IMF Staff Country Reports

Botswana: Financial Sector Assessment Program-Technical Note on Systemic Liquidity Management

March 5, 2024

Preview Citation

Format: Chicago

International Monetary Fund. Monetary and Capital Markets Department "Botswana: Financial Sector Assessment Program-Technical Note on Systemic Liquidity Management", IMF Staff Country Reports 2024, 060 (2024), accessed 12/6/2025, https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400267604.002

Export Citation

  • ProCite
  • RefWorks
  • Reference Manager
  • BibTex
  • Zotero
  • EndNote

Summary

This paper presents a technical note on Systemic Liquidity Management in Botswana. The liquidity management framework of the Bank of Botswana (BoB) has been strengthened since the April 2022 monetary policy reforms; however, structural excess liquidity and its volatility persist. The BoB’s liquidity regulations could more effectively facilitate banks’ ability to manage liquidity internally. Although banks maintain liquid assets above the regulatory minimum, these may be insufficient to withstand a high funding liquidity risk. Further support for an effective framework for banks’ liquidity management can emanate from streamlining the BoB’s collateral framework for refinancing facilities. The absence of a framework for emergency liquidity assistance leaves a gap for managing systemic liquidity shocks and should be addressed as a priority. Promoting the development of interbank repo market and government securities market helps to increase financial sector resilience. The existing interbank market is a fragmented unsecured market comprised of one-way lending from large banks to small banks, which is an important but insufficient shock absorber for liquidity risk.

Subject: Asset and liability management, Collateral, Commercial banks, Financial institutions, Financial regulation and supervision, International organization, Liquidity, Liquidity requirements, Liquidity risk, Monetary policy

Keywords: B. emergency liquidity, B. liquidity management framework, Collateral, Commercial banks, Liquidity, Liquidity requirements, liquidity risk, Liquidity risk, liquidity vulnerability, risk control measure