Washington, DC:
The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the
Article IV consultation
[1]
with Mauritius on a lapse-of-time basis.
[2]
Mauritius has been gradually recovering from the pandemic. The authorities
have successfully managed the health impact of the pandemic and vaccinated
most of the population. Real GDP expanded by 4 percent in 2021 as many
sectors recovered to pre-pandemic levels of economic activity while the
tourism sector remained subdued. Against this backdrop, the current account
deficit widened substantially. Fiscal performance is expected to improve in
FY2021/22 helped by quasi-fiscal operations although the pandemic and new
pressures on current spending burden the fiscal balance. Inflation
increased substantially from 2.7 percent at end-2020 to 6.8 percent at
end-2021 and further to 11 percent at end-April 2022. The financial sector,
including the Global Business Companies (GBCs) segment was stable in 2021.
Mauritius exited from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) list of
jurisdictions under increased monitoring in October 2021 and the analogous
EU and UK lists soon after.
Staff projects real GDP growth of 6.1 percent in 2022. The economic rebound
is expected to be driven primarily by the tourism sector with tourist
arrivals expected at 60 percent of pre-pandemic levels. Unemployment is
expected to decline as the economy recovers and to return to trend in the
medium-term. Annual inflation is expected to rise to 11.4 percent in 2022
due to surging commodity prices, past depreciation of the rupee, and
recovering domestic demand. The economy is expected to converge to its
pre-pandemic trend growth of 3-3½ per- cent in the medium term.
The outlook for Mauritius is subject to downside risks, including due to
the war in Ukraine. Rising global inflation reduces real disposable income
and may weigh on global demand, including for tourism, and freight costs.
Executive Board Assessment
In concluding the Article IV consultation with Mauritius, Executive
Directors endorsed the staff’s appraisal as follows:
The economy is recovering from the pandemic following a substantial
contraction in 2020. The health impact of the pandemic was successfully
managed, including by a remarkable vaccination campaign covering over 90
percent of the eligible population by May 2022. Economic growth has started
to recover, with most sectors broadly back to pre-pandemic output levels,
except tourism, where activity remains subdued.
The key macroeconomic challenge for Mauritius is to continue its economic
recovery, while controlling inflation in a global environment with high
fuel and food prices and slower recovery. The recovery in Mauritius is
expected to continue, albeit at a slower pace than projected before the war
in Ukraine, reflecting lower growth in trading partners, less optimistic
prospects for tourist flows, and worsening terms of trade. Inflation has
picked up substantially due to global supply bottlenecks, higher fuel and
food prices, freight costs, and the past depreciation of the rupee.
The fiscal consolidation path needs to be carefully calibrated to balance
recovery from the pandemic with long-term fiscal and debt sustainability.
Adhering to fiscal rules remains critical to preserve fiscal sustainability
and reduce debt vulnerabilities in the medium term. Public debt is elevated
after increasing during the pandemic. Fiscal performance continues to be
impacted by the pandemic and renewed pressures on current spending.
Targeted transfers to the vulnerable may be needed in the face of sharp
increases in food and fuel prices. If the economy continues to recover,
revenue should increase and spending be reduced, including through pension
system reform, to put debt on a declining path in the medium term.
The monetary policy normalization cycle needs to proceed to minimize
potential second-round effects from supply-side shocks and to control
inflation in the medium term. Supply-side pressures on inflation and
inflation expectations have presented a challenge post pandemic. The war in
Ukraine adds to these pressures and will require engineering tighter policy
in an increasingly complicated environment.
The monetary policy framework needs to be modernized and credibility and
independence of the central bank to be safeguarded. Staff recommends that
the new monetary policy framework be rolled out soon to support policy
effectiveness. Consistent with the inflation targeting framework, the Bank
of Mauritius’ (BOM’s) FX intervention strategy should aim to smooth
volatility while generally allowing for exchange rate flexibility,
facilitating macroeconomic adjustment. The government needs to recapitalize
the BOM per existing legislation for the BOM to accommodate the monetary
policy costs. To strengthen the central bank’s operational independence and
financial position, the reform of the BOM law should prohibit central
bank’s transfers to the government and quasi-fiscal financing.
Relinquishing the BOM ownership of the MIC would also help in this regard.
The external position of Mauritius at end-2021 was substantially weaker
than is suggested by fundamentals and desirable policies, although official
foreign reserves remained broadly adequate. The current account gap was
large and negative, pointing to substantial overvaluation of the rupee
compared to its level consistent with the long-term fundamentals. The
external assessment remains highly uncertain due to the transitory supply
shock to tourism. The financing of the current account will continue to
depend on the financial and capital flows in the GBC sector. While the
successful exit from the AML/CFT listings of FATF, EU, and the UK should
support the flows, the indirect impact of sanctions on Russia may pose
risks.
Mauritius should embrace structural transformation to continue along the
path to sustainable and resilient long-term growth. Priorities should be on
enhancing diversification and competitiveness, including greater
digitalization of the economy and adaptation and mitigation policies to
tackle climate change vulnerabilities.
|
Mauritius: Selected Economic and Financial Indicators,
2019-2023
|
|
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
|
|
National income, prices, and employment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real GDP (percentage change)
|
3.0
|
-14.9
|
4.0
|
6.1
|
5.6
|
|
|
Consumer prices (period average, percentage
change)
|
0.5
|
2.5
|
4.0
|
11.9
|
5.8
|
|
|
Unemployment rate (percent)
|
6.7
|
9.2
|
9.5
|
7.8
|
7.5
|
|
|
Money and credit (percent change)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foreign assets
|
13.5
|
16.4
|
18.6
|
2.0
|
-1.3
|
|
|
Net claims on government
|
-3.8
|
8.8
|
34.8
|
7.5
|
9.5
|
|
|
Credit to non-government sector
|
17.1
|
2.7
|
-0.4
|
5.5
|
8.2
|
|
|
Broad money
|
6.2
|
17.7
|
8.6
|
1.9
|
4.0
|
|
|
Central government finances 1 (percent of GDP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall borrowing requirement 2
|
-13.1
|
-23.1
|
-7.6
|
-3.9
|
-6.1
|
|
|
Revenues, including grants
|
22.7
|
22.7
|
24.0
|
23.9
|
23.8
|
|
|
Expenditure, excluding net lending
|
34.5
|
42.3
|
33.1
|
29.5
|
29.5
|
|
|
External sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current account balance (percent of GDP)
|
-5.1
|
-9.2
|
-13.7
|
-13.5
|
-8.1
|
|
|
Gross international reserves (millions of
U.S. dollars)
|
7,329
|
7,242
|
8,513
|
6,801
|
6,371
|
|
|
Memorandum items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP at current market prices (billions of
Mauritian rupees)
|
498.3
|
429.7
|
465.1
|
520.1
|
581.3
|
|
|
Public sector debt, fiscal year (percent of
GDP)
|
84.6
|
99.2
|
92.4
|
88.1
|
86.1
|
|
|
Sources: Country authorities; and IMF staff
estimates and projections
1
GFSM 2001
concept of net lending/net borrowing,
includes special and other extrabudgetary
funds. Fiscal data reported for fiscal
years (e.g., 2018=2018/19).
2
Following the GFSM 2014, Sections
5.111.5.116, the transfers from the BOM to
the Central Government are considered as
financing.
|
|
[1]
Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds
bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff
team visits the country, collects economic and financial
information, and discusses with officials the country's economic
developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff
prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the
Executive Board.
[2]
The Executive Board takes decisions under its lapse-of-time
procedure when the Board agrees that a proposal can be considered
without convening formal discussions.