State Institutions and Tax Capacity: An Empirical Investigation of Causality
IMF Working Papers, August 16, 2019
Source details
- Canonical URL
- State Institutions and Tax Capacity: An Empirical Investigation of Causality
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Olusegun Ayodele Akanbi
- Published: August 16, 2019
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513509860.001
Research question and dataset
- Central question: Would better state institutions increase tax collection, or would higher tax collection help improve state institutions?
- Sample: panel dataset covering 110 non-resource-rich countries from 1996 to 2017.
- Methodology: panel vector error correction model; impulse response analyses also employed.
Key empirical findings
- The paper finds that tax capacity and state institutions cause and reinforce each other for a wide range of country groups (bi-directional causality).
- Developing tax capacity and building state institutions need to go hand in hand for best results, particularly in developing countries.
- Impulse response results:
- In advanced economies, the causal effects are generally low in both directions.
- In developing countries, both tax capacity and institutions shocks have larger positive impacts on institutions and tax capacity, respectively.
Policy implications
- Coordinate efforts to strengthen tax capacity and improve state institutions simultaneously, with particular emphasis on developing countries where interventions have larger positive effects.
- Prioritize integrated reforms rather than isolated measures focused only on institutions or only on tax collection systems.
Content in this bundle
- Working Paper