Washington, DC: On
February 23, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
concluded the Article IV consultation
[1]
with the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM).
FSM experienced a short-lived recovery in 2021 from Covid, but economic
activity has since stagnated because of additional shocks. Economic
growth rebounded to 3 percent in FY2021, led by the fisheries sector and
government support. However, economic growth is estimated to have
averaged zero in FY2022-23. Inflation reached a decade high 6.2 percent
driven by higher import prices for fuel and food, as well as supply
bottlenecks. FSM is also facing significant labor shortages exacerbated by
outward emigration. On the other hand, the external and fiscal positions of
FSM remained robust. Substantial fiscal surpluses in recent years
contributed to a decline in public debt to 12.4 percent of GDP, while the
assets of the trust funds have risen to 323 percent of GDP.
FSM’s near-term economic prospects will get a boost from higher public
investment. Growth in FY2024 is projected at 1.1 percent before
accelerating further to 1.7 percent underpinned by continued recovery in
tourism, as well as higher public spending partly funded by the higher
grants under the new Compact of Free Association (COFA) agreement with
the United States (expected to be implemented starting in FY2025).
However, without significant reforms, economic growth is likely to
converge to the historical average of around 0.7 percent over time.
Inflation is expected to gradually decline to around 2 percent.
The FSM economy remains highly vulnerable to shocks, such as an increase
in global commodity prices, extreme climate events, and potential delays
of the COFA agreement. Moreover, the acceleration of outward migration
would severely jeopardize already constrained labor supply, impacting
implementation of large public projects. The underdeveloped private
sector remains vulnerable, and deteriorating infrastructure hinders
growth and social goals, especially on health. The adverse impact of
climate change is increasingly being felt raising food security concerns.
Executive Board Assessment[2]
Executive Directors positively noted the new Compact of Free Association
(COFA) agreement with the United States, which presents an opportunity to
adopt a transformative reform agenda, and welcomed the envisaged economic
recovery in the near term. Noting the medium-term outlook challenges
related to the country’s vulnerabilities to climate change and natural
disasters, significant structural bottlenecks, and outward emigration,
Directors underscored the need for reforms to support private sector-led
growth and pursue an enhanced climate strategy. Building social consensus
and ensuring policy coordination among all domestic stakeholders will be
important. Directors also stressed the importance of continued financial
and capacity building support by the international community.
Directors agreed that in the short term, fiscal policy should remain
cautious until the new COFA is implemented and stressed the importance of
pressing ahead with the authorities’ public financial management reform
roadmap. They recommended developing a new fiscal framework and
strengthening public investment management to enhance the implementation
and efficiency of public investment. This will help promote higher
sustainable growth while ensuring fiscal sustainability. Further
initiatives to improve revenue mobilization, such as modernizing revenue
administration and strengthening the tax system, will also be needed over
time.
Directors encouraged structural reforms to improve the business
environment, and investments in education and training, and digitalization.
They emphasized the need to prioritize land reform and reducing barriers to
foreign direct investment which is critical to promote the development of
the private sector and disincentivize outward emigration. Directors also
recommended further efforts to improve economic statistics to enhance
transparency and accountability.
Directors agreed that financial sector could play a stronger role in
supporting economic development. They welcomed its overall soundness, while
noting that further enhancing the regulatory and supervisory frameworks
could further boost its resilience. Directors also emphasized the
importance of strengthening financial deepening and inclusion to support
private sector development. Continued progress in the AML/CFT framework is
also important.
Directors agreed with the urgency to strengthen the country’s resilience to
climate change and called for prompt actions to develop and implement a
comprehensive National Adaptation Plan.
|
Table 1. Micronesia: Selected Economic Indicators,
FY2021–FY2025 1/
|
|
Nominal GDP (FY2022):
|
US$430 million
|
|
|
Population (FY2022):
|
94,768
|
|
|
GDP per capita (FY2022):
|
US$4,540
|
|
|
IMF Quota:
|
SDR 7.2 million
|
|
|
|
|
FY2021
|
FY2022
|
FY2023
|
FY2024
|
FY2025
|
|
|
|
Est.
|
Est.
