Public Information Notice (PIN) No. 11/157
December 13, 2011
On November 28, 2011, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
concluded the first ever Article IV consultation discussions with United Kingdom–Anguilla–British
Overseas Territory.1
Background
Anguilla has experienced a boom-bust cycle related to the global crisis and faces
a persisting hangover. Several large resort projects fueled a FDI boom during 2003–08,
which doubled nominal GDP. The stalling of one of these projects and the global
crisis led to declines in real GDP of 16.5 percent in 2009 and 5.9 percent
in 2010 respectively. The fiscal situation deteriorated sharply as revenue collapsed
while expenditure remained elevated after the increases during the boom years, notwithstanding
a series of fiscal measures.
The downturn has accentuated strains on the financial system. The asset portfolio
of the banking system, which is concentrated in construction, tourism, and personal
loans, was
adversely affected, and the ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans in the indigenous
banks increased to 36 percent by end-June 2011.
The growth outlook is improving with the major tourism projects getting back on
course, though a slow recovery is only expected to begin in 2012. Risks are tilted
to the downside given the global outlook. Nevertheless, balancing the overall budget
by the start of 2013 will be challenging.
Executive Board Assessment
The Executive Directors noted that the severe boom-bust cycle related to the global
crisis has accentuated weaknesses in the financial sector, undermined the fiscal
position, and pushed the island into recession. They concurred that urgent action
is needed to improve the health of the financial sector, to stabilize public finances,
and to increase the potential for long-run economic growth.
Directors agreed that close cooperation will be needed to address financial sector
vulnerabilities, particularly those related to the indigenous banks. They recommended
developing a strategy to strengthen the banks’ capital and clean up their
balance sheets and underscored the need for an action plan which could usefully
spell out the respective roles of the key players.
Directors emphasized that a new fiscal framework is needed with an appropriate balance
between current and capital expenditure and in line with the resources available.
Fiscal policy should be designed to meet the combined objectives of debt sustainability,
deficit reduction, and long-term economic growth. Given financing constraints and
economic vulnerabilities, they urged the government to accumulate buffers during
good times to allow for countercyclical spending during slowdowns. As part of the
new framework, they suggested that the 2012 budget restore capital spending to historical
levels, cut current spending, while ensuring adequate revenue given financing constraints.
Directors welcomed efforts toward reforming the inefficient and inequitable tax
system. They supported a comprehensive tax reform that would simplify the tax structure
and broaden the tax base. They noted that a general consumption-based tax such as
a VAT/GST and a permanent income tax would attain both objectives. The complex system
of customs duties and exemptions should be replaced with a tariff with few rates
and limited exemptions.
Directors noted that the tourism sector, the driver of the economy, has begun to
recover, benefiting from its high-end focus. They were encouraged that prospects
have brightened now that the two major tourism projects are getting back on track.
However, they recognized that air and sea access to the island needs to be improved.
Directors agreed that a fundamental course change is needed to increase the potential
for long-term GDP growth and reduce its volatility. They recommended that the short-run
policy priorities be to increase capital spending, improve the business environment
including through a one-stop shop, and address skills shortages through improved
training and greater labor mobility. In the longer run, the focus should be on improving
access to the island and enhancing diversification, which would reduce the volatility
of real GDP growth rates.
Directors welcomed the Anguillan authorities’ initiative in proposing the
first ever Article IV Consultation Discussions, which had usefully informed
the 2011 Eastern Caribbean Currency Union Common Policies Discussions and hoped
that the close dialog developed would continue.
