Washington, DC: On November 20, 2023,
the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) discussed the
staff report: “Review of the Fund’s Strategy on Anti-Money Laundering and
Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT).” The staff report takes
stock of the implementation of the Fund’s AML/CFT program adopted by the
Executive Board in 2018, identifies lessons learned, and seeks the
Executive Board’s endorsement of the proposals for the way forward. The
report provides an overview of the current approach by staff towards money
laundering (ML) and terrorism financing (TF) risks and context, followed by
an in-depth analysis of staff’s work under key Fund
workstreams—surveillance, financial sector assessment programs (FSAPs),
Fund-supported programs, AML/CFT assessments, and capacity development
(CD). It also describes how AML/CFT issues have been integrated into other
Fund policies and how staff has contributed to the global AML/CFT agenda
through close coordination with other stakeholders to leverage synergies
and avoid duplication of work. Based on these findings, the paper proposes
the way forward for the Fund’s AML/CFT strategy by deepening further the
integration of financial integrity issues in the Fund’s core functions
through enhanced focus on AML/CFT issues that have macroeconomic impact and
sets out issues for discussion.
Since the 2018 review of the Fund’s AML/CFT strategy, the coverage of
financial integrity issues has increased across all workstreams. Staff
enhanced its understanding of ML/TF risks and of the macroeconomic impact
of financial crimes, based on a wide range of quantitative and qualitative
data, which has guided the Fund’s engagements with member countries. This
review highlights an increased coverage of AML/CFT issues in surveillance
and related conditionality in Fund-supported programs. Staff has provided
input on AML/CFT in every FSAP, making full use of the flexibility in scope
and depth afforded, and contributed to the broader discussion of the
stability and soundness of members’ financial sectors, while avoiding
duplication with AML/CFT assessments against the international standards
set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). The increase in regional,
multi country, and thematic CD projects has resulted in assistance to a
broader range of countries and enhanced flexibility for targeted and more
effective and impactful engagements. Staff’s active participation in
AML/CFT assessments by the FATF Global Network has effectively contributed
to its assessment efforts. The current policy to conduct one to two
assessments per year has allowed staff to deliver one assessment per year
given the length of these exercises, while also increasing staff’s
participation in the review of the quality and consistency of draft
assessment reports prepared by other assessor bodies which are essential
for the IMF’s work and to help ensure a more evenhanded approach in
conducting assessments, and in training assessors and assisting countries
preparing for assessments. In addition, staff has participated in an
assessment led by a FATF-style regional body, pursuant to the policy
endorsed by the Board in 2020.
Executive Board Assessment
[1]
Executive Directors welcomed the opportunity to review the Fund’s AML/CFT
Strategy. They stressed that addressing ML, TF, and proliferation financing
risks is integral to the Fund’s mandate to support the integrity and
stability of the international financial system and member countries’
economies. They welcomed the staff’s stocktaking of the progress that has
been made and the lessons learned. They agreed with the overall direction
to continue to enhance staff’s understanding of the nature and severity of
financial integrity risks, with a greater focus on assessing and mitigating
negative macroeconomic impacts, which will help staff further prioritize
the depth and scope of its engagements. They emphasized that staff should
continue to rely on the multipronged approach and synergies across the
Fund’s various workstreams to support individual member countries’ efforts
in enhancing the effectiveness of their AML/CFT frameworks.
Directors supported the proposed approach on surveillance, where staff will
put greater focus on the linkages between financial integrity issues and
fiscal, financial sector, and structural priorities. They agreed that staff
should continue to cover financial integrity issues under the current
principles of engagement and deepen its coverage in an evenhanded manner,
commensurate with the risks faced by members, on a mandatory basis when
these issues are macro-critical and on a voluntary basis when requested by
the member country. With regard to FSAPs, Directors concurred that the
current policy of mandatory coverage of AML/CFT issues with flexibility in
scope and depth remains appropriate and supported staff’s proposal to put
greater emphasis on the nexus between financial integrity and financial
stability. Directors also agreed with the proposed approach on Fund
supported programs, where staff will continue to use its own judgment and
expertise in designing financial integrity and AML/CFT conditionality in
line with program objectives and subject to the principles of criticality,
parsimony, and avoiding cross conditionality. Directors also noted the
importance of better understanding political economy constraints. A number
of Directors emphasized the need for flexibility and technical support for
members with capacity weaknesses. In this context, a few Directors
considered that it is preferable to address AML/CFT issues through tailored
CD support.
Directors welcomed the CD activities delivered by staff to member countries
and agreed that, in line with the Fund’s CD strategy, staff should continue
to provide comprehensive CD support with greater flexibility to respond to
the evolving demand from the membership and deepen support for other Fund
workstreams. They noted that a better understanding of ML/TF risks will
allow staff to continue to further develop the CD program in line with
evolving risks such as those related to digital money, laundering of the
proceeds of corruption, tax evasion, and environmental crimes. Directors
reiterated the need to continue to coordinate with other technical
assistance providers to maximize efforts and avoid duplication of efforts.
Directors concurred that staff should continue to integrate financial
integrity issues in other Fund policies. They also welcomed staff’s
proposal to deepen its engagement with a broader range of external
stakeholders, including through enhanced collaboration with other
international and regional organizations and civil society, and leverage
global and regional partnerships to maximize the impact of the Fund’s
AML/CFT work program while focusing on its comparative advantage.
Directors highlighted the importance of the Fund’s continued engagement in
AML/CFT assessments with a focus on quality and consistency. They generally
supported or were open to staff’s proposal to increase gradually its
assessment-related work, to be able to deliver two Fund-led assessments and
participate in one FSRB-led assessment per year from FY 2028 onward,
without prejudice to other core workstreams and subject to the reallocation
of resources to enable this increase. Some Directors, nonetheless,
considered the current pace of assessments to be broadly adequate.
Directors looked forward to considering staff’s proposal to increase its
assessment work in the context of the medium term budget process.
Directors noted that the next review of the AML/CFT Strategy would be
expected to be completed within the next five years.