IMF Working Papers

GDP Nowcasting Performance of Traditional Econometric Models vs Machine-Learning Algorithms: Simulation and Case Studies

ByKlakow Akepanidtaworn, Korkrid Akepanidtaworn

December 5, 2025

Preview Citation

Format: Chicago

Klakow Akepanidtaworn, and Korkrid Akepanidtaworn. "GDP Nowcasting Performance of Traditional Econometric Models vs Machine-Learning Algorithms: Simulation and Case Studies", IMF Working Papers 2025, 252 (2025), accessed 12/6/2025, https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229033626.001

Export Citation

  • ProCite
  • RefWorks
  • Reference Manager
  • BibTex
  • Zotero
  • EndNote

Disclaimer: IMF Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to encourage debate. The views expressed in IMF Working Papers are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management.

Summary

Are Machine Learning (ML) algorithms superior to traditional econometric models for GDP nowcasting in a time series setting? Based on our evaluation of all models from both classes ever used in nowcasting across simulation and six country cases, traditional econometric models tend to outperform ML algorithms. Among the ML algorithms, linear ML algorithm – Lasso and Elastic Net – perform best in nowcasting, even surpassing traditional econometric models in cases of long GDP data and rich high-frequency indicators. Among the traditional econometric models, the Bridge and Dynamic Factor deliver the strongest empirical results, while Three-Pass Regression Filter performs well in our simulation. Due to the relatively short length of GDP series, complex and non-linear ML algorithms are prone to overfitting, which compromises their out-of-sample performance.

Keywords: Forecast evaluation, Machine Learning, Nowcasting, Real-time data