficit. Directors also called for enhancements to the social safety net to reduce
precautionary savings, which combined with greater progressivity in the tax
system would help address income inequality.
Directors stressed the importance of addressing financial vulnerabilities
proactively to safeguard financial stability. As the recovery takes hold,
the temporary measures supporting the financial sector should be replaced
with policies to address problem loans and strengthen regulatory and
supervisory frameworks. Directors noted the need for a comprehensive bank
restructuring framework in line with international best practices to allow
for the orderly exit of weaker banks. While agreeing with the authorities
on the potential benefits from digital currencies, Directors considered
that more work was needed to assess risks. They also encouraged the
authorities to continue improving their AML/CFT framework.
Directors welcomed continued progress on structural reforms, particularly
in further opening up of the financial sector and improving labor mobility
through hukou reforms.
They stressed the need for further reforms of SOEs, including ensuring
competitive neutrality between SOEs and private enterprises, and some
Directors called for the need to remove remaining implicit guarantees.
Structural reform will be key to boosting potential growth, reduce external
imbalances, and build a more resilient, green, and inclusive economy.
Directors noted that while the current account surplus in 2020 should widen
temporarily, it is expected to narrow over the medium term, reflecting an
unwinding of the temporary impact of the pandemic and a rebalancing of
economic growth. Directors also stressed that greater exchange rate
flexibility would help the economy adjust to the changing external
environment. Some Directors called for further improvement in the
transparency of foreign exchange interventions and phasing out of capital
flow management measures.
Directors welcomed the authorities’ commitment to global cooperation, and
noted that China, together with its partners, had an important role to play
in supporting an open and rules-based international trade system. Directors
also welcomed China’s intention to play an important role in multilateral
efforts to address pressing global challenges, including making any
approved vaccine developed in China widely available to other countries and
in mitigating climate change.
They noted that China has a key role to play in the G-20 DSSI and
Common Framework to provide debt relief to low-income countries, but
noted that further improvements in data transparency were needed for
the success of the global debt relief efforts.
They welcomed China’s ambitious plans for emissions abatement and increased
green investment.
|
China: Selected Economic Indicators
|
|
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projections
|
|
|
(Annual percentage change, unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
NATIONAL ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real GDP (base=2015)
|
6.9
|
6.8
|
6.9
|
6.7
|
6.1
|
1.9
|
7.9
|
5.7
|
5.6
|
5.5
|
5.4
|
|
Total domestic demand
|
7.3
|
7.9
|
6.8
|
7.4
|
5.5
|
1.5
|
8.7
|
5.8
|
5.6
|
5.6
|
5.4
|
|
Consumption
|
8.3
|
8.5
|
7.3
|
8.1
|
6.4
|
-0.8
|
11.3
|
6.4
|
6.5
|
6.2
|
6.1
|
|
Investment
|
6.1
|
7.2
|
6.1
|
6.5
|
4.5
|
4.6
|
5.4
|
5.1
|
4.6
|
4.8
|
4.5
|
|
Fixed
|
7.9
|
7.3
|
5.9
|
7.1
|
5.1
|
4.3
|
6.3
|
4.9
|
4.6
|
4.8
|
4.5
|
|
Inventories (contribution)
|
-0.6
|
0.0
|
0.1
|
-0.2
|
-0.2
|
0.2
|
-0.3
|
0.1
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|
Net exports (contribution)
|
-0.1
|
-0.8
|
0.3
|
-0.5
|
0.7
|
0.4
|
-0.5
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|
Total capital formation (percent of GDP)
|
43.0
|
42.7
|
43.2
|
44.0
|
43.1
|
43.1
|
41.8
|
41.2
|
40.4
|
39.6
|
38.8
|
|
Gross national saving (percent of GDP) 1/
|
45.8
|
44.5
|
44.8
|
44.1
|
44.1
|
45.0
|
42.7
|
42.0
|
41.1
|
40.2
|
39.4
|
|
LABOR MARKET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unemployment rate (annual average) 2/
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
4.9
|
5.2
|
5.4
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
Employment
|
0.3
|
0.2
|
0.0
|
-0.1
|
-0.1
|
-0.3
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
|
PRICES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer prices (average)
|
1.4
|
2.0
|
1.6
|
2.1
|
2.9
|
2.4
|
0.5
|
1.9
|
1.9
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
|
GDP Deflator
|
0.1
|
0.9
|
3.9
|
3.5
|
2.4
|
2.1
|
1.6
|
2.1
|
2.1
|
2.2
|
2.2
|
|
FINANCIAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7-day repo rate (percent)
|
2.4
|
2.7
|
5.4
|
3.1
|
3.1
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
10 year government bond rate (percent)
|
3.7
|
3.0
|
3.9
|
3.3
|
3.2
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
|
Real effective exchange rate (average)
|
9.8
|
-4.9
|
-2.9
|
1.4
