Washington, DC:
On July 27, 2022, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) concluded the 2022 Article IV consultation discussions
[1]
with the Kingdom of the Netherlands—Curaçao and Sint Maarten and endorsed
the staff appraisal without a meeting on a lapse-of-time basis
[2]
. These consultation discussions form part of the Article IV consultation
with the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
Context.
Both Curaçao and Sint Maarten are recovering from major shocks. Before the
pandemic, Curaçao had been negatively affected by the closure of the
refinery, one of its major economic pillars. Sint Maarten’s recovery from
catastrophic 2017 hurricanes was incomplete. The pandemic led to the
collapse of tourism in both countries. Comprehensive economic support
measures put in place by the authorities and financed by The Netherlands
were instrumental for protecting lives and livelihoods and helped to limit
the economic fallout. A strong rebound in tourism beginning in the second
half of 2021—one of the strongest results in the Caribbean—supported a
nascent economic recovery of 4.2 percent in Curaçao and an estimated growth
of 8 percent in Sint Maarten. Despite a substantial external current
account deficit of the Union, the international reserves remained
comfortable at 6.3 months of imports. The banking system withstood the
shock from the pandemic with help from appropriate policies as it remains
relatively well capitalized and liquid, although pockets of vulnerability
remain.
Curaçao outlook.
The recovery from the pandemic is gaining momentum but is facing headwinds
from inflation pressures driven by fuel, food and other import prices. The
hospitality sector is demonstrating resilience and is likely to support
growth of about 6 percent in 2022. Lingering effects from the closure of
the refinery mean that growth is not yet broad-based and could delay full
recovery to pre-pandemic levels to 2025-26. Inflation pressures stemming
from surging global prices create headwinds. The outlook is subject to
significant uncertainty and risks.
Sint Maarten outlook.
Strong tourism recovery late last year has continued with only mild
headwinds from the latest Covid-19 developments, implying an estimated
growth of 8 percent last year and an expectation of 7½ percent growth this
year. Economic activity is expected to recover to pre-pandemic levels next
year and to pre-hurricane levels by the end of the forecast horizon.
External inflation pressures, exacerbated by the war in Ukraine, is
forecast to raise annual inflation in 2022 to nearly 6 percent. The
external current account deficit is expected to widen on tourism-related
imports and Trust Fund-related imports but close gradually going forward.
Fiscal deficits are expected to decline, and debt-to-GDP fall,
but they may reverse if the social security and health system
is not reformed. The outlook is subject to substantial risks including
shocks to tourism demand from the pandemic or partner country growth as
well as ever-present hurricane-risk.
Executive Board Assessment
Curaçao
The recovery from the pandemic is gaining momentum, although the economy is
facing multiple challenges. The comprehensive economic support measures put
in place with significant help from The Netherlands cushioned the Covid-19
shock and saved livelihoods. The authorities appropriately phased out
Covid-19 support in late 2021 as the economy started to recover.
Inflationary pressures stemming from the war in Ukraine, lingering effects
from the closure of the Isla refinery, emigration, and structural
constraints endemic to small island states pose a drag on the recovery.
Keeping a clear vision of a sustainable and inclusive growth model for
Curaçao would be key. Identifying new sources of growth would be important
for diversifying the economy, improving resilience, and achieving fiscal
sustainability. Implementing supply-side and governance reforms envisaged
in the landspakket such as improving the business climate, the
functioning of the labor market, and improving regulatory frameworks, would
be key for supporting the recovery.
Fiscal policies should be calibrated to achieve growth-friendly fiscal
consolidation and support the most vulnerable while placing public debt
firmly on a downward path. The authorities are implementing strong
frontloaded fiscal consolidation with an objective to return to their
fiscal rule next year. There is scope for improving the quality of fiscal
consolidation by budgeting adequate resources for efficient delivery of
public services and implementing reforms. As the current hiring restriction
hampers capacity to deliver public services in certain areas such as
statistics, replacing it with a structural reform to modernize Curaçao’s
civil service would work better. Increasing public investment to more
adequate levels would support employment, incentivize private investment,
and support broad-based economic recovery. Special attention is needed to
investments in climate resilience.
Adding a more medium-term perspective to policymaking and improving public
financial management will be key for supporting sustainability. Curaçao
would benefit from developing a well-articulated medium-term framework
guided by a debt anchor. In view of high vulnerability to shocks, the debt
objective could include a margin of safety to minimize the risk of debt
distress. Strengthening public financial management would be key for
ensuring fiscal sustainability. A significant improvement is needed in the
institutional setup of public investment strategy and management. Such a
framework should include a clear planning and decision-making process as
well as adequate project appraisal incorporating risks from climate change.
Sint Maarten
The recovery in Sint Maarten is underway. Stayover tourism has exceeded
pre-pandemic levels and cruise tourism is rebounding. Public investment
supported by the Trust Fund is raising the prospect of matching the level
of output seen before the 2017 hurricanes by the end of the forecast
horizon. Nevertheless, downside risks cloud the outlook. Global price
pressures are making a mark on the island and threatening real wages and
the purchasing power of the most vulnerable. Disappointing investment
execution, especially for the airport, a rebound in the economic
consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic, spillovers from a slowdown in
advanced economies, or another devastating hurricane season are key risks
that could significantly derail recent gains.
