For the region as a whole, GDP growth is projected to reach 1.3 percent in 2016 and 2.1 percent in 2017, largely reflecting the improved outlook in CIS (see table).
Outside the CIS, growth continued at a good pace led by buoyant consumption, reflecting declining unemployment and rising wages. Credit recovery is picking up in the region.
CIS countries are turning the corner. In Russia, the contraction is set to moderate as oil prices edged up from their lows, while the rest of the European CIS members make use of improved demand for their products and services to emerge into growth.
More reforms to sustain strong growth
Nevertheless, the re-acceleration of potential growth and convergence with advanced Europe has remained a defining challenge for the region since the crisis. Current growth levels may be difficult to sustain over the medium term without increasing productivity. Still lagging investment and scarce labor supply due to an increasingly large share of elderly people weigh on medium-term growth in the region.
In countries where solid growth has continued for a number of years and unemployment rates are back to pre-crisis levels, the relatively good times should be used to reduce fiscal deficits, relying as much as possible on growth-friendly measures. As described in the spring review of the CESEE region, further structural reforms, including in the areas of legal systems and property rights, as well as enhancing government efficiency (see box) are necessary to maintain strong growth.
Better tax collection, more public investment: 4 percent more GDP
Emerging Europe has proved less efficient in public investment management and tax compliance than its peers in advanced western economies. For example, there are gaps in selecting and implementing public investment projects as well as in collecting taxes that are rightly owed to the government.
Therefore, making government more efficient will hit two birds with one stone. Improving public investment management institutions and tax administration can help create fiscal space that can be used to boost public investment or reduce the elevated fiscal deficits. High quality public investment, in turn, can help boost potential growth and improve living standards.
Closing these efficiency gaps can bring sizable benefits. If the quality of public investment management and tax administration is raised to the level of countries with best practice, CESEE countries could generate between 2 and 4 percent of GDP of additional resources over the medium term. If these resources are used for investment, it could increase GDP by a similar order. There are also broader benefits from having better public institutions, including a smaller shadow economy.