|
Anguilla. Selected Indicators, 2006?12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Est. |
Proj. |
|
|
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
|
|
|
(Annual percentage change) |
|
National income and prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real GDP
|
15.6 |
17.3 |
-0.3 |
-16.5 |
-5.9 |
-1.8 |
1.5 |
|
GDP deflator
|
3.0 |
10.3 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
-2.2 |
2.5 |
4.2 |
|
Consumer prices, average
|
8.4 |
5.1 |
6.8 |
-0.7 |
1.0 |
2.5 |
4.2 |
|
Consumer prices, end period
|
10.5 |
3.3 |
5.3 |
-0.8 |
0.9 |
5.0 |
3.5 |
|
Monetary sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broad money (M2)
|
11.3 |
13.5 |
-5.6 |
-4.8 |
-0.9 |
-3.9 |
1.6 |
|
(Annual change, in percent of M2 at the beginning of the year) |
|
Net foreign assets
|
1.1 |
-12.6 |
-19.8 |
-10.9 |
14.8 |
-2.1 |
-3.9 |
|
Net domestic credit
|
10.2 |
26.0 |
14.2 |
6.1 |
-15.7 |
-1.8 |
5.5 |
|
Private sector credit
|
14.4 |
28.9 |
16.9 |
3.8 |
0.3 |
-2.8 |
1.9 |
|
Credit to central government
|
-3.2 |
3.4 |
1.1 |
5.1 |
-16.4 |
1.6 |
0.7 |
|
(In percent of GDP) |
|
Public sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary central government balance
|
1.8 |
-0.9 |
-1.3 |
-7.1 |
-0.2 |
3.0 |
-0.7 |
|
Overall central government balance
|
1.0 |
-1.6 |
-2.1 |
-8.2 |
-1.7 |
1.7 |
-2.5 |
|
Revenue and grants
|
25.4 |
22.1 |
23.1 |
18.7 |
23.9 |
26.8 |
24.4 |
|
Of which: Grants
|
1.9 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
4.5 |
0.0 |
1.8 |
|
Expenditure and net lending
|
24.4 |
23.7 |
25.2 |
26.8 |
25.6 |
25.1 |
26.9 |
|
Foreign financing
|
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
1.7 |
0.2 |
17.3 |
-0.3 |
-0.3 |
|
Domestic financing including arrears
|
-3.9 |
3.7 |
1.4 |
10.8 |
-17.4 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
|
Total public debt (end-of-period)
|
13.9 |
13.9 |
15.3 |
24.1 |
24.9 |
27.1 |
28.4 |
|
External
|
3.5 |
3.1 |
4.9 |
6.3 |
23.7 |
22.8 |
23.4 |
|
Domestic
|
10.4 |
10.8 |
10.3 |
17.8 |
1.2 |
4.3 |
5.0 |
|
(Annual percentage change) |
|
External sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exports of goods and nonfactor services
|
-18.3 |
-25.0 |
24.8 |
-13.4 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
|
Imports of goods and nonfactor services
|
72.4 |
10.7 |
9.6 |
-44.6 |
-7.5 |
-1.6 |
8.0 |
|
(In percent of GDP) |
|
External current account balance
|
-52.7 |
-52.0 |
-59.5 |
-30.6 |
-22.9 |
-21.4 |
-19.1 |
|
Trade balance
|
-64.5 |
-58.3 |
-63.7 |
-41.6 |
-40.8 |
-39.8 |
-40.9 |
|
Services, incomes and transfers
|
11.8 |
6.3 |
4.2 |
11.0 |
18.0 |
18.4 |
21.8 |
|
Of which: Travel (net)
|
33.1 |
27.6 |
23.7 |
26.0 |
32.9 |
35.8 |
37.3 |
|
Capital and financial account
|
52.6 |
51.6 |
56.7 |
30.4 |
39.7 |
20.6 |
18.6 |
|
Of which: Foreign direct investment
|
49.6 |
33.1 |
27.6 |
15.7 |
17.0 |
16.2 |
16.9 |
|
Memorandum Item:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP at market prices, current prices (in EC$ million)
|
773.7 |
968.5 |
965.5 |
794.8 |
744.2 |
749.7 |
793.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sources: Authorities; and IMF staff estimates and projections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anguilla. Selected Indicators, 2006?12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Est. |
Proj. |
|
|
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
|
|
|
(Annual percentage change) |
|
National income and prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real GDP
|
15.6 |
17.3 |
-0.3 |
-16.5 |
-5.9 |
-1.8 |
