A two-way street
Trade in cultural goods such as movies and music has always been fraught
with cultural and political sensitivities. It still is.
European countries have long mandated that a certain portion of content
broadcast, and now streamed, be locally produced. China has fashioned a
landscape where foreign content is carefully monitored, giving rise to
robust streaming dominated by Chinese players Tencent and iQiyi. Cultural
sensitivities in India have forced large US companies to make course
corrections to keep business growing.
But in markets where US-based giants like Netflix and Amazon operate,
they’ve acted more as facilitators of free trade than cultural hegemons,
said Joel Waldfogel, a professor of economics at the University of
Minnesota.
“The happy surprise here is that this trade is a two-way street. So now
it’s a horse race,” said Waldfogel, who studies how digitization of content
has affected creative economies. “What we’ve seen in even the slightly
longer run is the costs of producing things have fallen so much that there
has been an explosion in creation in music and movies.”
Waldfogel argues in his 2018 book Digital Renaissance that
digitization of content is ushering in a golden age of popular culture.
New technologies have put filmmaking capabilities into more hands. The
internet, meanwhile, has expanded distribution channels. For movies that
means bypassing traditional theaters and box office releases. Amid the
pandemic, this trend has accelerated even in markets like India, where
straight to streaming has lagged behind the United States.
Streaming services have elevated lower-budget productions and glossy
high-dollar films to the same platform.
“Cultural products are extreme examples of products where it’s very hard to
predict what will be good, meaning appealing to consumers at the time the
investment decision gets made,” said Waldfogel. “There’s an expression in
Hollywood, ‘nobody knows anything.’”
However, the rise of streaming services has taken some of the guesswork out
of film production. In economic terms, the internet has created economies
of scale and scope, meaning there is more supply and demand for greater
quantity and variety of creative content. By matching viewers more easily
with what they want to see, it has created a more efficient business model
that can be adapted almost anywhere in the world.
That’s been good news for emerging markets with large captive audiences and
the capacity to produce content. Streaming services from Netflix and Amazon
have played a key role in providing another avenue for TV and film
industries in these markets and increasing competition with domestic
broadcasters.
“For a producer, there’s nothing more than to be seen beyond your natural
geographic reach,” said Couto, of Media Partners Asia. “For the cultural
entities of a country, whether they are governments or institutions, to
have a story that showcases your country, that has those values and gives a
global name to your content—that’s huge as well, because it all comes back
in economic contribution.”
For Ahuja, the creator of Namaste Wahala, the opportunity came
with an invite to a launch event with Netflix executives in Lagos in
February 2020. Pre-release promotion of her movie had garnered attention.
The movie was set to release in Nigerian cinemas in April 2020, but then
the pandemic hit. The streaming giant provided an opportunity.
“I feel like this is a content market right now,” she says. “I don’t think
there’s a limit on how much content can be put out there.”