Washington, DC: On December 20, 2021 , the IMF’s Executive Board approved 18-month extensions
(through end-June 2023) of the temporary increases to the cumulative access
limits under its emergency financing instruments, i.e., the Rapid Financing
Instrument (RFI) regular window, the Rapid Credit Facility (RCF) Exogenous
Shock window, and the RFI’s and RCF’s Large Natural Disaster (LND) windows
and allowed all other access limits that had been temporarily increased to
return to their pre-pandemic levels from January 1, 2022 as scheduled.
[1]
This decision reflects the expected and ongoing gradual shift to
upper-credit-tranche (UCT) quality arrangements from emergency financing
triggered by urgent, pandemic-related balance of payment (BoP) needs. At
the same time, the decision ensures continued access by member countries to
the Fund’s emergency financing, should urgent BoP needs arise when a
UCT-quality arrangement is either not necessary or not feasible.
The temporary increases in access limits
for the RFI regular window and the RCF Exogenous Shock window were first
introduced in April 2020 and extended in September 2020, and again in March
2021. For the RFI’s and RCF’s LND windows, the temporary increases were
introduced in June 2021.
The Executive Board reinstated the limit on the number of disbursements
under the RCF within a 12-month period and endorsed staff’s proposal to
prepare an exit strategy from the temporary increase in cumulative access
limits under emergency financing instruments by end-June 2023.
Executive Board Assessment
[2]
Executive Directors noted that the temporarily-high access limits ensured
that the Fund was able to swiftly provide adequate support to its members
during the pandemic. They stressed that access limits are a key element of
the Fund’s risk management framework, providing safeguards to Fund
resources and preserving the revolving nature and catalytic role of Fund
financing. Returning annual access limits to lower levels while extending
the cumulative access limits for emergency financing balances the need to
preserve member countries’ borrowing space with safeguarding Fund
resources.
Directors agreed with the proposal to extend the temporarily-higher
cumulative access limits under the Fund’s emergency financing instruments
for 18 months, while allowing all other temporarily-increased access limits
to expire and return on January 1, 2022 to pre-pandemic levels, except for
the PRGT normal annual access limit, which will become 145 percent of quota
as approved in July 2021. They also noted that the PRGT normal cumulative
access limit was increased on a non-transitory basis to 435 percent of
quota in July 2021. A few Directors thought that the extension of the
cumulative limits under the emergency financing instruments could have been
shorter.
Directors agreed that the respective cumulative access limits for the
regular window of the Rapid Financing Instrument (RFI) and the exogenous
shocks window of the Rapid Credit Facility (RCF) will remain at 150 percent
of quota through end-June 2023. They also agreed that cumulative access
limits for the RFI’s and RCF’s Large Natural Disaster (LND) windows will
remain at 183.33 percent of quota through end-June 2023. Directors noted
that the further temporary extension of the higher cumulative access limits
for emergency financing instruments would have a limited impact on GRA and
PRGT resources.
Directors also agreed to reinstate from January 1, 2022 the
temporarily-suspended two-disbursement limit under the RCF within a
12-month period. They took note that no member requested RCF disbursements
in excess of such limit despite its relaxation during the pandemic period.
Directors noted that the extensions of the temporarily-higher cumulative
access limits would leave adequate borrowing room to support urgent balance
of payments needs under the emergency financing instruments for most Fund
members when upper credit tranche (UCT)-quality programs are either not
feasible or not necessary. Some Directors urged careful
monitoring to ensure that affected countries are not unduly constrained
by the return to lower annual access limits
. Many Directors emphasized the need for a rigorous and transparent
application of the qualification requirements for emergency financing,
including a convincing justification in case a UCT-quality program is
assessed to be not feasible, and some highlighted the importance of strong
governance and robust safeguards for the use of emergency financing.
Directors underscored that members should be encouraged to transition to
tailored, UCT-quality programs when appropriate and feasible to support
structural reforms to address underlying vulnerabilities and larger
financing needs. In this context, Directors welcomed the fact that members
have been increasingly seeking financial assistance under Fund arrangements
that meet UCT-quality standards rather than through emergency financing
instruments.
Directors generally welcomed the staff proposal to prepare an exit strategy
by end-June 2023 and asked for early Board engagement. Some Directors
emphasized that the 18-month extension should be the last, and a few called
on staff to prepare an exit strategy much earlier than proposed. A few
other Directors recommended having greater flexibility.
[1]
For the PRGT, the annual/cumulative normal access limits approved
in July 2021 of 145/435 percent of quota, respectively, will apply.
[2]
At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as
Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors,
and this summary is transmitted to the country authorities. An
explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found
here:
http://www.IMF.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm
.