Fiscal efforts should center on a higher-quality consolidation. The public
wage bill freeze could be eased in light of the inflation shock and should
eventually be replaced by a comprehensive reform focused on productivity
and competitive wages. Attention should be given to hiring key skill areas
where positions are difficult to fill. Temporary relief to households, in
addition to the gasoline excise tax reduction, should employ more targeted
measures. These steps can be financed by needed base-broadening tax reforms
including taxes on sharing-economy holiday rentals, internet consumer
sales, and the gambling industry. Higher premiums and cost-cutting measures
are urgently needed to put the social security and health insurance system
(SZV) on a sustainable financial footing and avoid becoming a fiscal burden
in the medium-term.
Medium-term fiscal planning and institution-building would serve Sint
Maarten well. Developing a medium-term fiscal framework, including
establishing an appropriate debt anchor, would aid fiscal planning,
coordinate expectations across the government, and facilitate investment
project costing and financing. Sint Maarten should leverage the period of
Trust Fund execution to build public investment management capacity. It
will need to improve its public investment levels in the long run to secure
sustained growth.
Increasing dynamism for businesses and workers and supporting green
investment would help sustain the recovery. As the economy recovers from
the pandemic, long run growth concerns return to the fore. Private sector
dynamism would be supported by reducing barriers to new business and
simplifying, centralizing, and speeding up permitting. Barriers to formal
work should be reduced by increasing flexibility to multiple jobs and
seasonal work as well as easing hiring and firing restrictions. Green
infrastructure investments would support growth while improving Sint
Maarten’s living environment and global brand.
The Monetary Union of Curaçao and Sint Maarten
The external position of the union has improved on the heels of a nascent
recovery. The Union’s current account deficit declined, and international
reserves remain at a comfortable level. Nevertheless, the external
positions in both countries remain weaker than warranted by the
fundamentals and desired policy settings. Across-the-board supply-side
reforms remain vital for strengthening the external position of the union,
as official financing is expected to wind down.
Monetary policy should continue supporting the peg. The CBCS has
appropriately raised the reference rate in June 2022. Excess liquidity
should be monitored closely and sterilized if necessary. It would be
important to strengthen the transmission mechanism of monetary policy.
Improving the financial infrastructure would lower impediments to lending
and improve the productive use of deposits.
Strong implementation of financial sector reforms would help to alleviate
financial sector vulnerabilities. The financial system withstood the shock
from the pandemic with help from appropriate policies. Nevertheless, the
pandemic took a toll on asset quality and financial sector vulnerabilities
and risks remain elevated as the macro environment remains volatile. The
authorities have made significant efforts in advancing their financial
sector agenda, including transitioning to risk-based supervision,
addressing legacy issues, and improving analysis and transparency. These
efforts need to continue. Strong collaboration between the CBCS and the
government is critical for addressing remaining legacy issues and advancing
financial sector reforms. Continued monitoring of correspondent bank
relationships remains important for the healthy functioning of the system.
|
Table 1. Curaçao: Selected Economic and Financial
Indicators, 2018–23
|
|
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
|
|
|
Prel.
|
Prel.
|
Prel.
|
Prel.
|
Proj.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Economy
|
(Percent change unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
Real GDP
|
-2.2
|
-3.4
|
-18.4
|
4.2
|
6.0
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPI (12-month average)
|
2.6
|
2.6
|
2.2
|
3.8
|
6.8
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPI (end of period)
|
3.6
|
2.3
|
2.2
|
4.8
|
7.2
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP deflator
|
2.6
|
2.7
|
2.1
|
3.8
|
1.7
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unemployment rate (percent)
|
13.4
|
17.4
|
19.1
|
19.7
|
19.2
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Government Finances
|
(Percent of GDP)
|
|
Net operating (current) balance
|
-1.3
|
-0.5
|
-15.2
|
-6.9
|
-1.9
|
-0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary balance
|
-1.5
|
-0.4
|
-13.4
|
-4.7
|
-1.2
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall balance
|
-2.6
|
-1.6
|
-14.7
|
-6.0
|
-2.5
|
-0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central government debt 1/
|
56.4
|
57.9
|
88.4
|
89.2
|
83.3
|
76.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Government Finances 2/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall balance
|
-2.5
|
-2.0
|
-15.9
|
-6.9
|
-5.6
|
-1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of Payments
|
(Percent of GDP)
|
|
Current account
|
-26.9
|
-18.0
|
-27.6
|
-21.9
|
-21.6
|
-17.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goods trade balance
|
-38.8
|
-35.5
|
-37.6
|
-42.2
|
-51.0
|
-48.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exports of goods
|
19.4
|
13.3
|
10.9
|
12.7
|
16.0
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imports of goods
|
58.2
|
48.8
|
48.4
|
54.9
|
67.0
|
63.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service balance
|
11.9
|
16.9
|
9.8
|
18.7
|
27.8
|
29.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exports of services
|
44.7
|
46.0
|
29.8
|
34.6
|
45.2
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imports of services
|
32.7
|
29.0
|
20.0
|
15.9
|
17.3
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
External debt
|
157.4
|
162.0
|
216.6
|
215.9
|
205.9
|
193.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net international investment position
|
251.5
|
173.4
|
183.5
|
147.6
|
115.3
|
87.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memorandum Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominal GDP (millions of U.S. dollars)
|
3,020
|
2,995
|
2,496
|
2,700
|
2,911
|
3,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per capita GDP (U.S. dollars)
|
19,037
|
19,173
|
16,244
|
17,870
|
19,160
|
20,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit to non-gov. sectors (percent change)
3/
|
2.5
|
2.0
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
-0.6
|
…
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources: Data provided by the authorities;
and IMF staff estimates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/ Defined as balance sheet liabilities of
the central government except equities.
