On January 28, 2019 the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) concluded the 2018 discussion on the common policies of the Eastern
Caribbean Currency Union (ECCU) in the context of the Article IV
consultations with member countries.
[1]
The region is gradually recovering following the catastrophic impact of
Hurricanes Irma and Maria in 2017. Tourist inflows are
slowly picking up in hurricane-struck countries and have remained strong
elsewhere. Conditions remain favorable to growth, but risks are increasing.
The fiscal position has deteriorated, reflecting lower inflows from
citizenship-by-investment programs and larger reconstruction and current
spending, and the ECCU debt target of 60 percent of GDP by 2030 remains
elusive for most countries. Despite important progress on financial sector
reform, persistent weaknesses and emerging risks weigh on growth prospects
and may give rise to fiscal liabilities. External imbalances remain large,
highlighting lack of competitiveness and the impact of natural disasters.
Executive Board Assessment
[2]
Executive Directors welcomed the favorable short‑term outlook supported by
benign external conditions and the recovery from natural disasters. They
noted, however, significant risks from the ECCU’s exposure to global
developments, natural disasters that are increasing in frequency and
intensity, a further decline of correspondent banking relationships, and
lingering problems in the financial sector. Directors encouraged policy
actions to address fiscal and external vulnerabilities, build ex-ante
resilience to natural disasters, resolve weaknesses in the financial
sector, and improve competitiveness and sustainable growth.
Directors noted that, despite an overall decline in public debt, the 2030
regional benchmark of 60 percent of GDP remains elusive for most countries.
This underscores the need for sustained fiscal consolidation and further
enhancing revenue mobilization. Directors recommended the adoption of
robust fiscal responsibility frameworks anchored by the debt objective and
supported by appropriately‑tailored operational medium‑term fiscal balance
targets and escape clauses to allow flexibility. Such frameworks would help
secure fiscal sustainability, reduce pro‑cyclical policy bias, break the
vicious cycle between high debt and low growth, and build much‑needed
fiscal space for high‑priority spending, including to bolster resilience to
natural disasters. In this context, Directors took positive note that most
ECCU countries have prepared medium‑term fiscal frameworks and are weighing
the merits of adopting fiscal responsibility legislation.
Directors concurred that building ex-ante resilience to climate change and
natural disasters is a key priority. They agreed that shifting the focus
from post‑disaster recovery to ex-ante preparedness can yield substantial
benefits in the long term. Investment in resilient infrastructure would
reduce damages and losses from disasters, promote private investment, and
reduce outward migration. Similarly, building financial resilience, notably
through insurance, would ensure liquidity for relief and reconstruction,
while protecting public finances from the impact of disasters. While these
policies will impose upfront costs, Directors noted that coherent and
credible resilience‑building strategies, buttressed by efforts to
consolidate the fiscal position and enhance public investment management,
will help catalyze the necessary concessional financing from the
international community, including climate funds.
Directors welcomed progress on the regional financial sector agenda but
noted that persistent weaknesses and emerging risks require further timely
action. They highlighted the need to reduce bank nonperforming loans,
including by fully operationalizing the Eastern Caribbean Asset Management
Company, enhancing the foreclosure and insolvency frameworks, and ensuring
enforcement of prudential standards. Directors also underscored the need to
reduce risks of further withdrawals of correspondent banking relationships,
de‑risking of downstream financial institutions by banks, and exit of
foreign banks. They stressed that ensuring compliance with AML/CFT
standards will be crucial in this regard. Directors also called for
expeditiously finalizing harmonized legislation for the non‑bank financial
sector including credit unions, and an effective consolidation of regional
financial sector oversight. Continuing to strengthen the governance of
Citizenship‑By‑Investment programs will also be important.
In addition to fiscal consolidation, Directors underlined the importance of
structural reforms to improve the competitiveness of the ECCU in the
context of the quasi‑currency board. They underscored the need to reduce
the high costs of doing business, and the costs of energy, transportation,
and tariffs; improve public sector efficiency; and address high structural
unemployment. Further regional integration would help capture economies of
scale and reduce costs.
Directors agreed that the views they expressed today will form part of
their discussions in the context of the Article IV consultations with
individual ECCU members that ll take place until the next Board discussion
of ECCU common policies.
ECCU: Selected Economic and Financial Indicators, 2014–24 1/
|
Social and Demographic Indicators (ECCU-6 only)
|
|
|
Population (2017)
|
|
|
Health (per 1,000 people)
|
|
|
|
|
Total (thousands)
|
|
627.9
|
Physicians (latest weighted avg.
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
Annual rate of growth, 2000−2017 (percent)
|
|
2.1
|
Hospital beds (2011 weighted avg.
