Investor Sentiment, Sovereign Debt Mispricing, and Economic Outcomes
IMF Working Papers, August 14, 2020
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Investor Sentiment, Sovereign Debt Mispricing, and Economic Outcomes
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Ramzy Al Amine, Tim Willems
- Published: August 14, 2020
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513550855.001
Summary of findings
- Countries able to borrow at spreads that seem low given fundamentals (for example because investors take a bullish view on a country's future) are more likely to develop economic difficulties later on.
- Past sovereign debt mispricing is relevant for predicting future outcomes: incorporating mispricing measures reduces the RMSE of real GDP growth forecasts by as much as 15 percent.
- Results provide strong support for theories of sentiment affecting the business cycle.
- Countries should not solely rely on spread levels when determining fiscal strategy; underlying fundamentals should inform policy as well, since historical relationships between spreads and fundamentals often continue to apply in the medium-to-long run.
Methodology
- Two-stage empirical procedure:
- Stage 1: regression linking sovereign spreads to fundamentals.
- Stage 2: residuals from the Stage-1 regression (interpreted as mispricing / investor sentiment) deployed to assess impact on future outcomes (real GDP growth and the occurrence of fiscal crises).
- Out-of-sample validation exercises and cross-validation procedures (including a leave-one-out procedure) are used to confirm predictive relevance.
Key empirical results and metrics
- Reduction in RMSE of real GDP growth forecasts by as much as 15 percent when including measures of past sovereign debt mispricing.
- Primary assessed future outcomes:
- real GDP growth
- occurrence of fiscal crises
Policy implications and recommendations
- Fiscal strategy should be informed by underlying fundamentals in addition to observed spread levels.
- Reliance solely on low spreads can be misleading if spreads reflect investor over-optimism rather than fundamentals, increasing the risk of later economic difficulties.
- Historical relationships between spreads and fundamentals often persist into the medium-to-long run and should therefore guide policy decisions.
Subjects and keywords
- Subjects: Balance of payments, Current account deficits, Economic forecasting, External debt, Government consumption, National accounts, Public debt
- Keywords: credit rating, cross-validation procedure, Current account deficits, debt crises, Government consumption, growth forecast, growth forecasting, investor sentiment, leave-one-out procedure, over-optimism, real GDP growth, sentiment, Southern Europe, sovereign debt, sovereign spreads, spread discount, spreads data, sub, WP
Content in this bundle
- Working Paper