Welcome! Thank you for joining us for this important and topical dialogue
on Climate-Related Financial Risks and Green Finance.
The science is clear
: only decisive action to contain climate change will prevent disastrous
outcomes for people and economies. We must cut global emissions by 25-50 percent by 2030 to limit
average global warming between 1.5 and 2 degrees Celsius.
The Asia-Pacific region understands the urgency. Here, temperatures are
rising twice as fast as the global average, risking more
frequent and severe weather-related disasters.
[i]
And the region produces about half of the global emissions
and is home to five of the world’s largest greenhouse-gas emitters.
What should we do?
We must
redirect resources to low-carbon and energy-efficient activities
. It requires a comprehensive policy package, including adequate carbon
pricing, proper disclosure of climate risks, offsetting measures to protect
vulnerable populations, and green investment.
We estimate the world needs energy-related investments at about $3.3 trillion per year until 2030 to achieve net-zero by
2050.
[ii]
While this figure is large, it dwarfs in comparison with the broader
benefits—just from phasing out coal they run into tens of trillions of dollars per year, as we show in a
paper released today.
[iii]
All this underlines the importance of putting a price on carbon—or
equivalent measures—to incentivize the transition and reap these benefits.
Investing in adaptation is equally important. We estimate
public adaptation costs of around one-quarter percent of
global GDP per year in the next decades. But for some climate-vulnerable
countries, the figure could be as much as 20 percent of
GDP.
[iv]
While efforts at climate financing are increasing, it falls far short of
what is needed. We must find urgent ways to attract more climate funding,
especially for emerging and developing economies.
The role of markets and the private sector is critical
to mobilizing and efficiently allocating resources, while putting a price
on climate risks.
Many issuers—including emerging market economies—have started embracing
funding via environmentally sustainable finance, and the
financial sector is playing an important enabling role.
Of course, there are significant challenges, such as
physical and transition risks. They must be managed well by central banks,
regulators, and financial firms, including by strengthening and harmonizing
regulation, data, disclosures, and taxonomies.
But the biggest risk for us—and for the world of
finance—is to miss the net-zero path.
The risk of market failure in climate finance underscores the important
role for national authorities and international institutions
to provide and catalyze needed financing. This will have to be built as a strong partnership with the private sector and financial
markets.
The Fund
is stepping up its work and playing a central role in the fight against climate change
. We support our members through policy
advice, identifying financial stability risks, capacity development, and
addressing data gaps.
On the lending side, our new Resilience and Sustainability Trust, already $40 billion
strong, will help countries address structural challenges like climate
change.
We are engaging with our partners, such as the Network for Greening the Financial System. Their chair,
Ravi Menon, is here today—thank you for your important work!
Einstein once said that “we cannot solve our problems with the same
thinking we used when we created them.”
This is the aim of this forum — to put forward fresh thinking and exchange
on new ideas to address climate risks and grasp green opportunities. I wish
you all the success in your work.
Thank you.
[ii]
IMF estimates based on IEA data.
[iii]
Adrian, T., P. Bolton, A.M. Kleinnijenhuis (2022) “The Great Carbon
Arbitrage.” IMF Working Paper, June 1.
[iv]
IMF Staff Climate Note (2022) Macro-fiscal Implication of
Adaptation to Climate Change.
APD Departmental Paper (2021) Unlocking Access to Climate Finance
for Pacific Island Countries.