IMF Survey : New Products, More Value Can Advance Economic Take-Off
IMF News, March 4, 2013
Source details
- Canonical URL
- IMF Survey : New Products, More Value Can Advance Economic Take-Off
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Published: March 4, 2013
Overview
- Conference: “Diversification and Structural Transformation for Growth and Stability in Low-Income Countries,” jointly organized by the IMF and the UK’s Department for International Development, held on February 21.
- Publication: IMF Survey by Nikola Spatafora, IMF Institute for Capacity Development, March 4, 2013.
- Central message: To reach the next level of development, low-income countries should transform their economic structures by diversifying into new sectors and producing new, higher value-added products.
Diversification and structural transformation
- Sustainable development requires:
- Diversifying into new sectors.
- Upgrading the quality of existing products.
- Reallocating resources toward more productive firms.
- Key questions raised:
- What are the obstacles to diversification and product quality improvement?
- Do low- and middle-income countries face different challenges?
- What new opportunities and risks does globalization present?
- What is the appropriate role for government policy?
Capabilities approach to development (Ricardo Hausmann)
- Development and diversification viewed in terms of “capabilities” — the key inputs needed to produce goods (for instance, specific skills or public goods).
- Advanced economies have more capabilities and can produce a wider range of more complex products.
- Capabilities develop incrementally by moving into new products similar to the existing product base.
- Radical capability changes require coordination of many economic actors and are likely to fail.
- Indicators of both the range of existing capabilities and the ease of acquiring new ones are strong predictors of growth at the country level.
- Institutions, human capital, and financial development matter because they facilitate accumulation of capabilities, not as substitutes for capabilities.
Diverse country experiences and measurement issues (William Maloney)
- The implications for growth of producing any given good are hard to measure because of varied country experiences.
- Natural resources have sometimes been associated with fast growth, and sometimes with stagnation.
- A given product will be produced by a wide range of countries at different income levels and sell for a wide range of prices.
- Policy implication: Focus on resolving market failures related to innovation, risk-taking, and other barriers to the emergence of new goods and improvement of existing ones.
Product quality and growth (Christian Henn; Fidel Perez-Sebastian)
- New, extensive dataset confirms significant cross-country differences in product quality.
- Overall, quality in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia is lower, and has been growing more slowly, than in East Asia.
- Scope for quality upgrading is greatest in manufactures, but is also present in agriculture.
- Better institutions and greater skills help increase the pace of quality upgrading, leading to faster growth in GDP per capita.
Impact of globalization (Kei-Mu Yi; Romain Wacziarg)
- Rising trade openness leads to a reallocation of labor by sector and speeds up structural change.
- Debate: China’s emergence may complicate other economies’ attempts to expand manufacturing.
- Pattern from new data on the European Union, the United States, China, and India:
- Early stages of development: countries diversify into an expanded range of activities; new sectors localize in specific geographic regions and regional production structures diverge.
- Later stages of development: countries tend to specialize in a few sectors; specialized activities are increasingly carried out in all regions, and different regions become increasingly similar.
Low agricultural productivity and underlying distortions
- The world’s poorest countries are particularly unproductive in agriculture, though agriculture employs most of their labor force.
- Measurement adjustments (hours worked, human capital per worker, household income and expenditure surveys) reduce but do not eliminate low relative agricultural productivity.
- Policy-induced distortions contribute to low agricultural productivity:
- Example: farms are on average 34 times smaller in poor countries.
- Causes cited include land reforms that impose a ceiling on farm size and progressive land taxes.
- Since labor productivity is much lower in small farms, these policies significantly impact agricultural and aggregate productivity.
Policy recommendations and implications
- Observed pattern: In many low-income countries—particularly in sub-Saharan Africa—growth over the past 15 years has been relatively rapid, but manufacturing has expanded slowly, agricultural productivity remains low, and service sectors are largely informal.
- Consensus on policy approach:
- Sector-specific policies can deliver rapid growth for a period.
- Broader “horizontal” policies, cutting across sectors, are required to sustain growth over time.
- Broad recommendations for low-income countries:
- Public inputs—including infrastructure—are critical, as is continuous consultation between governments and businesses.
- Healthy economies constantly reinvent themselves; policies should aim at increasing productivity more broadly rather than emphasizing any particular product.
- Create an environment where firms can improve their capabilities and technology; structural reforms and improvements in the business climate are crucial.
IMF Survey : New Products, More Value Can Advance Economic Take-Off — Nikola Spatafora, IMF Institute for Capacity Development, March 4, 2013.
Content in this bundle
- Chennpdf (PDF)
- Fidelppdf (PDF)
- Gollinpdf (PDF)
- Malo2pdf (PDF)
- Muyi2pdf (PDF)
- Restucciapdf (PDF)
- Rhspdf (PDF)
- Romawpdf (PDF)
- Rrog2pdf (PDF)
- Sdn1213pdf (PDF)