An Investigation of Output Variance Before and During Inflation Targeting

December 1, 2001

Disclaimer: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF.The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate

Summary

Since Taylor estimated a trade-off between inflation and output variance, it has been widely accepted that efforts to keep the inflation rate “too low and stable” will likely result in relatively larger output fluctuations. Following the generalized reduction in inflation variance in the 1990s, that concern was rekindled. This study estimates whether conditional output variance has changed in a sample of 12 countries. With the possible exception of Canada, there is no evidence of an increase in output variance. Either output variance has not changed (i.e., in Korea and Singapore) or has fallen (i.e., in Australia and New Zealand).

Subject: Business cycles, Economic growth, Inflation, Inflation targeting, Monetary policy, Monetary policy frameworks, Potential output, Prices, Production

Keywords: Australia and New Zealand, Business cycles, Inflation, inflation targeting, inflation targeting framework, inflation variance, inflation-targeting regime, Markov-switching, Monetary policy frameworks, output trade-off, output variance, output variance trade-off, Potential output, WP

Pages:
27
Volume:
2001
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451875041.001
Issue:
215
Series:
Working Paper No. 2001/215
Stock No:
WPIEA2152001
ISBN:
9781451875041
ISSN:
1018-5941

IMF’s Work

RESOURCES

TOPICS

Flagship Publications

Other Publications

IMF reports and publications by country

Regional Offices

All News

See Also

For Journalists

Press Center

RESOURCES

FLAGSHIPS

KEY SERIES

IMF NOTES

Loading component...

IMF Working Papers