Budgetary Transparency for Public Expenditure Control
Electronic Access:
Free Download. Use the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view this PDF file
Summary:
This paper explains why EMU countries seem unable or unwilling to undertake structural reforms of public expenditure. One of the reasons is political. What public expenditure reforms might be pursued without changing the political system? Without political reforms, technical improvements made to increase budget transparency, such as strengthening budget procedure, integrating accrual into cash accounting, and removing accounting gimmicks, could indirectly affect reforms of public expenditure. Removing gimmicks and helping prevent the emergence of new creative accounting techniques may be a partial substitue for political reforms. Implementation of the Growth and Stability Pact should be dynamically consistent with budgetary transparency. Although other EMU countries resorted as well to budgetary gimmicks to bypass difficult fiscal constraints, the Italian case is used as a reference to clarify these issues. Transparency may help discourage the use of gim micks.
Series:
Working Paper No. 2001/008
Subject:
Accrual accounting Budget planning and preparation Expenditure Expenditure rationalization Fiscal accounting and reporting Public debt Public financial management (PFM)
English
Publication Date:
January 1, 2001
ISBN/ISSN:
9781451842517/1018-5941
Stock No:
WPIEA0082001
Pages:
31
Please address any questions about this title to publications@imf.org