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life expectancy at birth (years)
|
|
74.1
|
|
|
|
Population characteristics
|
|
GDP (2017)
|
|
|
|
|
Crude birth rate (per thousand, latest weighted avg.)
|
16.3
|
In nominal US$ millions
|
6,754
|
|
|
|
Crude death rate (per thousand, latest weighted avg.)
|
7.5
|
Per capita
|
10,756
|
|
|
|
Arable land (percent of land area, 2011 weighted avg.)
|
9.3
|
Area (sq. km, 2013)
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prel.
|
|
|
|
Proj.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
|
|
|
(Annual percentage change)
|
|
|
|
National income and prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real GDP
|
3.6
|
2.1
|
3.4
|
1.4
|
2.2
|
3.9
|
3.1
|
2.5
|
2.3
|
2.2
|
2.1
|
|
|
GDP deflator
|
1.9
|
3.3
|
1.0
|
1.3
|
1.8
|
2.0
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.9
|
1.9
|
2.0
|
|
|
Potential GDP growth (HP filter)
|
1.8
|
2.0
|
2.1
|
2.3
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
|
Consumer prices, average
|
1.1
|
-0.8
|
-0.8
|
1.1
|
1.8
|
1.9
|
1.7
|
1.8
|
1.9
|
1.9
|
1.8
|
|
|
Monetary sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities to the private sector (M2)
|
8.2
|
4.1
|
0.8
|
4.6
|
4.0
|
5.0
|
4.5
|
4.4
|
4.2
|
4.1
|
4.2
|
|
|
Net foreign assets
|
42.5
|
31.7
|
13.3
|
15.6
|
5.8
|
4.0
|
1.8
|
4.4
|
6.8
|
7.0
|
7.5
|
|
|
Of which: Central bank
|
20.8
|
10.6
|
8.4
|
3.3
|
6.1
|
5.5
|
0.9
|
1.3
|
4.1
|
6.1
|
5.4
|
|
|
Of which: Commercial banks (net)
|
248.9
|
101.3
|
22.2
|
35.2
|
5.4
|
2.2
|
3.0
|
8.2
|
10.0
|
8.0
|
9.8
|
|
|
Net domestic assets
|
-3.3
|
-9.5
|
-8.1
|
-5.0
|
2.0
|
6.2
|
7.5
|
4.3
|
1.5
|
0.9
|
0.3
|
|
|
Of which: Private sector credit
|
-4.6
|
-4.3
|
-6.5
|
-0.1
|
0.6
|
1.3
|
1.2
|
1.6
|
1.8
|
1.9
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
(In percent of GDP)
|
|
|
|
Public sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary central government balance (incl. natural
disasters)
|
1.4
|
3.1
|
4.3
|
2.5
|
2.4
|
-1.3
|
-0.9
|
-0.8
|
-0.8
|
-1.0
|
-1.1
|
|
|
excl. Citizenship by Investment Prog.
|
-1.2
|
-0.9
|
0.1
|
-0.7
|
-0.9
|
-2.7
|
-2.1
|
-1.7
|
-1.6
|
-1.6
|
-1.6
|
|
|
Overall central government balance (incl. natural
disasters)
|
-1.4
|
0.5
|
1.8
|
0.1
|
-0.2
|
-3.5
|
-3.2
|
-3.2
|
-3.3
|
-3.6
|
-3.8
|
|
|
excl. Citizenship by Investment Prog.
|
-3.9
|
-3.5
|
-2.4
|
-3.1
|
-3.5
|
-5.0
|
-4.4
|
-4.1
|
-4.0
|
-4.2
|
-4.3
|
|
|
Total revenue and grants
|
26.7
|
28.4
|
29.3
|
28.1
|
28.0
|
25.9
|
24.9
|
24.5
|
24.3
|
23.9
|
23.8
|
|
|
Total expenditure and net lending
|
28.0
|
27.9
|
27.5
|
28.1
|
28.2
|
28.5
|
27.2
|
26.8
|
26.6
|
26.6
|
26.6
|
|
|
Foreign financing
|
1.1
|
-0.6
|
0.1
|
0.8
|
0.9
|
1.2
|
1.0
|
0.3
|
0.0
|
-0.1
|
-0.1
|
|
|
Domestic financing including arrears
|
0.1
|
0.3
|
1.0
|
1.4
|
2.5
|
1.9
|
2.0
|
2.3
|
2.5
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
|
|
Central government current account balance
|
0.8
|
2.0
|
3.3
|
2.0
|
1.5
|
-0.2
|
-0.1
|
-0.2
|
-0.3
|
-0.3
|
-0.3
|
|
|
Total public debt (end-of-period) 2/
|
80.9
|
76.2
|
73.8
|
72.1
|
71.1
|
70.3
|
69.5
|
69.7
|
70.3
|
70.8
|
71.1
|
|
|
|
(Annual percentage change)
|
|
|
|
External sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exports, f.o.b.
|
n.a.
|
-12.1
|
-14.4
|
-8.1
|
4.3
|
5.6
|
5.3
|
4.5
|
5.7
|
5.0
|
5.3
|
|
|
Imports, f.o.b.
|
n.a.
