Labor Market Dynamics, Informality and Regulations in Latin America
IMF Working Papers, January 31, 2020
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Labor Market Dynamics, Informality and Regulations in Latin America
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Antonio David, Samuel Pienknagura, Jorge Roldos
- Published: January 31, 2020
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513523750.001
Summary
- Labor markets in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) are characterized by high levels of informality and relatively rigid regulation.
- The paper shows that informality and rigid regulation are related and together slow the speed of adjustment of employment to shocks, especially when regulations are tightly enforced.
- Evidence suggests that strict labor market regulations have an adverse effect on medium-term growth.
- Regulations on prices (minimum wages) and quantities (employment protection) both decrease the speed of adjustment to shocks but bind in different phases of the cycle:
- Minimum wages affect mostly the (net) job creation margin.
- Employment protection affects mostly the (net) job destruction margin.
- Results highlight possible interactions between labor market regulations and the effectiveness of macro-stabilization tools—including exchange rate depreciation.
Key Findings
- High informality and relatively rigid labor market regulation are correlated features in LAC.
- Combined presence of informality and strict enforcement slows employment adjustment to shocks.
- Strict labor market regulations negatively affect medium-term growth.
- Distinct regulatory instruments bind in different parts of the employment cycle:
- Price regulation (minimum wages) → net job creation margin.
- Quantity regulation (employment protection) → net job destruction margin.
- Interactions exist between labor market regulations and macro-stabilization effectiveness (explicitly noted: exchange rate depreciation).
Policy Implications and Considerations
- Reforms addressing both informality and regulatory rigidity could improve the speed of employment adjustment to shocks.
- Differentiated policy responses may be needed because:
- Adjusting minimum wage policies primarily influences job creation margins.
- Modifying employment protection primarily influences job destruction margins.
- Consideration of how labor market regulations interact with macro-stabilization tools (for example, exchange rate policy) is important when designing policy mixes.
Content in this bundle
- Working Paper