How Inflation Radically Changes Economic Ideas by John Cochrane
Source details
- Canonical URL
- How Inflation Radically Changes Economic Ideas by John Cochrane
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: JOHN H COCHRANE
- Published: March 4, 2024
Central thesis and overview
- The unexpected resurgence of inflation demonstrates that the consensus ideas of economic policy are wrong and need to change.
- The “new” ideas needed are characterized as well tested and available: supply-oriented, incentive-focused, and fiscally prudent policies.
- Inflation comes when aggregate demand exceeds aggregate supply.
Causes of recent inflation (demand vs. supply)
- Fiscal expansion as a primary source of demand:
- The US government sent about $5 trillion in checks to people and businesses.
- $3 trillion of that was newly printed money, with no plans for repayment.
- Other countries enacted similar fiscal expansions and reaped inflation in proportion.
- Supply considerations:
- Supply did shrink during the pandemic, but inflation spiked after the pandemic was largely over.
- Many “supply shock” industries were producing as much as before but could not keep up with demand.
- The precise share of inflation from demand versus reduced supply matters little to the core lesson: supply (productive capacity) is far more limited than previously thought.
Implications for growth and policy orientation
- A supply-limited economy requires supply-oriented policy, not stimulus.
- Jobs characterized as make-work are a cost, not a benefit, when unemployment is low:
- US unemployment cited as 3.7 percent.
- Policies and reforms advocated to increase productive capacity and incentives:
- Reduce regulations that make housing costly and time-consuming to build.
- Implement a coherent immigration system to bring in workers who produce and pay taxes.
- Invest in public infrastructure, but be mindful of “obscene excess cost.”
- Eliminate tariffs that force overpayment for goods foreigners can provide more efficiently.
- Focus redistribution policy on incentives that promote growth.
Fiscal constraints and borrowing limits
- The view of unlimited demand for government debt has proved false:
- The US, UK, and Europe seem to be able to borrow about 100 percent of GDP.
- Consequences of more debt:
- More debt leads to higher interest rates, trouble borrowing, and inflation as people try to spend the extra debt rather than hold it.
- Governments must spend as if they have to raise taxes to pay for it, now or later.
- Projections that debt will serenely grow to 200 percent of GDP under primary deficits that are eternally 5–10 percent of GDP will simply not happen.
- Fiscal capacity is diminished for future shocks:
- If the $5 trillion pandemic response was more debt than people will hold and caused inflation, the $10 trillion response to the next crisis will face even more trouble.
Critique of subsidy- and industrial-policy approaches
- Left-wing proposals: spending trillions on cost-ineffective climate subsidies (example given: massively oversize electric cars built in the US, by union labor, with US parts).
- Right-wing proposals: spending trillions on protection and industrial subsidies to revive 1950s manufacturing.
- Warning: industrial policy risks repeating harmful effects (example: Jones Act parallels), and now that money is no longer free, spending must be effective.
Monetary and financial lessons
- Two deep lessons for monetary and financial policy:
- Central banks do not entirely control inflation; inflation control needs fiscal probity as well.
- The fiscal blowout included a financial bailout of Treasury, municipal, and corporate debt; money market funds; airlines; and others.
- The “no more bailouts” promise of Dodd-Frank failed; extensive regulation (another 100,000 regulations) is unlikely to solve the underlying issues.
- The proposed solution: return to the classic vision of equity-financed banking.
Broader intellectual and methodological points
- Progress in economics comes from patiently worked out, empirically verified answers that simplify reality into actionable cause-and-effect statements—not from ad hoc “novel” ideas or political demands for the appearance of novelty.
- The mantras of the 2010s—“secular stagnation,” “modern monetary theory,” “stimulus”—are deemed invalidated by recent inflation outcomes.
- Historical perspective: Adam Smith’s ideas, described as 250-year-old, remain relevant and informative for current policy debates.
Source: How Inflation Radically Changes Economic Ideas by John Cochrane, F&D Magazine, March 2024.
Content in this bundle
- How Economics Must Change — John H. Cochrane