IMF Working Papers

The Persistence of Corruption and Regulatory Compliance Failures: Theory and Evidence

ByPer G. Fredriksson, Muthukumara Mani, Richard Damania

September 1, 2003

Preview Citation

Format: Chicago

Per G. Fredriksson, Muthukumara Mani, and Richard Damania. "The Persistence of Corruption and Regulatory Compliance Failures: Theory and Evidence", IMF Working Papers 2003, 172 (2003), accessed 12/22/2025, https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451858594.001

Export Citation

  • ProCite
  • RefWorks
  • Reference Manager
  • BibTex
  • Zotero
  • EndNote
Disclaimer: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF.The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate

Summary

This paper examines the reasons why corruption and policy distortions tend to exhibit a high degree of persistence in certain regimes. We identify circumstances under which a firm seeks to evade regulations by (1) bribing of local inspectors, and (2) lobbying high-level government politicians to resist legal reforms designed to improve judicial efficiency and eliminate corruption. The analysis predicts that in politically unstable regimes, the institutions necessary to monitor and enforce compliance are weak. In such countries, corruption is more pervasive and the compliance with regulations is low. The empirical results support the predictions of the model.

Subject: Corruption, Crime, Education, Environment, Legal support in revenue administration, Revenue administration, Tax evasion

Keywords: bureaucracy, corruption, enforcement regime, government politician, incumbent government, investment decision, judicial system, Legal support in revenue administration, lobbying, political instability, regime instability, rule of law, Tax evasion, WP