Washington, DC
:
The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the
Article IV consultation
[1]
with Paraguay on June 15, 2022 and endorsed the staff appraisal without a
meeting on a lapse-of-time basis.
[2]
After two consecutive years of GDP decline, Paraguay’s economy rebounded in
2021, growing by 4.2 percent thanks to a recovery in the secondary and
tertiary sectors and despite contractions in agricultural production and
electricity generation. The Covid-19 pandemic currently appears under
control and most of the remaining restrictions have recently been lifted.
Annual headline inflation started increasing sharply in the second half of
2021 primarily due to higher food and fuel prices, a phenomenon exacerbated
by the war in Ukraine, reaching 11.8 percent in April 2022. The Central
Bank of Paraguay reacted quickly and has raised its policy rate by a
cumulative 650 basis points to 7.25 percent by end-May 2022. The fiscal
position has improved since the 2019 and 2020 shocks. After increasing to
6.1 percent of GDP in 2020, the fiscal deficit fell to 3.7 percent of GDP
in 2021 partly thanks to the expiration of one-off emergency measures.
The medium-term outlook remains favorable though there are challenges in
the near-term. While heatwaves and a severe drought have diminished 2022
GDP growth prospects to 0.3 percent, staff projects a rebound of 4.5
percent in 2023, and 3.5 percent growth over the medium term. End-2022
inflation would be above the central bank’s tolerance corridor of 4 percent
+/- 2 percent, at about 8 percent, but is projected to converge back to the
authorities’ target by end-2023. The authorities remain committed to their
medium-term fiscal target of converging back to the 1.5 percent of GDP
deficit limit under the Fiscal Responsibility Law.
Risks to the outlook include fiscal pressures from demands for salary
increases and various bills in Congress. Over a longer horizon, Paraguay is
vulnerable to climate change and faces risks from changes in precipitation
patterns and the frequency and intensity of severe weather events.
Executive Board Assessment
In concluding the 2022 Article IV consultation with Paraguay, Executive
Directors endorsed the staff’s appraisal, as follows:
After three years of continuous external shocks, Paraguay faces
difficult challenges in 2022 and beyond.
Just as the country was recovering from the impact of the Covid-19
pandemic, recent drought and international price shocks have halted the
economic expansion. Countercyclical fiscal policies since 2019 mitigated
the impact of the shocks, but they also raised public debt and depleted
fiscal buffers. The monetary policy stance needs to maintain a tightening
bias in the face of global inflationary pressures, while striving to avoid
adding to undue strains on the financial system and the economy. Despite
the challenges Paraguay is facing in 2022, it is worth noting that the
external position in 2021 was stronger than the level implied by
fundamentals and desirable policies.
To protect the hard-won fiscal credibility, the commitment to the
fiscal rule should be maintained.
The government’s goal to return to the FRL’s deficit ceiling remains
appropriate, but the transition path appears increasingly rocky in the face
of ongoing fiscal pressures during a pre-electoral period. In this context,
it would be helpful to codify the return to the deficit ceiling in the
updated version of the Fiscal Responsibility Law, which is still awaiting
discussion in Congress.
Rebuilding fiscal space is even more important considering Paraguay’s
substantial spending needs in critical sectors for long-term inclusive
growth.
The Covid-19 pandemic has laid bare shortcomings in the public health
system, but education is also under-resourced, and investment needs in
basic infrastructure and resilience to climate change are large.
Eliminating waste and raising public spending efficiency would be part of
the response, as well as greater involvement of the private sector, for
example through public-private partnerships. However, on their own these
policy levers are not likely to generate sufficient resources to cover the
gaps.
The government also needs to raise more domestic revenue to address
these challenges.
Over the medium-term there is room to increase the tax per GDP ratio.
Besides continued improvement in tax administration, the authorities should
reassess Paraguay’s special tax regimes for specific sectors and
activities, and consider another tax reform that goes beyond the
improvements enacted in 2020.
Paraguay responded well to the pandemic through quick and novel
temporary social assistance programs.
The timely delivery and quick implementation of cash transfers through
digital and mobile systems prevented a larger spike in poverty, but those
programs could have been, with the benefit of hindsight, targeted even
better. The lessons learnt and the data collected should be carried over to
upgrade the system of beneficiaries of the overall social safety net.
Returning to price stability remains the main objective of the Central
Bank,
and the BCP is well-equipped to address the challenges and has responded
fast and appropriately. However, the underlying price pressures are of a
global nature, which will require both a balanced approach and patience.
Further adjustments to the monetary policy stance need to remain flexible
and data dependent, particularly with regard to inflation drivers and the
feedback effects between actual inflation and inflation expectations.
