February 15, 2017
PRESS OFFICER: Ting Yan
Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org
On January 30, 2017, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation [1] with the Lao People's Democratic Republic.
Real GDP growth is expected to moderate from 7.5 percent in 2015 to 7 percent in 2016. Domestic activity has slowed following a less favorable external environment, and credit growth has also moderated from a high level. Inflation is expected to remain low and stable at around 2 percent at end-2016, aided by a strengthening kip exchange rate. The current account deficit is expected to remain high at 17 percent of GDP in 2016 but has narrowed from 20 percent of GDP in 2014. Gross international reserves, at 2 months of prospective imports of goods and services (US$998.6 million, September 2016) remain low by partner country standards. While the overall banking system is well capitalized, state-owned bank balance sheets show signs of weakness, with rising nonperforming loans (NPLs) and weak capital and profitability. The fiscal deficit is expected to have widened to 6 percent in fiscal year 2016 owing to weak tax revenue growth and rising current spending. Public-and-publicly-guaranteed debt (excluding arrears) is projected at 68 percent of GDP in nominal terms (56 percent of GDP in present value terms) at end-2016, a level which elevates the risk of debt distress from medium to high.
As growth continues to moderate in the near-term, inflation is projected to remain in low single digits. The current account deficit is projected to widen to around 19 percent of GDP in 2017 due to the execution of large infrastructure projects with foreign direct investment, and reserves are expected to remain at around 2 months of imports. On current trends without the resumption of fiscal consolidation, the fiscal deficit is expected to remain at around 5 percent and the public debt could rise to around 70 percent of GDP. Risks are on the downside. A failure to consolidate the fiscal position and bring down public debt could undermine confidence in the government’s macro policy framework, raise public debt further and worsen the external position. The economy is also exposed to external shocks, notably a further regional growth slowdown and a deterioration in terms-of-trade and capital inflows. Financial risks could also present risk to macroeconomic stability, particularly the growing foreign currency debt financed by foreign borrowing, and the existence of balance sheet currency mismatches in the private non-bank sector.
Executive Board Assessment [2]
Executive Directors commended the authorities for their strong macroeconomic performance and progress on poverty reduction despite economic challenges. Directors noted, however, that there are significant vulnerabilities in the external, fiscal, and financial sectors, and that risks to the outlook could materialize from a regional growth slowdown, tightening in global monetary conditions, and capital flow volatility. Against this background, Directors emphasized the need for resuming fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary conditions with gradually increased exchange rate flexibility over the medium-term, strengthened financial sector supervision, and reforms to support economic diversification and private sector development.
Directors considered that growth-friendly fiscal consolidation anchored on reducing public debt to 55 percent of GDP over the course of the next 5 years would reduce the risk of debt distress and help strengthen the external position. They welcomed efforts to contain the public sector wage bill, improve tax administration, and reduce non-concessional financing. To ensure successful consolidation and space for well-targeted social and capital spending, Directors recommended increased measures to mobilize tax revenues, reduce exemptions, and rationalize current expenditures. Efforts to formulate a medium-term fiscal framework, enhance fiscal transparency, and reduce fiscal arrears were also encouraged.
Directors noted that the exchange rate remains overvalued and international reserves are low for precautionary purposes, particularly in the context of a large current account deficit, although they also noted that in the past the current account has largely been financed by foreign direct investment. They recommended the authorities continue allowing the exchange rate to move gradually within the official band, supported by tightening of kip liquidity, to help accumulate gross international reserves and reduce external vulnerabilities. Directors agreed that a cautious approach was warranted, given currency mismatches in the non-bank private sector, and the use of the exchange rate as an anchor for inflation. Further reform of the monetary and financial framework would help facilitate more flexibility in the future.
Directors noted the rise in nonperforming loans (NPLs) and undercapitalization of state-owned banks. To safeguard macro-financial stability, they recommended promptly addressing NPLs, phasing out regulatory forbearance, strengthening sound lending practices and supervision, and recapitalizing state-owned banks. Directors emphasized the importance of addressing supervisory weaknesses and developing a crisis management framework. They welcomed the AML/CFT law, and encouraged full implementation of the action plan as agreed with the Financial Action Task Force.
Directors welcomed progress on product and labor market openness and gains in poverty reduction. To support more inclusive and broad-based growth, they encouraged further reforms aimed at diversifying the economy, boosting private sector activity, and improving the business climate. In this context, trade integration and improvements in education and health infrastructure were encouraged. Enhancing financial deepening and financial access by small and medium-sized enterprises would also support macro stability and growth.
Directors welcomed the authorities’ interest in improving the quality and publication of economic and financial data, with technical assistance from the Fund and other development partners as needed.
