The Case for (and Against) Asset Management Companies in Banking Crises
Technical Notes and Manuals, July 9, 2024
Source details
- Canonical URL
- The Case for (and Against) Asset Management Companies in Banking Crises
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Miguel A Otero Fernandez, Jaime Ponce, Marc C Dobler, Tomoaki Hayashi
- Published: July 9, 2024
- Series: Technical Notes and Manuals
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400275517.005
Summary
- Explores advantages and disadvantages of establishing state-sponsored centralized asset management companies (AMCs) to address high levels of bank asset distress during financial crises.
- AMCs may mitigate downward price spirals and achieve efficiency gains by consolidating creditor claims and scarce expertise.
- Significant risks and costs include extreme uncertainties in asset valuation and substantial operational and financial risks.
- Past international experiences show risks of underestimating costs, turning AMCs into mechanisms for deferring losses to taxpayers and increasing long-term public costs and moral hazard.
- Emphasizes trade-offs and discusses crucial design elements for effective AMCs: a clear mandate, transfer pricing that prudently reflects asset values and disposal costs, strong governance with independent management, and efficient operational processes promoting transparency and accountability.
Key findings
- Potential benefits of AMCs:
- Mitigating downward price spirals.
- Achieving efficiency gains by consolidating creditor claims and scarce expertise.
- Principal risks and costs:
- Extreme uncertainties in asset valuation.
- Substantial operational and financial risks.
- Possibility of deferring losses to taxpayers and increasing moral hazard if risks are underestimated.
- Historical evidence highlights dangers of shortchanging risk assessment and governance in AMC design.
Design elements for effective AMCs (policy recommendations and operational guidance)
- Clear mandate:
- Define objectives and boundaries of AMC operations explicitly.
- Transfer pricing:
- Ensure transfer pricing prudently reflects asset values and disposal costs.
- Governance:
- Establish strong governance with independent management to limit political interference and moral hazard.
- Operational processes:
- Implement efficient operational processes that promote transparency and accountability.
Subject coverage and keywords
- Subjects listed: Asset and liability management; Asset management companies; Asset valuation; Distressed assets; Expenditure; Financial institutions; Financial sector policy and analysis; Loans; Nonperforming loans; Revenue administration.
- Keywords include: AMC debt; AMC need; asset characteristic; Asset management companies; Asset Management Company (AMC); asset price spiral; Asset valuation; bank asset distress; Bank resolution; Bank restructuring.; centralized asset management companies; Distressed assets; Financial Crisis; Financial regulation and supervision; give borrower; Global; Loans; Non-performing Loans; Nonperforming loans; Problem Asset Resolution; recovery value; resolution strategy.
Content in this bundle
- The Case for