The banking system remains well-capitalized and profitable, and the
authorities should continue their efforts to both deepen and widen
financial supervision.
Supervisors should continue to follow their work plan to implement
risk-based supervision. The supervisory perimeter should be extended to
include pension funds and the independence and integrity of the regulatory
agency for financial cooperatives should be strengthened. Authorities’
efforts to enhance financial inclusion are welcome and should continue.
Paraguay should also continue to follow guidance by the peer evaluation on
AML/CFT issues.
Paraguay should step up the implementation of structural reform
measures.
Governance, business climate, and the efficiency of the public sector would
all improve by implementing proposals that have been largely formulated:
reforms of public procurement, the civil service, and the structure of the
state have matured into legal bills and could be approved and implemented
fairly quickly. These would go a long way in reducing corruption risks and
unleashing the growth potential of non-traditional sectors of the economy.
Policies to counteract the impact of climate change are being formulated.
They should be fully integrated in the planning framework for national
development and for the medium-and long-term fiscal budget. Paraguay’s
favorable electricity matrix offers opportunities for the transition toward
net-zero GHG consumption and production routines. These efforts should be
complemented by further investment in the supply of renewable energies and
revitalized initiatives to stop deforestation and degradation in the
vulnerable habitats of the country.
[1]
Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds
bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff
team visits the country, collects economic and financial
information, and discusses with officials the country's economic
developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff
prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the
Executive Board.
[2]
The Executive Board takes decisions under its lapse-of-time
procedure when the Board agrees that a proposal can be considered
without convening formal discussions.
|
Table 1. Paraguay: Selected Economic and Financial
Indicators
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prel.
|
Proj.
|
|
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
2025
|
2026
|
2027
|
|
|
(Annual percent change, unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
Income and prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real GDP
|
3.2
|
-0.4
|
-0.8
|
4.2
|
0.3
|
4.5
|
3.5
|
3.5
|
3.5
|
3.5
|
|
Nominal GDP
|
5.2
|
2.6
|
1.4
|
10.1
|
10.9
|
8.9
|
7.2
|
8.1
|
7.7
|
7.9
|
|
Per capita GDP (U.S. dollars,
thousands)
|
5.7
|
5.3
|
4.9
|
5.2
|
5.6
|
5.9
|
6.2
|
6.5
|
6.8
|
7.1
|
|
Consumption (contribution to real GDP
growth)
|
3.1
|
1.7
|
-1.7
|
4.4
|
2.8
|
-4.3
|
0.3
|
2.9
|
2.6
|
2.5
|
|
Investment (contribution to real GDP
growth)
|
3.0
|
-1.5
|
-1.0
|
5.3
|
2.3
|
5.8
|
2.9
|
1.2
|
1.4
|
1.4
|
|
Net Exports (contribution to real
growth)
|
-2.9
|
-0.6
|
1.9
|
-5.5
|
-4.9
|
3.0
|
0.3
|
-0.5
|
-0.5
|
-0.4
|
|
Consumer prices (end of period)
|
3.2
|
2.8
|
2.2
|
6.8
|
8.0
|
4.2
|
4.0
|
4.0
|
4.0
|
4.0
|
|
Nominal exchange rate (Guarani per U.S.
dollar, eop)
|
5,961
|
6,453
|
6,917
|
6,879
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
Monetary sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit to private sector 1/
|
14.1
|
9.7
|
8.1
|
10.5
|
9.4
|
8.6
|
9.0
|
8.9
|
9.0
|
9.0
|
|
Monetary policy rate, year-end
|
5.3
|
4.0
|
0.75
|
5.25
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
External sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exports (fob, values)
|
2.5
|
-7.5
|
-9.5
|
22.0
|
-11.4
|
18.1
|
3.5
|
4.1
|
3.0
|
3.7
|
|
Imports (cif, values)
|
12.1
|
-5.2
|
-18.1
|
30.4
|
-1.9
|
6.2
|
2.7
|
3.4
|
3.1
|
3.3
|
|
Terms of trade
|
-2.1
|
-2.7
|
-0.5
|
-2.6
|
3.8
|
-1.7
|
-0.5
|
2.1
|
1.0
|
1.4
|
|
Real effective exchange rate 2/
|
3.3
|
-2.9
|
-1.2
|
0.3
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
|
(In percent of GDP, unless otherwise
indicated)
|
|
External current account
|
-0.2
|
-0.5
|
2.7
|
0.8
|
-2.9
|
0.4
|
0.5
|
0.6
|
0.6
|
0.7
|
|
Trade balance
|
1.2
|
0.3
|
3.8
|
1.8
|
-1.5
|
1.8
|
2.0
|
2.1
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
|
Exports
|
34.1
|
33.5
|
32.4
|
36.6
|
29.7
|
32.9
|
32.2
|
31.5
|
30.7
|
30.1
|
|
Of which: Electricity
|
5.2
|
4.5
|
4.9
|
4.2
|
3.6
|
3.1
|
2.8
|
2.5
|
2.2
|
1.9
|
|
Imports
|
-32.1
|
-32.3
|
-28.3
|
-34.2
|
-30.6
|
-30.5
|
-29.6
|
-28.9
|
-28.1
|
-27.4
|
|
Of which: Oil imports
|
-4.1
|
-3.8
|
-3.0
|
-4.0
|
-6.9
|
-5.1
|
-4.3
|
-3.9
|
-3.6
|
-3.5
|
|
Capital account and financial
account
|
1.6
|
1.4
|
3.1
|
3.0
|
3.1
|
0.6
|
0.7
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.2
|
|
Of which: Direct investment
|
0.4
|
0.6
|
0.3
|
0.3
|
1.2
|
4.0
|
4.4
|
1.4
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
|
Gross international reserves (in
millions of U.S. dollars)
|
8,004
|
7,500
|
9,976
|
10,570
|
10,070
|
10,570
|
11,120
|
11,670
|
12,220
|
12,770
|
|
In months of next-year imports of goods
and services
|
7.0
|
8.3
|
8.6
|
8.9
|
8.0
|
8.2
|
8.3
|
8.4
|
8.5
|
8.6
|
|
Ratio to short-term external debt
|
2.2
|
2.1
|
2.4
|
2.4
|
2.3
|
2.4
|
2.6
|
2.7
|
2.9
|
7.3
|
|
Gross domestic investment
|
22.8
|
21.7
|
20.0
|
22.4
|
24.0
|
27.9
|
29.5
|
29.3
|
29.4
|
29.5
|
|
Gross domestic saving
|
22.6
|
21.2
|
22.7
|
23.2
|
21.1
|
28.3
|
29.9
|
29.9
|
30.0
|
30.2
|
|
Central government revenues
|
14.0
|
14.2
|
13.5
|
14.0
|
13.5
|
13.6
|
13.8
|
13.8
|
13.7
|
13.7
|
|
Of which: Tax revenues
|
9.9
|
10.0
|
9.5
|
10.0
|
9.8
|
9.8
|
10.0
|
10.1
|
10.1
|
10.2
|
|
Central government expenditures
|
15.4
|
17.0
|
19.7
|
17.8
|
16.7
|
16.0
|
15.3
|
15.2
|
15.2
|
15.3
|
|
Of which: Compensation of Employees
|
6.6
|
7.0
|
7.3
|
6.8
|
7.0
|
6.7
|
6.5
|
6.5
|
6.3
|
6.1
|
|
Of which: Net Acquisition of Non
Financial Assets
|
2.0
|
2.9
|
3.6
|
3.0
|
2.3
|
1.9
|
1.4
|
1.5
|
1.8
|
2.0
|
|
Central government net
lending/borrowing
|
-1.4
|
-2.9
|
-6.1
|
-3.7
|
-3.2
|
-2.3
|
-1.5
|
-1.4
|
-1.5
|
-1.5
|
|
Central government primary balance
|
-0.7
|
-2.0
|
-5.1
|
-2.6
|
-2.6
|
-1.9
|
-0.9
|
0.0
|
0.1
|
0.0
|
|
Public sector debt (excl. central
bank bills)
|
22.3
|
25.8
|
36.9
|
37.7
|
39.5
|
39.0
|
38.7
|
37.9
|
37.2
|
36.5
|
|
Of which: Foreign currency
|
18.1
|
21.4
|
31.9
|
33.0
|
34.1
|
33.7
|
33.3
|
32.5
|
31.9
|
31.1
|
|
Of which: Domestic currency
|
4.2
|
4.4
|
5.0
|
4.7
|
5.3
|
5.3
|
5.4
|
5.3
|
5.3
|
5.4
|
|
Memorandum items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP (billions of Guaranies) 3/
|
230,576
|
236,567
|
239,915
|
264,103
|
292,829
|
318,781
|
341,889
|
369,614
|
398,138
|
429,456
|
|
GDP (US$ billions)
|
40.2
|
37.9
|
35.4
|
38.3
|
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
Sources: Central Bank of Paraguay; Ministry of Finance; and
IMF staff estimates and projections.
1/ Includes local currency credit and foreign currency
credit valued at a constant exchange rate.
2/ Average annual change; a positive change indicates an
appreciation.
3/ Historical GDPs were revised in 2018, including a 30
percent upward revision in nominal GDP for 2017.
|