Washington, DC: The Executive Board of the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation
[1]
with Mauritius.
While the pandemic has hit the Mauritian economy hard, the authorities have
been successful in containing the virus and mitigating the economic impact
of the crisis. With tourism halted, real GDP contracted by 15 percent in
2020, and the current account deficit widened substantially. However,
unemployment—while high—was contained by wage support schemes. In the face
of falling revenue and urgent social spending needs, the fiscal deficit has
widened notably. Inflation is low, while the banking and global business
sectors appear to be sound. From the outset of the pandemic, the rapid
closure of the border, imposition of a lockdown, and other public health
measures have kept viral transmission to a low level. Vaccinations began in
February 2021, and the authorities target vaccinating 60 percent of the
population by end-September 2021.
The economy will begin to recover in 2021, with growth forecast at about 5
percent. Tourism flows are expected to slowly resume in the second half of
the year, and exports will strengthen in line with global demand.
Unemployment will likely remain elevated as wage support schemes are scaled
back but then return to trend in the following years. Inflation is
projected to increase modestly by end-2021, propelled by recuperating
aggregate demand. Medium-term growth is projected to converge to
pre-pandemic rates of 3-3½ percent. Mauritius’ economic outlook is subject
to downside risks as the country emerges from the pandemic. Tourism flows
are uncertain, and a prolonged pandemic could require costly containment
efforts and prompt behavioral changes hurting tourism.
Executive Board Assessment
[2]
Executive Directors agreed with the thrust of the staff appraisal.
Directors congratulated Mauritius for its success in containing the
COVID-19 pandemic. They noted that the pandemic has severely impacted
Mauritius’ economy, resulting in substantially widened fiscal and current
account deficits. Directors cautioned that challenges and risks remain,
particularly the unclear pace of recovery in tourism, complicating the
authorities’ decisions on when to scale back emergency measures. They
encouraged the authorities to take advantage of the recovery to institute
broad-based structural reforms toward a more resilient, green, and
inclusive economy, while addressing debt sustainability concerns and
strengthening the monetary policy framework.
Directors agreed that the fiscal stance should remain accommodative in the
near term. However, given the rising debt level, the authorities should
prepare for credible medium-term consolidation and rebuilding fiscal
buffers, including through an appropriate fiscal rule. Once the country has
exited the crisis, revenue will need to be increased and spending reduced
to put debt on a declining path, while avoiding undue social costs.
Directors stressed that a successful adjustment requires addressing the
growing divergence between pension spending and revenue, particularly given
the unfavorable demographic situation.
Directors concurred that monetary policy should remain accommodative in the
near term, while preparing for the normalization of monetary and exchange
rate policies. In this context, they encouraged enhancing the central
bank’s credibility, as well as improving monetary policy transmission and
effectiveness.
Directors stressed that the central bank should refrain from providing
direct financing to the government and engaging in quasi-fiscal
activities, and advised reforming the Bank of Mauritius law, including
to preempt further exceptional transfers to the government.
Directors also recommended that the central bank be recapitalized and
relinquish ownership of the Mauritius Investment Corporation (MIC), with
the financing of the MIC provided through the budgetary process.
Directors noted that, while subject to elevated uncertainty, Mauritius’
external position at end-2020 was substantially weaker than is consistent
with medium-term fundamentals and desirable policies, while official
foreign reserves coverage remained within the adequacy range. They stressed
that the foreign exchange intervention strategy should be revised to
support exchange rate flexibility, while smoothing extreme exchange rate
volatility and ensuring market liquidity.
Directors urged the Mauritian authorities to sustain reforms to support its
structural transformation to a strong, resilient, and inclusive growth
path. They supported the authorities’ commitment to exit the FATF and EU
AML/CFT lists, enhance diversification, strengthen competitiveness, improve
public sector procurement practices, and mitigate vulnerabilities to
climate change.
|
Mauritius: Selected Economic and Financial Indicators,
2019-2022
|
|
|
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|
National income, prices and
employment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real GDP (percentage change)
|
|
3.0
|
-14.9
|
5.0
|
6.7
|
|
Consumer prices (period average,
percentage change)
|
|
0.5
|
2.5
|
2.3
|
3.7
|
|
Unemployment rate (percent)
|
|
6.7
|
9.2
|
9.2
|
9.2
|
|
Money and credit (percentage
change)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foreign assets
|
|
13.5
|
16.4
|
-8.7
|
-0.4
|
|
Broad money
|
|
6.2
|
17.7
|
-1.5
|
2.5
|
|
Central government finances 1 (percent of GDP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall borrowing requirement 2
|
|
-13.1
|
-20.0
|
-8.4
|
-5.6
|
|
Revenues, including grants
|
|
22.7
|
21.8
|
23.2
|
23.9
|
|
Expenditure, excluding net lending
|
|
34.5
|
38.4
|
31.3
|
29.4
|
|
External sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current account balance (percent of
GDP)
|
|
-5.4
|
-12.6
|
-15.6
|
-6.8
|
|
Gross international reserves (millions
of U.S. dollars)
|
|
7,329
|
7,242
|
6,192
|
5,942
|
|
Memorandum items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP at current market prices (billions
of Mauritian rupees)
|
|
498.3
|
429.4
|
453.6
|
498.5
|
|
Public sector debt, fiscal year
(percent of GDP)
|
|
84.6
|
92.0
|
92.6
|
91.4
|
|
Sources: Country authorities; and IMF
staff estimates and projections.
1
GFSM 2001
concept of net lending/net borrowing,
includes special and other
extrabudgetary funds. Fiscal data
reported for fiscal years (e.g.,
2018=2018/19).
2
Following the GFSM 2014,
Sections 5.111-5.116, the transfers
from the BOM to the Central Government
are considered as financing.
|
|
|
[1]
Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds
bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff
team visits the country, collects economic and financial
information, and discusses with officials the country's economic
developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff
prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the
Executive Board.
[2]
At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as
Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors,
and this summary is transmitted to the country's authorities. An
explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found
here:
http://www.IMF.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm.