A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: Revisited
IMF Working Papers, May 1, 1992
Source details
- Canonical URL
- A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: Revisited
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Robert P Flood, Joshua Aizenman
- Published: May 1, 1992
- Series: IMF Working Papers
Overview
- Title: A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: Revisited
- Authors: Robert P Flood, Joshua Aizenman
- Date: May 1, 1992
- Core objective: Return to the simplicity of early Friedman and Mundell arguments and formalize them to assist currency area decisions where little is known about economic structure.
- Scope: Formalization intended to be useful for nations lacking detailed data on economic structure.
Key findings and contributions
- Reframes the high-level academic debate on cross-country monetary arrangements (originating with Friedman and Mundell) into a simpler, formalized approach.
- Emphasizes applicability to currency area decisions when data requirements of complex models are impractical for the countries concerned.
- Focuses on reducing data-intensity while preserving the analytical logic of early optimum currency area arguments.
Analytical focus and terminology
- Subjects listed: Conventional peg, Employment, Exchange rate arrangements, Exchange rate flexibility, Foreign exchange, Labor.
- Keywords and technical terms preserved from the paper:
- Conventional peg
- costs of factor mobility
- Employment
- Exchange rate arrangements
- Exchange rate flexibility
- Global
- home economy producer
- labor market
- labor reallocation cost
- labor-mobility cost
- marginal product of labor
- mobility cost c
- price level
- reallocation cost
- time cost
- WP
Policy relevance and implications
- Provides a more tractable framework for evaluating currency area membership/design where comprehensive structural data are unavailable.
- Intended to inform decisions about exchange rate arrangements (including conventional pegs and exchange rate flexibility) with special attention to labor mobility and reallocation costs.
- Useful for policymakers weighing costs and benefits of monetary integration under limited informational environments.