Growth in East Asia: What We Can and What We Cannot Infer From it


Michael Sarel

Publication Date:

September 1, 1995

Disclaimer: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF.The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate


This paper examines the different arguments raised by the studies that addressed the East Asian growth experience. The original arguments presented in this paper are all on the negative side, highlighting problems associated with some of the possible explanations for the East Asian miracle. The paper concentrates mainly on four dimensions of the debate about the East Asian growth experience: (i) The nature of economic growth intensive or extensive?; (ii) The role of public policy and of selective interventions; (iii) The role of high investment rates and a strong export orientation as possible engines of growth; and (iv) The importance of the initial conditions and their relevance for policy.


Working Paper No. 1995/098



Paper was presented at the Conference on Growth and Productivity, organized by the Reserve Bank of Australia in Sydney, in July 1995.


Publication Date:

September 1, 1995



Stock No:




Please address any questions about this title to