| Public Information Notices (PINs) are issued, (i) at the request of a member country, following the conclusion of the Article IV consultation for countries seeking to make known the views of the IMF to the public. This action is intended to strengthen IMF surveillance over the economic policies of member countries by increasing the transparency of the IMF's assessment of these policies; and (ii) following policy discussions in the Executive Board at the decision of the Board. |
The IMF Executive Board on February 11, 1998 concluded the 1997 Article IV consultation1 with Brazil.
Background
In 1997 Brazil continued to reduce its inflation rate to under 5 percent, reflecting a
moderation in labor costs and import prices, as well as a good harvest. Real GDP grew
by an estimated 3.0 percent, compared with 2.9 percent in 1996. Growth was led by domestic
demand, especially investment. The trade deficit widened, albeit at a declining rate as the year
progressed, reflecting a sharp increase in imports. Manufactured exports recovered significantly,
however, in the second half of the year. The rise in the trade deficit, together with a deterioration
in net service payments, contributed to an increase of the external current
account deficit to US$33.4 billion in 1997 (4.2 percent of GDP) from US$24
billion in 1996 (3.2 percent of GDP). More than half of the current account deficit was financed
by foreign direct investment, which increased strongly in 1997, partly as a
result of the privatization program. In 1997 as a whole, international reserves declined
by about US$8 billion (all of which occurred during the financial market turmoil in late October)
to a level of about US$52 billion, equivalent to 8.2 months of imports of goods and nonfactor
services. Reserves have subsequently recovered to about US$58 billion by end-February 1998.
Preliminary financing data indicate that the overall fiscal position, as measured by
the public sector borrowing requirement, which remained at 5.9 percent of GDP, was essentially
unchanged in 1997. The primary deficit, however, increased from 0.1 percent of GDP in 1996 to
0.7 percent of GDP in 1997. This result reflects mainly the outturn for the social security and
increased spending by the states (partly to eliminate arrears or contingent liabilities) financed by
large privatization receipts. Monetary policy remained cautious. In April 1997, the
central bank departed from the policy of gradually reducing interest rates in line with the decline
in inflation, leaving its basic intervention rate unchanged at 20.7 percent until the end of October.
The authorities allowed the real to depreciate within the exchange rate band by about 0.6
percent a month against the U.S. dollar, more than the inflation differential between the two
countries.
In late October 1997, Brazil’s currency came under pressure following the turmoil in
financial markets in Asia. The authorities reacted swiftly by doubling the central bank
intervention interest rate on October 30, 1997 to 43 percent, and on November 10, 1997
announced the adoption of a comprehensive fiscal package equivalent to about 2½ percent
of GDP. These actions were instrumental in improving market expectations, and promoting a
reflow of capital and the substantial recovery of international reserves to date in 1998. The
reestablishment of calm in financial markets has allowed a sizable reduction (over 15 percentage
points at an annual rate) of interest rates in the last couple of months.
Executive Board Assessment
Directors commended the authorities for their quick and decisive policy response to the
strong pressures on the real in late October, noting that those actions—the doubling of
interest rates and the quick passage of a strong fiscal package—had played an important role
in limiting the contagion effects from the Asian turmoil in Brazil and the rest of Latin America.
Directors stressed that the steady implementation of the fiscal adjustment measures, the early
passage of the pending structural fiscal reforms, and prudent monetary policy would be essential
to ensure a sustained reduction of the current account deficit, minimize Brazil’s
vulnerability to the continuing volatility in international financial markets, and realize its full
economic potential.
Directors noted that Brazil’s economy had continued to perform well in 1997, with
per capita real GDP showing significant growth for the fifth consecutive year, and consumer
price inflation falling to under 5 percent. They also noted the progress made in strengthening the
financial system and in accelerating the privatization program. However, they noted that the
external accounts had continued to deteriorate, albeit at a decelerating pace as the year had
progressed.
While Directors were encouraged by the recovery of manufactured exports, strong growth of
direct investment in 1997, and by the prospect of a further decline in the current account deficit
in 1998, they noted that those projected improvements in the external accounts were predicated
on a stable international environment and sustained export growth and, therefore, developments
would need to be carefully monitored. In view of Brazil’s high level of external debt and
debt service in relation to exports, Directors stressed the importance of securingfurther reductions
of the current account deficit in subsequent years, through a sustained improvement in
competitiveness and further growth and diversification of exports.
Directors generally supported the authorities’ policy of seeking a gradual depreciation
of the real exchange rate within the current band system, taking into account productivity
developments. Most Directors felt that, in the present unsettled market conditions, any significant
modification of exchange rate policies could be misinterpreted and could lead to a loss of
confidence.
Noting the recent reduction of maturities of new public debt and the increase in the share of
domestic public debt with a foreign exchange guarantee, Directors urged the authorities to step
up their efforts to revert soon to the earlier trends toward lengthening the average maturities of
debt and reducing the share of foreign exchange indexed debt.
Directors noted that the implementation of the authorities’ fiscal policy package as
envisaged, together with the use of most of the privatization receipts for debt reduction, would
facilitate a decline in the overall public sector deficit and debt and, therefore, a further sustained
reduction in interest rates during the course of the year. Directors stressed the importance of
fiscal consolidation as a means of continuing to raise domestic savings. They also emphasized
the importance of resisting spending pressures that might arise during a year of general elections,
and welcomed the authorities’ readiness to adopt additional measures if needed.
Directors commended the progress made in setting the finances of the states on a more
sustainable path, in particular through the restructuring of their debt at substantially reduced
interest rates. To ensure long-term sustainability, it was essential that debt restructuring be
accompanied by the negotiation and firm implementation of strong fiscal adjustment programs by
the states, and by the use of a large share of their privatization proceeds to reduce debt. Directors
stressed the importance of speedily concluding the negotiations of such programs, and
emphasized that expenditure restraint will be key to the states’ fiscal adjustment in 1998.