|
-5.1
|
3.9
|
4.2
|
11.6
|
3.5
|
3.6
|
3.0
|
2.5
|
3.2
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
(In percent of GDP)
|
|
|
|
External current account balance
|
-5.4
|
-4.3
|
-7.7
|
-8.0
|
-8.7
|
-8.8
|
-9.3
|
-8.6
|
-7.7
|
-7.1
|
-6.7
|
|
|
Trade balance
|
-31.1
|
-28.4
|
-29.1
|
-30.0
|
-32.5
|
-31.6
|
-31.2
|
-30.7
|
-30.1
|
-29.8
|
-29.4
|
|
|
Services, incomes and transfers
|
25.7
|
24.1
|
21.4
|
22.0
|
23.7
|
22.8
|
21.9
|
22.1
|
22.4
|
22.7
|
22.7
|
|
|
Of which: Travel
|
40.2
|
38.9
|
37.3
|
37.3
|
37.9
|
38.3
|
38.5
|
38.5
|
38.6
|
38.7
|
38.7
|
|
|
Capital minus financial accounts
|
6.2
|
2.8
|
9.7
|
8.0
|
8.7
|
8.8
|
9.3
|
8.6
|
7.7
|
7.1
|
6.7
|
|
|
Of which: Foreign direct investment
|
-9.0
|
-8.6
|
-8.8
|
-7.1
|
-7.8
|
-8.0
|
-7.9
|
-7.8
|
-7.6
|
-7.5
|
-7.5
|
|
|
External public debt (end-of period)
|
44.0
|
41.0
|
40.0
|
38.5
|
38.0
|
37.1
|
36.3
|
35.9
|
35.2
|
34.6
|
33.7
|
|
|
External debt service, percent of goods and nonfactor
services
|
6.3
|
3.5
|
5.1
|
5.9
|
5.5
|
5.1
|
6.0
|
4.3
|
4.3
|
4.2
|
4.1
|
|
|
Of which: Interest
|
1.9
|
1.9
|
1.9
|
1.9
|
2.0
|
2.1
|
2.1
|
2.1
|
2.1
|
2.1
|
2.1
|
|
|
Saving-Investment Balance
|
-5.4
|
-4.3
|
-7.7
|
-8.0
|
-8.7
|
-8.8
|
-9.3
|
-8.6
|
-7.7
|
-7.1
|
-6.7
|
|
|
Saving
|
8.7
|
9.3
|
6.0
|
4.1
|
4.2
|
4.6
|
3.0
|
3.2
|
3.9
|
4.4
|
4.8
|
|
|
Investment
|
14.1
|
13.5
|
13.7
|
12.1
|
12.9
|
13.5
|
12.3
|
11.9
|
11.6
|
11.5
|
11.5
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of U.S. dollars
|
1,411
|
1,560
|
1,690
|
1,745
|
1,852
|
1,953
|
1,970
|
1,996
|
2,077
|
2,204
|
2,323
|
|
|
In months of current year imports of goods and services
|
4.7
|
5.3
|
5.4
|
5.4
|
5.4
|
5.3
|
5.2
|
5.1
|
5.1
|
5.3
|
5.4
|
|
|
In percent of broad money
|
25.3
|
26.9
|
28.9
|
28.5
|
29.1
|
29.2
|
28.2
|
27.4
|
27.4
|
27.9
|
28.2
|
|
|
REER (average annual percentage change)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade-weighted
|
0.0
|
6.5
|
-2.3
|
-4.2
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
|
Competitor-weighted
|
1.8
|
0.4
|
0.3
|
-0.2
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
|
Customer-weighted
|
-0.8
|
3.1
|
2.0
|
-0.3
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
|
Memo items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imputed cost of natural disasters (percent of GDP)
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
|
|
Sources: Country authorities; and Fund staff estimates and
projections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/ Includes all eight ECCU members unless otherwise noted.
ECCU price aggregates are calculated as weighted averages
of individual country data. Other ECCU aggregates are calculated by adding individual country data.
|
|
|
|
2/ Debt relief has been accorded to: (i) Grenada under the
ECF-supported program in 2017; and (ii) St. Vincent and the
Grenadines in 2017 and Antigua and Barbuda in 2018 under
the Petrocaribe arrangement.
|
[1]
Under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds
bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. In the
context of these bilateral Article IV consultation discussion,
staff hold separate annual discussions with the regional
institutions responsible for common policies in four currency
unions – the Euro Area, the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union, the
Central African Economic and Monetary Union, and the West African
Economic and Monetary Union. For each of the currency unions, staff
teams visit the regional institutions responsible for common
policies in the currency union, collects economic and financial
information, and discusses with officials the currency union’s
economic developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the
staff prepares a report, which forms the basis of discussion by the
Executive Board. Both staff’s discussions with the regional
institutions and the Board discussion of the annual staff report
will be considered an integral part of the Article IV consultation
with each member.
[2]
At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as
Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors,
and this summary is transmitted to the country's authorities. An
explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found
here: http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm.