Output Gap Uncertainty and Fiscal Policy Adjustment in Real-Time in Emerging Economies
IMF Working Papers, December 13, 2024
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Output Gap Uncertainty and Fiscal Policy Adjustment in Real-Time in Emerging Economies
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Giacomo Cattelan, Boaz Nandwa
- Published: December 13, 2024
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400295164.001
Summary of research question and approach
- Examines how uncertainty around real-time output gap estimates affects discretionary fiscal policy in emerging markets (EMs).
- Uses successive vintages of the World Economic Outlook for emerging markets during 1998-2022 to analyze real-time reactions of fiscal policy to the economic cycle.
- Calibrates a New Keynesian DSGE model to match the behavior of an average EM.
Key empirical findings
- EMs tend to have persistently negative and significantly more volatile real-time output gap estimates compared to advanced economies (AEs).
- EMs are less responsive to output gap shocks in real-time compared to AEs.
Model-based results and scenarios
- When EM policy makers are equally concerned about:
- uncertainty around output gap estimates, and
- fiscal implementation,
- then fiscal policy is less counter-cyclical than the benchmark case with no uncertainty, entailing an efficiency loss for the purpose of output gap stabilization.
- When the concern is only about output gap uncertainty:
- EM policy makers tend to react more counter-cyclically,
- at a cost of public debt spiking in the short term and stabilizing over the long term.
- This implies it might be optimal for EM policy makers to act more aggressively to stabilize the economy.
- By adjusting the relative importance of output gap versus debt stabilization in their objective function, EM policy makers can achieve a similar outcome as in the benchmark case with no uncertainty.
Policy implications and recommendations
- Consideration of output gap estimate uncertainty should affect fiscal response design in EMs.
- Balancing the trade-off between output gap stabilization and public debt dynamics is crucial:
- Stronger counter-cyclical fiscal responses can improve output stabilization but may cause short-term public debt spikes.
- Adjusting objective function weights on output gap versus debt stabilization can restore outcomes similar to an uncertainty-free benchmark.
- EM policy makers may need to act more aggressively on output stabilization when uncertainty is primarily about the output gap, while managing implementation risks when those are also a concern.
Subject areas and keywords
- Subject: Economic theory, Expenditure, Fiscal policy, Fiscal stance, Neoclassical theory, Output gap, Production, Public debt
- Keywords: Fiscal policy, fiscal policy adjustment, Fiscal stance, Neoclassical theory, Output gap, output gap estimate, output gap shock, output gap uncertainty, public debt, real-time output gap, real-time output gap estimates
Content in this bundle
- Working Paper