1.5 |
|
GDP deflator
|
3.0 |
10.3 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
-2.2 |
2.5 |
4.2 |
|
Consumer prices, average
|
8.4 |
5.1 |
6.8 |
-0.7 |
1.0 |
2.5 |
4.2 |
|
Consumer prices, end period
|
10.5 |
3.3 |
5.3 |
-0.8 |
0.9 |
5.0 |
3.5 |
|
Monetary sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broad money (M2)
|
11.3 |
13.5 |
-5.6 |
-4.8 |
-0.9 |
-3.9 |
1.6 |
|
(Annual change, in percent of M2 at the beginning of the year) |
|
Net foreign assets
|
1.1 |
-12.6 |
-19.8 |
-10.9 |
14.8 |
-2.1 |
-3.9 |
|
Net domestic credit
|
10.2 |
26.0 |
14.2 |
6.1 |
-15.7 |
-1.8 |
5.5 |
|
Private sector credit
|
14.4 |
28.9 |
16.9 |
3.8 |
0.3 |
-2.8 |
1.9 |
|
Credit to central government
|
-3.2 |
3.4 |
1.1 |
5.1 |
-16.4 |
1.6 |
0.7 |
|
(In percent of GDP) |
|
Public sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary central government balance
|
1.8 |
-0.9 |
-1.3 |
-7.1 |
-0.2 |
3.0 |
-0.7 |
|
Overall central government balance
|
1.0 |
-1.6 |
-2.1 |
-8.2 |
-1.7 |
1.7 |
-2.5 |
|
Revenue and grants
|
25.4 |
22.1 |
23.1 |
18.7 |
23.9 |
26.8 |
24.4 |
|
Of which: Grants
|
1.9 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
4.5 |
0.0 |
1.8 |
|
Expenditure and net lending
|
24.4 |
23.7 |
25.2 |
26.8 |
25.6 |
25.1 |
26.9 |
|
Foreign financing
|
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
1.7 |
0.2 |
17.3 |
-0.3 |
-0.3 |
|
Domestic financing including arrears
|
-3.9 |
3.7 |
1.4 |
10.8 |
-17.4 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
|
Total public debt (end-of-period)
|
13.9 |
13.9 |
15.3 |
24.1 |
24.9 |
27.1 |
28.4 |
|
External
|
3.5 |
3.1 |
4.9 |
6.3 |
23.7 |
22.8 |
23.4 |
|
Domestic
|
10.4 |
10.8 |
10.3 |
17.8 |
1.2 |
4.3 |
5.0 |
|
(Annual percentage change) |
|
External sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exports of goods and nonfactor services
|
-18.3 |
-25.0 |
24.8 |
-13.4 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
|
Imports of goods and nonfactor services
|
72.4 |
10.7 |
9.6 |
-44.6 |
-7.5 |
-1.6 |
8.0 |
|
(In percent of GDP) |
|
External current account balance
|
-52.7 |
-52.0 |
-59.5 |
-30.6 |
-22.9 |
-21.4 |
-19.1 |
|
Trade balance
|
-64.5 |
-58.3 |
-63.7 |
-41.6 |
-40.8 |
-39.8 |
-40.9 |
|
Services, incomes and transfers
|
11.8 |
6.3 |
4.2 |
11.0 |
18.0 |
18.4 |
21.8 |
|
Of which: Travel (net)
|
33.1 |
27.6 |
23.7 |
26.0 |
32.9 |
35.8 |
37.3 |
|
Capital and financial account
|
52.6 |
51.6 |
56.7 |
30.4 |
39.7 |
20.6 |
18.6 |
|
Of which: Foreign direct investment
|
49.6 |
33.1 |
27.6 |
15.7 |
17.0 |
16.2 |
16.9 |
|
Memorandum Item:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP at market prices, current prices (in EC$ million)
|
773.7 |
968.5 |
965.5 |
794.8 |
744.2 |
749.7 |
793.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sources: Authorities; and IMF staff estimates and projections.
|
|
|
|
|
1 Under Article IV
of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members,
usually every year. A staff team visits the country or territory, collects economic
and financial information, and discusses with officials the country's economic developments
and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms
the basis for discussion by the Executive Board. At the conclusion of the discussion,
the Managing Director, as Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive
Directors, and this summary is transmitted to the country's authorities. An explanation
of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found here:
http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm.
|