|
Projections
|
|
Real sector (annual percent change)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real GDP
|
|
3.0
|
-0.9
|
0.8
|
1.1
|
1.7
|
|
Consumer prices
|
|
1.8
|
5.0
|
6.2
|
4.0
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated government finance (in percent
of GDP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue and grants
|
|
71.3
|
67.0
|
59.4
|
61.2
|
65.4
|
|
Revenue
|
|
37.3
|
41.7
|
34.9
|
33.1
|
34.0
|
|
Tax revenue
|
|
15.9
|
21.7
|
16.5
|
16.7
|
16.9
|
|
of which: corporate income tax
|
2.9
|
9.5
|
4.6
|
4.6
|
4.6
|
|
Non-tax revenue
|
|
20.6
|
20.0
|
18.5
|
16.5
|
17.0
|
|
of which: Fishing license fees
|
|
17.7
|
17.0
|
15.4
|
13.4
|
14.0
|
|
Grants 2/
|
|
33.9
|
25.3
|
24.5
|
28.1
|
31.4
|
|
Expenditure
|
|
66.8
|
59.2
|
57.9
|
60.0
|
65.8
|
|
Expense
|
|
63.6
|
55.5
|
53.4
|
53.3
|
57.2
|
|
Net acquisition of nonfinancial assets
|
3.2
|
3.7
|
4.5
|
6.7
|
8.5
|
|
Gross Public Investment
|
|
9.4
|
9.5
|
10.0
|
12.0
|
13.5
|
|
Net lending/borrowing
|
|
4.5
|
7.8
|
1.6
|
1.3
|
-0.4
|
|
Net lending/borrowing (excl. grants)
|
|
-29.5
|
-17.5
|
-22.9
|
-26.8
|
-31.8
|
|
Public debt (outstanding stock, end of
period)
|
17.0
|
14.6
|
12.4
|
10.6
|
10.6
|
|
Balance of trust funds 3/
|
|
351.5
|
287.7
|
323.2
|
330.9
|
381.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial banks (in percentage of GDP; end
of period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans /4
|
|
13.3
|
12.8
|
11.1
|
11.3
|
11.5
|
|
Deposits
|
|
111.7
|
99.5
|
96.2
|
94.2
|
92.9
|
|
Interest rates (in percent, average for FY)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
14.2
|
13.7
|
14.3
|
…
|
…
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
5.8
|
5.1
|
4.8
|
…
|
…
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of payments (in millions of U.S.
dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade balance
|
|
-161.4
|
-162.4
|
-169.9
|
-181.0
|
-203.5
|
|
Net services and income
|
|
22.2
|
26.5
|
29.3
|
21.9
|
26.4
|
|
Private and official transfers
|
|
147.7
|
172.4
|
155.9
|
162.8
|
180.9
|
|
Current account
|
|
8.5
|
36.6
|
15.3
|
3.7
|
3.8
|
|
(in percent of GDP)
|
|
2.2
|
8.5
|
3.3
|
0.8
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External debt (in millions of U.S. dollars;
end of period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding stock
|
|
62.9
|
59.4
|
54.3
|
49.2
|
51.3
|
|
(in percent of GDP)
|
|
16.1
|
13.8
|
11.8
|
10.2
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memorandum items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real effective exchange rate 5/
|
|
100.9
|
106.9
|
114.8
|
…
|
…
|
|
Nominal GDP (in millions of U.S. dollars)
|
390.0
|
430.2
|
460.5
|
484.0
|
507.1
|
|
Sources: FSM authorities and IMF staff
estimates and calculations.
|
|
|
1/ Fiscal year ends on September 30. Data
for FY2019-22 is estimate from authorities
and subject to revision.
|
|
|
2/ Excludes contributions to the Compact
Trust Fund.
|
|
|
3/ Compact Trust Fund and FSM Trust Fund.
|
|
|
4/ Includes only domestic lending and does
not account for loans to customers outside
the country.
|
|
|
5/ Calendar year. 2010=100. The U.S. dollar
is legal tender and the official currency.
|
|
[1]
Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds
bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff
team visits the country, collects economic and financial
information, and discusses with officials the country's economic
developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff
prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the
Executive Board.
[2]
At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as
Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors,
and this summary is transmitted to the country's authorities. An
explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found
here:
http://www.IMF.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm
.