|
Lao P.D.R.: Selected Economic and Financial Indicators, 2011–18 1/ |
|||||||||
|
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
||
|
Proj. |
Proj. |
Proj. |
|||||||
|
GDP and prices (percentage change) |
|||||||||
|
Real GDP growth |
8.0 |
7.9 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
7.5 |
6.9 |
6.8 |
6.7 |
|
|
CPI (annual average) |
7.6 |
4.3 |
6.4 |
4.1 |
1.3 |
2.2 |
2.3 |
2.7 |
|
|
CPI (end year) |
7.7 |
4.7 |
6.6 |
2.4 |
0.9 |
2.1 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
|
|
Revenue and Grants |
22.4 |
24.1 |
23.9 |
23.2 |
24.0 |
18.5 |
19.4 |
19.7 |
|
|
Of which : Resources |
3.4 |
3.7 |
3.2 |
3.0 |
2.2 |
2.1 |
2.1 |
1.9 |
|
|
Of which : Mining |
2.7 |
3.0 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
|
|
Of which : Hydro power |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
|
|
Of which : Grant |
6.0 |
6.4 |
5.7 |
5.3 |
5.0 |
2.3 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
|
|
Expenditure |
24.1 |
24.6 |
29.6 |
27.8 |
26.7 |
24.4 |
24.6 |
24.9 |
|
|
Expense |
11.3 |
12.0 |
17.3 |
15.2 |
15.7 |
16.4 |
15.9 |
16.2 |
|
|
Net acquisition of nonfinancial assets 2/ |
12.9 |
12.6 |
12.3 |
12.6 |
11.0 |
8.0 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
|
|
Overall balance |
-1.7 |
-0.5 |
-5.6 |
-4.5 |
-2.7 |
-5.9 |
-5.2 |
-5.2 |
|
|
Nonmining balance 3/ |
-4.5 |
-3.5 |
-7.8 |
-6.5 |
-4.0 |
-6.8 |
-6.1 |
-5.8 |
|
|
Public and public guaranteed debt (in percent of GDP) |
56.0 |
56.8 |
62.5 |
64.9 |
65.8 |
67.8 |
69.0 |
70.3 |
|
|
Money and credit (annual percent change) |
|||||||||
|
Reserve money |
16.2 |
27.2 |
7.7 |
30.3 |
6.6 |
9.8 |
11.0 |
… |
|
|
Broad money |
28.7 |
31.0 |
18.8 |
23.4 |
14.7 |
13.0 |
16.0 |
… |
|
|
Bank credit to the economy 4/ |
45.8 |
26.6 |
34.5 |
14.2 |
16.8 |
17.2 |
15.0 |
… |
|
|
Bank credit to the private sector |
39.3 |
35.1 |
36.3 |
11.7 |
19.3 |
17.6 |
18.0 |
… |
|
|
Balance of payments |
|||||||||
|
Exports (in millions of U.S. dollars) |
3,120 |
3,323 |
3,883 |
4,687 |
4,387 |
4,804 |
5,124 |
5,596 |
|
|
In percent change |
42.1 |
6.5 |
16.9 |
20.7 |
-6.4 |
9.5 |
6.7 |
9.2 |
|
|
Imports (in millions of U.S. dollars) |
4,642 |
6,382 |
7,352 |
8,017 |
7,533 |
7,684 |
8,708 |
9,565 |
|
|
In percent change |
28.1 |
37.5 |
15.2 |
9.1 |
-6.0 |
2.0 |
13.3 |
9.8 |
|
|
Current account balance (in millions of U.S. dollars) |
-1,502 |
-2,808 |
-3,195 |
-2,450 |
-2,116 |
-2,351 |
-2,813 |
-3,181 |
|
|
In percent of GDP |
-18.6 |
-29.9 |
-29.6 |
-20.7 |
-16.8 |
-17.1 |
-19.0 |
-19.7 |
|
|
Gross official reserves (in millions of U.S. dollars) |
677 |
740 |
662 |
816 |
987 |
1,476 |
1,587 |
1,622 |
|
|
In months of prospective goods and services imports |
1.2 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
1.2 |
1.5 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
1.8 |
|
|
External public debt and debt service |
|||||||||
|
External PPG debt |
|||||||||
|
In millions of U.S. dollars |
3,666 |
4,262 |
5,489 |
6,061 |
6,495 |
7,422 |
8,240 |
8,987 |
|
|
In percent of GDP |
45.5 |
45.3 |
50.9 |
51.1 |
51.7 |
54.1 |
55.6 |
55.7 |
|
|
External PPG debt service |
|||||||||
|
In percent of exports |
2.7 |
4.2 |
5.1 |
5.6 |
5.2 |
7.1 |
7.7 |
9.1 |
|
|
Exchange rate |
|||||||||
|
Official exchange rate (kip per U.S. dollar; end-of-period) |
8,019 |
7,982 |
8,030 |
8,096 |
8,119 |
… |
… |
… |
|
|
Real effective exchange rate (2005=100) |
135.0 |
136.3 |
144.9 |
153.5 |
166.6 |
… |
… |
… |
|
|
Nominal GDP |
|||||||||
|
In billions of kip |
64,727 |
75,251 |
84,572 |
95,406 |
102,543 |
112,188 |
122,518 |
134,219 |
|
|
In millions of U.S. dollars |
8,062 |
9,400 |
10,788 |
11,851 |
12,561 |
13,722 |
14,831 |
16,135 |
|
|
Sources: Data provided by the Lao P.D.R. authorities; and IMF staff estimates and projections. |
|||||||||
|
1/ Public finances are on a fiscal year (October to September) while other data are on a calendar year. |
|||||||||
|
2/ Includes off-budget investment expenditures. |
|||||||||
|
3/ Net lending/borrowing excluding mining revenue. |
|||||||||
|
4/ Includes Bank of Lao P.D.R. lending to state-owned enterprises and subnational levels of government. |
|||||||||
[1] Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff team visits the country, collects economic and financial information, and discusses with officials the country's economic developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the Executive Board.
[2] At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors, and this summary is transmitted to the country's authorities. An explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found here: http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm .
