Are Emerging Asia’s Reserves Really Too High?
IMF Working Papers, August 1, 2008
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Are Emerging Asia’s Reserves Really Too High?
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Marta Ruiz-Arranz, Milan Zavadjil
- Published: August 1, 2008
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451870503.001
Key findings
- Empirical analysis does not suggest that reserves are "too high" in the majority of Asian countries, though China may be a special case.
- Much of the reserve increase in Asia can be explained by an optimal insurance model under which reserves provide a steady source of liquidity to cushion the impact of a sudden stop in capital inflows on output and consumption.
- The benefits of reserves in terms of reduced spreads on privately held external debt further explains the observed growth in reserves since 1997-98.
- Using threshold estimation techniques, the paper shows that most of Asia can still benefit from higher reserves in terms of reduced borrowing costs.
Analytical approach and concepts
- Optimal insurance model: Reserves serve as a steady liquidity source to cushion sudden stops in capital inflows and their impact on output and consumption.
- Spread reduction channel: Reserves reduce spreads on privately held external debt, contributing to reserve accumulation dynamics since 1997-98.
- Threshold estimation techniques: Used to identify reserve levels at which additional reserves begin to yield diminishing returns in borrowing-cost reductions.
Policy-relevant implications
- For most Asian countries, current reserve levels are consistent with precautionary needs implied by optimal insurance considerations.
- China may require separate consideration given its potentially distinct reserve dynamics.
- Additional reserves can still be beneficial for most Asian economies by lowering borrowing costs through reduced spreads on external private debt.
Content in this bundle
- Box 1: Why Scale Reserves by Gross External Liabilities?