Washington, DC:
On January 27, 2021, the Executive Board of the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation
[1]
with Nigeria.
Nigeria’s economy has been hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic. Following a
sharp drop in oil prices and capital outflows, real GDP is estimated to
have contracted by 3.2 percent in 2020 amidst the pandemic-related
lockdown. Headline inflation rose to 14.9 percent in November 2020, a
33-month high, reflecting core and food inflation increases emanating from
supply shortages due to the lockdown effected to curb infections alongside,
the land-border closure and continued import restrictions. The unemployment
rate reached 27 percent in the second quarter of 2020, with youth
unemployment at 41 percent.
The Nigerian authorities acted swiftly to adopt a pandemic-related support
package equivalent to 0.3 percent of GDP in the 2020 revised federal budget
despite limited fiscal space. External vulnerabilities due to lower oil
prices and weak global demand have increased, with the current account
remaining in deficit in the first half of 2021. In April 2020, Nigeria
received IMF emergency financial assistance of $3.5 billion under the Rapid
Financing Instrument to help cushion the impact of the pandemic.
Socio-economic conditions have deteriorated, with rising food inflation,
elevated youth unemployment, mass protests in October 2020, and surveys
show worsening food insecurity with a significant impact on the vulnerable.
Risks are tilted to the downside and include the resurgence of the
pandemic, security situation and unfavorable external environment. Capital
outflow risks arise from the record-low domestic interest rates and large
foreign holdings of domestic securities. On the upside, recovering oil
prices and completion of the Dangote oil refinery could catalyze more
domestic crude oil production and boost growth.
Executive Board Assessment
[2]
Executive Directors agreed with the thrust of the staff appraisal. They
commended the authorities for the measures taken to address the health and
economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic which have exacerbated
pre-existing weaknesses. Looking ahead, Directors emphasized the need for
urgent policy adjustment and more fundamental reforms to sustain
macroeconomic stability and lift growth and employment.
Directors welcomed notable reforms undertaken in the fiscal sector,
including removal of the fuel subsidy and steps to implement
cost-reflective tariff increases in the power sector. However, they
stressed the need for significant revenue mobilization to reduce fiscal
sustainability risks, relying initially on progressive and
efficiency-enhancing measures with higher tax rates awaiting a more
sustained economic recovery. They highlighted the need for improved social
safety nets to cushion potential negative impacts on the poor.
Directors noted that multiple rates, limited flexibility, and foreign
exchange shortages are posing challenges. They recommended a gradual and
multi-step approach to establishing a unified and clear exchange rate
regime with the near-term focus on allowing for greater flexibility and
removing the payments backlog.
Directors observed that the accommodative monetary stance remains
appropriate in the near term, although tightening may be warranted if
balance of payments or inflationary pressures were to increase. In the
medium term, the monetary policy operational framework should be reformed
and Central Bank financing of budget deficit phased out in order to reduce
inflation.
While welcoming the resilience of the banking sector, Directors called for
continued vigilance to contain financial stability risks. They noted that
COVID-19 debt relief measures for bank clients should remain time-bound and
limited to those with good pre-crisis fundamentals.
Directors welcomed recent progress in structural reforms and called for
continued reforms aimed at promoting economic diversification and reducing
the dependence on oil and increasing employment. In addition, they
encouraged strengthening governance and anticorruption frameworks,
including compliance with AML/CFT measures. Directors also welcomed the
ratification of the African Continental Free Trade Area and underscored
that implementing trade-enabling reforms remains critical to rejuvenate
growth.
