IMF Staff Country Reports

Republic of Congo: Request for an Extension of the Extended Credit Facility Arrangement-Staff Report

January 28, 2025

Preview Citation

Format: Chicago

International Monetary Fund. African Dept. "Republic of Congo: Request for an Extension of the Extended Credit Facility Arrangement-Staff Report", IMF Staff Country Reports 2025, 024 (2025), accessed 12/7/2025, https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229000055.002

Export Citation

  • ProCite
  • RefWorks
  • Reference Manager
  • BibTex
  • Zotero
  • EndNote

Summary

This paper focuses on Congo’s Request for an Extension of the Extended Credit Facility Arrangement. The extension seeks to allow sufficient time to complete the sixth (and final) review. Preliminary data suggest that program performance at end-June 2024 was mixed. All end-June 2024 quantitative performance criteria were met, but the continuous zero ceiling on new external arrears was breached while several indicative targets were missed. The authorities reaffirmed their commitment to fiscal prudence to alleviate ongoing liquidity pressures and preserve the gains achieved under the Extended Credit Facility (ECF). Fiscal consolidation will continue in 2025 supported by improved nonhydrocarbon revenue mobilization and expenditure rationalization, while protecting targeted poverty-reducing spending. The authorities concurred that laying the foundations for a sustainable and inclusive growth requires stepping up the implementation of structural reforms to strengthen debt management practices, enhance governance, accelerate economic diversification, and build a climate-proof economy. IMF supports the authorities’ request for an extension of the ECF arrangement.

Subject: Asset and liability management, Economic growth, Fiscal policy, Government debt management, Inclusive growth, Liquidity, Public financial management (PFM), Revenue mobilization

Keywords: ECF arrangement, ECF review, filets Sociaux, Government debt management, IMF's transparency policy, Inclusive growth, Liquidity, liquidity pressure, reform progress, Revenue mobilization