A mild recovery supported by accommodative monetary and fiscal policies
is underway. But the output gap is large, public debt is high and
increasing, and, more importantly, medium-term growth prospects remain
uninspiring, absent further reforms. Against the backdrop of tightening
global financial conditions, placing Brazil on a path of strong,
balanced and durable growth requires an earnest pursuit of fiscal
consolidation, ambitious structural reforms, and a
strengthening of the financial sector architecture.
This will require strong leadership and resolve. Recent measures,
notably the ceiling on federal expenditures, and reforms of the labor
and subsidized credit markets are welcome and should help boost
confidence, but much more is needed. Over the near term, since
inflation is below target and expectations are anchored, monetary
policy should remain accommodative to facilitate a durable recovery,
while fiscal consolidation should accelerate. The exchange rate should
remain flexible to absorb external shocks.
A mild recovery is underway supported by accommodative policies
. Monetary policy remains accommodative in the context of a large output
gap and historically low inflation. The fiscal stance is also supportive
with the primary deficit projected to widen from 1.7 to 2.4 percent of GDP
in 2018, as implied by the budget. GDP growth is projected to accelerate
from 1 percent in 2017 to about 2 percent in 2018, driven by private
consumption and investment.
The financial sector has proven to be resilient, yet bank credit
recovery is lagging
. Despite the severity of the 2015-16 recession, banks remain well
capitalized, profitable, and liquidity indicators are good. Public banks
are reducing lending after the big expansion during the crisis, but private
banks and capital markets are taking up the slack. Bank credit is
increasing for households but continues contracting for nonfinancial
corporates, which have lower profitability and liquidity than before the
crisis. Though nonfinancial corporates remain vulnerable to shocks, banks
have sufficient buffers to absorb possible losses.
The government has undertaken key policy actions to boost confidence
and increase potential growth
. The ceiling on federal primary expenditures provides a basis for fiscal
adjustment over the next few years. The introduction of the market-based
long-term interest rate (TLP) and the government-mandated reduction of
BNDES’s balance sheets are reducing distortions in the credit market. The
labor market reform has lowered ligation costs and increased flexibility.
External buffers are substantial
. At over USD 370bn, reserves are large. The current account deficit
declined to ½ percent of GDP in 2017, largely because of import
contraction, and is projected to widen modestly to around 2 percent of GDP
in the medium term and financed comfortably by sustained foreign direct
investment. Public debt is predominantly denominated in reais, and
external rollover needs for private and public debt are low, at about 8
percent of GDP per year. These factors, together with a flexible exchange
rate, buttress Brazil’s resilience to external shocks.
The crisis had severe social costs
. After falling for years, inequality and poverty increased during the
crisis. Unemployment has fallen from its peak but is still above 12
percent, and the number of discouraged workers is very high. Jobless rates
are significantly higher among the young, women, and Afro-Brazilians. As
the recovery of formal employment is slow, many are seeking informal jobs
or self-employment, without adequate social protection.
Downside risks prevail.
The recovery is still fragile and shocks could weigh on growth. Failure to
proceed expeditiously with fiscal consolidation and pass urgent reforms
could undermine confidence, causing a sudden tightening of financial
conditions and an attendant contraction in growth. The repeated failure to
pass a strong pension reform, which is key for ensuring fiscal
sustainability, remains a key risk. The rapid depreciation of some emerging
market currencies is a reminder that external conditions can change
swiftly, compounding the effect of domestic political uncertainty.
A more equitable, sustainable, and pro-growth fiscal policy
Fiscal consolidation should be strengthened
. Under staff’s baseline scenario, which assumes that
reforms to comply with the expenditure ceiling are implemented, the primary
balance improves from a deficit of 2.4 percent of GDP in 2018 to a surplus
of 0.5 percent of GDP in 2023. Over this period, public debt is projected
to grow from 84 percent of GDP in 2017 to above 90 percent of GDP. To
secure sustainability and rebuild buffers, the government should pursue a
faster pace of consolidation and avoid a widening of the primary deficit in
2018. This is especially important given the debt dynamics and tightening
global financial conditions.
Pension
reform is essential for securing fiscal sustainability and to ensure
fairness.
At almost 60 percent of the federal primary spending, social security
expenditure is very high, increasing, and unsustainable—Brazil is a clear
outlier across most emerging market economies, including in Latin America.
A comprehensive reform should aim at increasing the retirement age,
delinking the minimum pension from the minimum wage,
and moderating the undue generosity of pensions for some segments of the
populations, notably public employees. Such reform will improve equity and
subnational government finances.
Additional expenditure measures are needed to comply with the ceiling.