|
-0.8
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
Nominal effective exchange rate (average)
|
9.7
|
-5.4
|
-2.5
|
1.5
|
-1.8
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
MACRO-FINANCIAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total social financing
|
12.5
|
30.5
|
14.1
|
10.3
|
10.7
|
13.8
|
12.2
|
9.4
|
8.8
|
8.4
|
7.9
|
|
In percent of GDP
|
200
|
242
|
248
|
248
|
253
|
276
|
283
|
287
|
290
|
291
|
292
|
|
Total nonfinancial sector debt 3/
|
14.5
|
16.8
|
14.3
|
10.8
|
10.7
|
13.9
|
12.4
|
9.8
|
9.2
|
8.7
|
8.2
|
|
In percent of GDP
|
222
|
241
|
248
|
248
|
253
|
277
|
284
|
289
|
293
|
295
|
297
|
|
Domestic credit to the private sector
|
15.9
|
12.6
|
11.6
|
8.3
|
9.2
|
12.0
|
11.0
|
7.9
|
7.5
|
7.1
|
6.5
|
|
In percent of GDP
|
161
|
168
|
169
|
166
|
167
|
179
|
182
|
182
|
181
|
180
|
178
|
|
House price 4/
|
9.1
|
11.3
|
5.7
|
12.3
|
8.6
|
7.0
|
6.5
|
6.2
|
5.9
|
5.8
|
5.7
|
|
Household disposable income (percent of GDP)
|
61.1
|
61.6
|
60.1
|
59.3
|
59.1
|
57.6
|
59.2
|
59.1
|
58.9
|
58.6
|
58.3
|
|
Household savings (percent of disposable income)
|
38.4
|
37.2
|
35.7
|
34.8
|
34.4
|
37.1
|
33.7
|
31.8
|
29.9
|
27.9
|
25.9
|
|
Household debt (percent of GDP)
|
39.1
|
44.7
|
48.9
|
52.3
|
55.6
|
58.3
|
61.3
|
62.4
|
64.0
|
64.9
|
66.0
|
|
Non-financial corporate domestic debt (percent of GDP)
|
122
|
124
|
120
|
113
|
111
|
121
|
120
|
119
|
117
|
115
|
112
|
|
BIS credit-to-GDP gap (percent of GDP)
|
25.4
|
20.8
|
11.8
|
0.3
|
-2.2
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
GENERAL BUDGETARY GOVERNMENT (Percent of GDP)
|
|
|
Net lending/borrowing 5/
|
-2.8
|
-3.7
|
-3.8
|
-4.7
|
-6.3
|
-11.9
|
-11.0
|
-10.1
|
-9.1
|
-8.3
|
-7.5
|
|
Revenue
|
28.8
|
28.2
|
27.8
|
28.3
|
27.7
|
24.5
|
25.0
|
25.3
|
25.8
|
26.5
|
27.1
|
|
Additional financing from land sales
|
1.9
|
2.0
|
2.5
|
2.8
|
2.9
|
2.9
|
2.9
|
2.9
|
2.9
|
2.9
|
2.9
|
|
Expenditure
|
33.5
|
33.9
|
34.2
|
35.8
|
36.9
|
39.3
|
38.9
|
38.3
|
37.9
|
37.8
|
37.6
|
|
Debt 6/
|
36.7
|
36.7
|
36.2
|
36.5
|
38.1
|
44.7
|
47.2
|
49.5
|
51.2
|
52.6
|
53.8
|
|
Structural balance
|
-2.5
|
-3.4
|
-3.6
|
-4.5
|
-6.0
|
-10.6
|
-10.3
|
-9.6
|
-8.8
|
-8.1
|
-7.5
|
|
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS (Percent of GDP)
|
|
|
Current account balance
|
2.7
|
1.8
|
1.6
|
0.2
|
1.0
|
1.9
|
0.9
|
0.8
|
0.8
|
0.6
|
0.5
|
|
Trade balance
|
5.2
|
4.4
|
3.9
|
2.9
|
3.0
|
3.5
|
2.6
|
2.8
|
2.6
|
2.5
|
2.4
|
|
Services balance
|
-2.0
|
-2.1
|
-2.1
|
-2.1
|
-1.8
|
-1.1
|
-1.3
|
-1.7
|
-1.7
|
-1.7
|
-1.7
|
|
Net international investment position
|
15.1
|
17.4
|
17.1
|
15.5
|
14.7
|
16.1
|
15.2
|
14.8
|
14.4
|
13.9
|
13.4
|
|
Gross official reserves (billions of U.S. dollars)
|
3,406
|
3,098
|
3,236
|
3,168
|
3,223
|
3,579
|
3,842
|
4,127
|
4,427
|
4,734
|
5,056
|
|
MEMORANDUM ITEMS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominal GDP (billions of RMB) 7/
|
69,209
|
74,598
|
82,898
|
91,577
|
99,493
|
103,462
|
113,377
|
122,286
|
131,750
|
142,072
|
153,020
|
|
Augmented debt (percent of GDP) 8/
|
55.2
|
66.4
|
72.8
|
76.4
|
80.5
|
91.7
|
96.4
|
101.4
|
105.6
|
109.3
|
112.7
|
|
Augmented net lending/borrowing (percent of GDP) 8/
|
-8.7
|
-15.9
|
-13.5
|
-11.8
|
-12.6
|
-18.2
|
-17.2
|
-16.3
|
-15.4
|
-14.6
|
-13.8
|
|
Sources: Bloomberg, CEIC, IMF International Financial
Statistics database, and IMF staff estimates and
projections.
|
|
1/ IMF staff estimates for 2019.
|
|
2/ Surveyed unemployment rate.
|
|
3/ Includes government funds.
|
|
4/ Average selling prices estimated by IMF staff based on
the data of national housing sale values and volumes
published by the National Bureau of Statistics
|
|
5/ Adjustments are made to the authorities' fiscal
budgetary balances to reflect consolidated general
budgetary government balance, including government-managed
funds, state-administered SOE funds, adjustment to the
stabilization fund, and social security fund.
|
|
6/ The estimation of debt levels after 2015 assumes zero
off-budget borrowing from 2015 to 2025.
|
|
7/ Expenditure side nominal GDP.
|
|
8/ The augmented balance expands the perimeter of
government to include government-managed funds and the
activity of local government financing vehicles (LGFVs).
|
[1]
Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds
bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff
team visits the country, collects economic and financial
information, and discusses with officials the country's economic
developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff
prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the
Executive Board.
[2]
At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as
Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors,
and this summary is transmitted to the country's authorities. An
explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found
here:
http://www.IMF.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm
.