What Undermines Aid’s Impact on Growth?
June 1, 2005
Disclaimer: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF.The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate
Summary
We examine one of the most important and intriguing puzzles in economics: why it is so hard to find a robust effect of aid on the long-term growth of poor countries, even those with good policies. We look for a possible offset to the beneficial effects of aid, using a methodology that exploits both cross-country and within-country variation. We find that aid inflows have systematic adverse effects on a country's competitiveness, as reflected in a decline in the share of labor intensive and tradable industries in the manufacturing sector. We find evidence suggesting that these effects stem from the real exchange rate overvaluation caused by aid inflows. By contrast, private-to-private flows like remittances do not seem to create these adverse effects. We offer an explanation why and conclude with a discussion of the policy implications of these findings.
Subject: Competition, Exchange rates, Labor, Labor share, Real exchange rates
Keywords: aid inflow, country j, country treatment effect, recipient country, WP
Pages:
54
Volume:
2005
DOI:
Issue:
126
Series:
Working Paper No. 2005/126
Stock No:
WPIEA2005126
ISBN:
9781451861457
ISSN:
1018-5941