Moreover, the federal government will need to monitor closely and enforce firmly the
implementation of those programs, and ensure that the states fully service their rescheduled debt.
Directors welcomed the authorities’ success in privatizing public enterprises, both at
the federal and state levels. They noted that the privatization process would allow for much
needed investments by the private sector, which, along with efficiency gains, would establish a
better foundation for future economic growth.
Directors welcomed the authorities’ recent progress in obtaining Congressional
approval of the proposed constitutional reforms concerning the social security and public
administration system, and the prospect of final approval of that legislation in the near future.
Some Directors noted, however, that it would be desirable to move forward as soon as possible
with a further, more comprehensive reform of the social security system. Directors welcomed the
steps taken in the context of the fiscal package to eliminate some important regional fiscal
incentives and to streamline direct taxation, as well as the authorities’ intention to put
forward soon proposals for a comprehensive fiscal reform and their efforts to improve efficiency
in health andeducation spending. Directors believed that the efforts being undertaken to increase
flexibility in the labor market were a key element of the modernization strategy. They also took
note of the recent improvements in key social indicators, and encouraged the authorities to
continue to strive for a reduction of poverty and income inequality.
Directors supported the authorities’ intention further to reduce interest rates at a pace
that will prove consistent with the maintenance of stable conditions in financial and foreign
exchange markets. They also noted that, as a result of the substantial progress made in the past
couple of years in strengthening their balance sheets, the banks were in a better position than in
1995 to withstand the adverse effects of high real interest rates and a slowdown of economic
activity on the quality of their portfolios. Nevertheless, Directors cautioned that the authorities
would need to continue their close monitoring of the large banks and their ongoing program of
thorough inspections of second-tier banks.
Directors also welcomed the authorities’ ongoing efforts to strengthen bank
supervision, with the support of the World Bank, and the measures taken recently to tighten
capital adequacy standards, and urged the authorities further to strengthen efforts to improve their
information on the consolidated foreign currency exposure of financial institutions and of
enterprises.
Directors welcomed the significant progress that had been made in restructuring state banks,
with two large banks privatized in 1997, and two other major banks scheduled for privatization
in 1998. With respect to the other smaller state-owned banks with problems, Directors urged the
authorities to continue their efforts to privatize or, if necessary, close them. As far as the federal
banks were concerned, Directors noted that their capital appeared adequate at the present time,
and stressed the importance of allowing them to conduct their operations on a strictly commercial
basis. Directors also felt that, over the medium term, it would be desirable to further reduce the
public sector’s involvement in banking activities.
Directors encouraged the authorities to further liberalize trade, which would provide impetus
to the modernization and development of the economy. Directors noted that import tariffs in
Brazil remained high, and the dispersion of rates gave rise to high rates of effective protection in
some sectors. Several Directors called for a reduction in the protection provided to the
automobile sector. They also stated that the recently agreed increase in the common external
tariff of Mercosur ran counter to the trade liberalization trend, and urged the authorities and their
Mercosur partners to work toward an early reversal of this increase.
Directors urged the authorities to eliminate Brazil’s remaining exchange restrictions
and move quickly to accept the obligations under Article VIII, Sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Articles
of Agreement.
Directors commended the authorities for their efforts to provide comprehensive economic
data regularly and on a timely basis to the staff. They encouraged the authorities to take steps to
further improve the comprehensiveness of financial sector and external debt statistics. With a
view to improving the transparency of Brazil’s economy to foreign financial markets,
Directors agreed that it would be desirable that the authorities take the necessary steps to enable
Brazil to subscribe to the Special Data Dissemination Standard.
| Brazil: Selected Economic Indicators |
|
| |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
19971 |
|
| |
(In percent) |
| Domestic economy |
|
| Change in Real GDP |
6.0 |
4.2 |
2.9 |
3.0 |
| Unemployment
rate |
5.1 |
4.6 |
5.4 |
5.7 |
| Change in
consumer prices (end of period) |
929.3 |
22.0 |
9.1 |
4.3 |
| Change in
consumer prices (year average) |
2,149.0 |
67.3 |
16.5 |
6.0 |
| |
| |
(In billions of U.S. dollars)2 |
| External economy |
|
| Exports,
f.o.b |
44 |
47 |
48 |
53 |
| Imports,
f.o.b. |
33 |
50 |
53 |
61 |
| Current
account balance |
-2 |
-18 |
-25 |
-33 |
| Direct
investment |
2 |
4 |
10 |
17 |
| Portfolio
investment |
7 |
2 |
6 |
5 |
| Capital
account balance |
15 |
32 |
34 |
26 |
| Gross official
reserves |
39 |
52 |
60 |
52 |
| Current
account balance (in percent of GDP) |
-0.3 |
-2.5 |
-3.2 |
-4.2 |
| |
| |
(In percent of GDP)2 |
| Financial variables |
|
| Public sector
borrowing requirement |
45.5 |
7.2 |
5.9 |
5.9 |
| Change in
broad money (in percent) |
1,148.5 |
33.5 |
7.8 |
25.5 |
| Monthly
nominal interest rate (in percent) |
25.2 |
3.6 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
Source: Brazilian authorities and staff estimates.
1Estimates. 2Unless otherwise
noted. |
1Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the
IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff team visits the country,
collects economic and financial information, and discusses with officials the country's economic
developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the
basis for discussion by the Executive Board. At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing
Director, as Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of directors, and this summary is
transmitted to the country's authorities. In this PIN, the main features of the Board's discussion
are described.
|