The 2019 revision of the minimum wage adjustment formula provides an
opportunity to contain mandatory spending. Moreover, reforms of public
sector employment and compensation are needed to make the wage bill
sustainable, reduce labor market distortions, and alleviate income
inequality. Spending efficiency should be increased to create fiscal space,
even as expenditures for effective social programs, including Bolsa Familia, and public investment are protected and, if
possible, increased.
Tax measures aimed at improving efficiency and bolstering revenues
should be prioritized
. In particular, consideration should be given to eliminating tax
expenditures, which cost about 4 percent of GDP, expediting plans to
simplify the tax system, including the PIS/CONFINS reforms, and continuing
efforts to harmonize the federal and state tax regimes.
The fiscal framework needs to be strengthened further
. Recent measures to increase transparency taken by the National Treasury,
the Court of Accounts, and the Independent Fiscal Institution are welcome.
Further steps should include the introduction of common accounting
standards across subnational governments, a medium-term budget framework,
and greater budget flexibility. Fiscal rules should be consistent with the
medium-term consolidation objective.
Monetary policy should remain accommodative
The monetary stance is appropriate.
With inflation below target, reflecting the large output gap, and inflation
expectations well-anchored, monetary policy should remain accommodative.
Any change in the monetary policy stance should be data-dependent and based
on an assessment of risks to inflation, taking into consideration both
external factors and progress with fiscal consolidation. Enhancing central
bank independence would further improve the inflation-targeting framework.
The flexible exchange rate regime is an important cornerstone of the
policy framework.
Intervention in the foreign exchange market should be limited solely to
addressing excessive market volatility. International reserves at the
current level provide an important buffer against large external shocks.
Monetary policy should respond to movements in the exchange rate only
insofar as there are clear risks for inflation expectations.
Strengthening the financial sector architecture
The underpinnings of the banking sector should be strengthened.
The 2018 FSAP found banks to be broadly resilient to severe macro financial
shocks. The authorities have implemented key reforms to strengthen
supervision and regulation at both micro and systemic levels. However,
independence of the BCB and legal protection of its staff would strengthen
micro-prudential and safety net frameworks. The regulatory and supervisory
approach should be upgraded to address related party exposures and
transactions, large exposures, country and transfer risk, and restructured
loans. Creating multi-agency committees with mandates for macroprudential
policy and crisis management should be on the agenda.
The safety net framework should be improved.
In particular, a new financial resolution regime in line with the FSAP
recommendations should be put in place promptly. The process for providing
emergency liquidity assistance should be tightened to avoid the risk of
such assistance being provided to insolvent banks. In addition, the deposit
guarantee fund should be brought into the public sector to help prevent
conflict of interest and retain the mandate for financial stability in the
public sector.
Further structural reforms would raise growth substantively
Advancing the structural reform agenda requires setting clear
priorities.
Brazil faces a long list of structural reforms that can boost productivity,
but prioritization is key. Staff underscores the importance of measures to
improve financial intermediation, enhance trade integration, and tackle
corruption.
Improving financial intermediation will increase productivity.
The FSAP found that high operating costs, large credit losses, as well
as other factors, increase intermediation costs.
The mission welcomes government plans to reduce bank costs by implementing
a new corporate bankruptcy law, electronic collateral registration and a
positive credit registry. In addition, recent enhancements in portability
will foster financial intermediation and a new regulation on Fintechs will
ease market entry and foster bank competition. Despite these improvements,
further actions are needed to facilitate client mobility, for example by
improving the transparency and comparability of financial products.
Trade openness and investment in infrastructure are needed.
Brazil remains a closed economy, lagging significantly behind other G20
countries with regard to both intra- and inter-regional integration. In
this context, recent advances in trade facilitation and progress in
finalizing new trade arrangements are welcome. In addition, Brazil’s
infrastructure and competitiveness compare poorly with its trading
competitors, underscoring the need to advance the implementation of the
Investment Partnership Program, mindful of fiscal risks.
The effective implementation of anti-money laundering and
anti-corruption measures is critically important
. The government continues to make successful efforts to pursue significant
money laundering and corruption cases, backed by a strong and independent
judiciary. These efforts are supported by legislative changes and
jurisprudence that aim to increase the efficiency of the legal framework,
although a national risk assessment has not been completed. The government
is encouraged to continue focusing on prevention, including through
implementing beneficial ownership information requirements, further
enhancing risk-based financial sector supervision and the sharing of
financial and tax information among relevant competent authorities, and
increasing government transparency through the transparency portal.
The mission is grateful to the authorities and other counterparts for
excellent discussions.