Includes central government liabilities to
the social security funds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/ Budgetary central government
consolidated with the social security fund
(SVB).
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/ 2020-21 values exclude Girobank. 2022
value shows the latest available data
(April).
|
|
|
Table 2. Sint Maarten: Selected
Economic and Financial Indicators,
2018–23
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prel.
|
Est.
|
Est.
|
Est.
|
Proj.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Economy
|
|
|
(Percent change, unless
otherwise noted)
|
|
|
Real GDP 1/
|
|
|
-9.4
|
10.5
|
-17.9
|
8.0
|
7.5
|
5.0
|
|
|
CPI (12-month average)
|
|
|
2.9
|
0.4
|
0.7
|
2.8
|
5.9
|
3.5
|
|
|
Unemployment rate (percent)
|
|
9.9
|
8.5
|
16.8
|
13.0
|
11.2
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Finances
|
|
|
(Percent of GDP)
|
|
|
Primary balance excl. Trust
Fund operations 2/
|
-3.8
|
-0.7
|
-9.3
|
-6.0
|
-3.7
|
-2.3
|
|
|
Current balance
(Authorities' definition)
3/
|
-4.5
|
-1.5
|
-10.4
|
-6.9
|
-4.2
|
-2.9
|
|
|
Overall balance excl. TF
operations
|
|
-4.4
|
-1.3
|
-10.0
|
-6.6
|
-4.2
|
-2.9
|
|
|
Central government debt 4/
|
|
|
47.2
|
43.3
|
59.9
|
60.9
|
63.1
|
60.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of Payments
|
|
|
(Percent of GDP)
|
|
|
Current account
|
|
|
6.7
|
-13.3
|
-27.2
|
-16.5
|
-22.2
|
-19.7
|
|
|
Goods trade balance
|
|
|
-69.6
|
-59.7
|
-43.7
|
-35.0
|
-50.0
|
-45.6
|
|
|
Exports of goods
|
|
|
13.4
|
14.5
|
12.6
|
8.0
|
7.9
|
8.3
|
|
|
Imports of goods
|
|
|
83.0
|
74.2
|
56.3
|
43.0
|
57.9
|
54.0
|
|
|
Service balance
|
|
|
31.7
|
48.0
|
21.7
|
23.6
|
38.4
|
40.3
|
|
|
Exports of services
|
|
|
58.9
|
72.7
|
37.0
|
36.1
|
52.7
|
54.2
|
|
|
Imports of services
|
|
|
27.2
|
24.7
|
15.3
|
12.5
|
14.3
|
13.9
|
|
|
External debt
|
|
|
232.4
|
217.9
|
261.6
|
238.2
|
220.9
|
205.8
|
|
|
Net international
investment position
|
-134.5
|
-134.8
|
-172.7
|
-168.4
|
-165.7
|
-163.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memorandum Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominal GDP (millions of
U.S. dollars)
|
1,108
|
1,251
|
1,062
|
1,145
|
1,283
|
1,410
|
|
|
Per capita GDP (U.S.
dollars)
|
|
|
26,920
|
29,762
|
24,935
|
26,889
|
29,765
|
32,357
|
|
|
Credit to non-gov. sectors
(percent change) 5/
|
-1.7
|
1.4
|
2.4
|
1.3
|
2.1
|
…
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources: Data provided by
the authorities; World
Bank; and IMF staff
estimates.
|
|
|
1/ GDP estimates for 2019
and 2020 reflect the
authorities' recently
released growth estimates
and IMF staff's deflator
estimates in anticipation
of the forthcoming update
to the authorities'
estimates.
|
|
|
2/ Excludes Trust Fund (TF)
grants and TF-financed
special projects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/ Revenue excl. grants
minus interest income,
current expenditure and
depreciation of fixed
assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/ The stock of debt in
2018 is based on financial
statements. Values in
subsequent years are
staff's estimates and are
higher than the values
under authorities'
definition in quarterly
fiscal reports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/ 2022 value shows the
latest available data
(April).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]
Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds
bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff
team visits the country, collects economic and financial
information, and discusses with officials the country's economic
developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff
prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the
Executive Board.
[2]
The Executive Board takes decisions under its
lapse-of-time-procedure when the Board agrees that a proposal can
be considered without convening formal discussions.