COVID-19 and Inequality in Asia: Breaking the Vicious Cycle
IMF Working Papers, October 16, 2020
Source details
- Canonical URL
- COVID-19 and Inequality in Asia: Breaking the Vicious Cycle
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Emilia M Jurzyk, Medha Madhu Nair, Nathalie Pouokam, Tahsin Saadi Sedik, Irina Yakadina
- Published: October 16, 2020
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513559179.001
Overview
- Authors: Emilia M Jurzyk, Medha Madhu Nair, Nathalie Pouokam, Tahsin Saadi Sedik, Irina Yakadina
- Publication date: October 16, 2020
- Type: IMF Working Paper (Working Paper No. 2020/217)
- Core message: The COVID-19 pandemic risks exacerbating inequality in Asia; without policies that break historical patterns, income inequality—already high and rising—is likely to rise further over the medium term.
Key findings
- The pandemic is having particularly adverse effects on:
- younger workers
- women
- people that are more vulnerable
- Empirical and historical evidence: Pandemics have been shown to increase inequalities.
- Pre-pandemic context: Income inequality in Asia was already high and rising before the pandemic.
- Fiscal responses: Many Asian governments have implemented significant fiscal policy measures to mitigate the pandemic’s effect on the most vulnerable.
- Effectiveness of fiscal measures depends on:
- initial coverage of safety nets
- fiscal space
- degree of informality
- degree of digitalization
Model-based analysis
- The paper includes model-based analysis (Susceptible-Infected-Recovered Macro Model referenced in keywords).
- Key model conclusion:
- Policies targeted to where needs are greatest are effective in mitigating adverse distributional consequences and in underpinning overall economic activity and virus containment.
Policy implications and recommendations
- Target fiscal policies to populations and sectors with the greatest need to:
- mitigate adverse distributional consequences
- support overall economic activity
- assist virus containment efforts
- Design of policy responses should account for:
- existing safety net coverage
- available fiscal space
- informality in labor markets
- level of digitalization for delivery and targeting
Subject areas and keywords
- Subject: Consumption, COVID-19, Education, Health, Income, Income inequality, Labor, National accounts
- Keywords: Asia and Pacific, Consumption, coronavirus disease pandemic, COVID-19, Fiscal Policy, Fiscal Policy., Global, government-imposed lockdown, IMF staff calculation, Income inequality, Inequality, pandemic course, pandemic recession, Susceptible-Infected-Recovered Macro Model, WP
Content in this bundle
- Working Paper