From Bear Stearns to Anglo Irish: How Eurozone Sovereign Spreads Related to Financial Sector Vulnerability
IMF Working Papers, May 1, 2009
Source details
- Canonical URL
- From Bear Stearns to Anglo Irish: How Eurozone Sovereign Spreads Related to Financial Sector Vulnerability
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Ashoka Mody
- Published: May 1, 2009
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451872552.001
Key findings and narrative
- Following the onset of the subprime crisis in July 2007, sovereign spreads across the eurozone rose, but the rise was mainly on account of common global factors.
- The rescue of Bear Stearns in March 2008 marked a turning point: countries thereafter became increasingly differentiated in their sovereign spreads.
- Sovereign spreads of a eurozone country tended to rise when the prospects of its domestic financial sector worsened.
- The evidence suggests the rescue of Bear Stearns created a link between financial sector vulnerabilities and a larger contingent liability on public finances.
- After the failure of Lehman Brothers, spreads also rose faster for countries with higher ratios of public debt-to-GDP.
- The transitional dynamics appear to have concluded with the nationalization of Anglo Irish: sovereign spreads throughout the eurozone jumped, with that jump emphasizing differentiation by financial sector vulnerability and public debt levels.
- The results imply that, to varying degrees, countries may have moved to a new regime characterized by:
- weak economic outlook,
- financial sector fragilities,
- and strains on public finances.
Analysis and interpretation
- Timeline of structural shifts:
- July 2007: Subprime crisis onset — common global factors dominate spread increases.
- March 2008: Bear Stearns rescue — emergence of cross-country differentiation linked to domestic financial sector prospects.
- Post-Lehman Brothers failure: Faster spread increases in countries with higher public debt-to-GDP ratios.
- Nationalization of Anglo Irish: System-wide jump in spreads reinforcing the role of financial-sector vulnerability and public debt in differentiating sovereign risk.
- Mechanism proposed:
- Rescue operations and high-profile failures altered market perceptions of contingent fiscal liabilities arising from financial sector distress, thereby connecting bank fragility to sovereign risk premia.
Policy-relevant implications
- Monitoring and mitigating financial sector vulnerabilities is crucial for sovereign risk management because financial distress can translate into contingent fiscal liabilities that widen sovereign spreads.
- Public debt positions matter more under stress: higher public debt-to-GDP ratios can amplify sovereign spread responses after major financial shocks.
- The sequence of events highlights the importance of crisis prevention and resolution frameworks that limit the degree to which financial-sector interventions create or signal large contingent liabilities for sovereigns.