|
Nigeria: Selected Economic and Financial
Indicators, 2017–21
|
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020
|
2021
|
|
1/20/2021 16:19
|
|
Projections
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National income and prices
|
(Annual percentage change, unless
otherwise specified)
|
|
Real GDP (at 2010 market prices)
|
0.8
|
1.9
|
2.2
|
|
-3.2
|
1.5
|
|
Oil and Gas GDP
|
4.7
|
1.0
|
4.6
|
|
-10.5
|
3.0
|
|
Non-oil GDP
|
0.5
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
|
-2.5
|
1.4
|
|
Non-oil non-agriculture GDP
|
-0.6
|
2.0
|
1.8
|
|
-4.0
|
1.2
|
|
Production of crude oil (million
barrels per day)
|
1.89
|
1.93
|
2.00
|
|
1.80
|
1.84
|
|
Nominal GDP at market prices (trillions
of naira)
|
114.9
|
129.1
|
145.6
|
|
157.7
|
183.4
|
|
Nominal GDP per capita (US$)
|
1,969
|
2,033
|
2,230
|
|
…
|
…
|
|
GDP deflator
|
11.1
|
10.2
|
10.4
|
|
11.8
|
14.6
|
|
Non-oil GDP deflator
|
7.1
|
8.5
|
13.0
|
|
15.0
|
14.4
|
|
Consumer price index (annual average)
|
16.5
|
12.1
|
11.4
|
|
13.2
|
14.8
|
|
Consumer price index (end of period)
|
15.4
|
11.4
|
12.0
|
|
15.2
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and savings
|
(Percent of GDP)
|
|
Gross national savings
|
18.2
|
20.8
|
22.4
|
|
21.8
|
21.8
|
|
Public
|
-0.5
|
0.7
|
0.4
|
|
-1.3
|
-0.2
|
|
Private
|
18.8
|
20.1
|
22.0
|
|
23.1
|
22.0
|
|
Investment
|
14.7
|
19.0
|
25.4
|
|
24.6
|
23.5
|
|
Public
|
3.3
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
|
2.4
|
2.7
|
|
Private
|
11.5
|
16.0
|
22.4
|
|
22.2
|
20.7
|
|
Current account balance
|
2.8
|
1.0
|
-3.8
|
|
-3.7
|
-2.2
|
|
|
-3.8
|
-2.3
|
-2.6
|
|
-3.7
|
-3.0
|
|
Consolidated government operations
|
(Percent of GDP)
|
|
Total revenues and grants
|
6.6
|
8.5
|
7.9
|
|
5.9
|
6.9
|
|
Of which:
oil and gas revenue
|
2.6
|
4.6
|
3.7
|
|
1.9
|
2.2
|
|
Total expenditure and net lending
|
12.0
|
12.8
|
12.6
|
|
11.8
|
11.7
|
|
Overall balance
|
-5.4
|
-4.3
|
-4.8
|
|
-5.9
|
-4.7
|
|
Non-oil primary balance
|
-6.7
|
-7.2
|
-6.8
|
|
-5.9
|
-5.6
|
|
Non-oil revenue
|
4.0
|
4.0
|
4.2
|
|
3.9
|
4.5
|
|
Public gross debt1
|
25.3
|
27.7
|
29.1
|
|
34.4
|
34.3
|
|
Of which
: FGN debt
|
22.4
|
25.0
|
26.5
|
|
31.0
|
30.7
|
|
Of which:
External debt
|
5.0
|
6.4
|
6.2
|
|
8.4
|
7.7
|
|
FGN interest payments (percent of FGN
revenue)
|
58.4
|
60.7
|
52.6
|
|
92.6
|
60.8
|
|
Interest payments (percent of
consolidated revenue)
|
20.5
|
19.9
|
20.5
|
|
35.2
|
23.0
|
|
Money and credit
|
(Change in percent of broad money at
the beginning of the period, unless
otherwise specified)
|
|
Broad money (percent change; end of
period)
|
-1.2
|
15.0
|
6.4
|
|
9.7
|
17.3
|
|
Net foreign assets
|
10.8
|
3.0
|
-18.0
|
|
2.1
|
-7.9
|
|
Net domestic assets
|
-12.0
|
12.0
|
24.5
|
|
7.7
|
25.2
|
|
o/w Claims on consolidated government
|
-1.0
|
5.1
|
16.2
|
|
7.4
|
15.6
|
|
Credit to the private sector (y-o-y,%)
|
-1.8
|
-11.9
|
23.5
|
|
15.6
|
19.3
|
|
Velocity of broad money (ratio; end of
period)
|
3.8
|
3.5
|
3.8
|
|
3.9
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External sector
|
(Annual percentage change, unless
otherwise specified)
|
|
Exports of goods and services
|
32.3
|
29.9
|
5.9
|
|
-32.4
|
17.3
|
|
Imports of goods and services
|
8.4
|
40.6
|
40.7
|
|
-24.0
|
4.2
|
|
Terms of trade
|
9.4
|
12.4
|
-5.1
|
|
-18.2
|
6.5
|
|
Price of Nigerian oil (US dollar per
barrel)
|
54.4
|
71.1
|
64.0
|
|
42.8
|
48.0
|
|
External debt outstanding (US$
billions) 2
|
94.8
|
99.2
|
112.4
|
|
105.5
|
107.6
|
|
Gross international reserves (US$
billions)
|
39.5
|
42.8
|
38.1
|
|
29.5
|
21.8
|
|
(equivalent months of imports of
G&Ss)
|
6.6
|
5.1
|
6.0
|
|
4.4
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources: Nigerian authorities; and IMF
staff estimates and projections.
|
|
1
Gross debt figures for the Federal
Government and the public sector
include overdrafts from the Central
Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and AMCON bonds.
|
|
2
Includes both public and private
sector.
|
|
[1]
Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds
bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff
team visits the country, collects economic and financial
information, and discusses with officials the country's economic
developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff
prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the
Executive Board.
[2]
At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as
Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors,
and this summary is transmitted to the country's authorities. An
explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found
here:
http://www.IMF.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm
.