In the past half century, Malaysia has transformed itself from a producer of commodities such as tin, rubber, and palm oil to a diversified upper-middle-income economy spanning services, manufacturing, and trade. The IMF projects the $516 billion economy will grow 4.7 percent this year, boosted by an influx of investment in artificial intelligence, data centers, and semiconductors.
Amir Hamzah Azizan, 59, was appointed finance minister II in December 2023 following a career across industries including oil, shipping, and electricity. Most recently, he was chief executive officer of the Employees Provident Fund, which manages $315 billion in retirement savings for private sector workers.
In an interview with F&D’s Gita Bhatt and Jeff Kearns, the minister discusses how Southeast Asia’s fifth-largest economy is navigating global geopolitical turbulence and how it can benefit from the boom in AI investment.
F&D: How do you see Malaysia’s economy performing over the next five years, and where is the greatest growth opportunity?
AHA: Our Thirteenth Plan indicates that annual growth will average 4.5 to 5.5 percent between 2026 and 2030, effectively repeating what we’ve achieved over the past three years or so.
Resilience has been a key feature of the economy. We’ve identified key drivers for the economy and put enough policy focus behind them so that when investment comes to the country, it aligns with our national plans.
Our electrical and electronics sector and our semiconductor sector have been vibrant for more than 50 years. But we lacked the deeper supply-chain ecosystem. Today we are focused on attracting new investment at the higher end of the value chain. We’re developing data centers, including AI-layered data centers.
F&D: Malaysia’s economy withstood several shocks, including the sharp increase in energy prices caused by the Middle East war. What explains this resilience?
AHA: A lot of it comes down to policy consistency. You must be clear about where you want to go. You must be clear about government policy, both in the planning and the execution, and make it transparent so that it inspires investors with confidence.
When investors put money into Malaysia, they trust the system. They are confident that if they put money in they can get it out. The law and policy don’t change overnight, so people can take long-term investment decisions.
F&D: How can Malaysia and other midsize emerging economies navigate geoeconomic fragmentation?
AHA: I go back to our open economy. We have an export base that is diversified in manufacturing, services, mining, and so on. The export markets we sell these products to are also diversified. Multilateralism may be under threat, but it’s still possible to strike free trade deals with many places. Those deals can give you certainty about what practices are permitted, and they build a base from which to build prosperity through trade.
We are making a great effort to create better jobs that pay higher wages and to strengthen our social protection networks. This will give us a much stronger domestic market.
The more money we put into the hands of the people, the stronger and more vibrant our domestic market will become, and this will make our country more resilient.
We are also focused on “high-grading” the economy. If you look at changes like the advent of AI and the expansion of data centers, this is driving new markets around the world. For countries like Malaysia, which is a high-middle-income nation, we need to reinvent ourselves. We must innovate and focus on efficiency so that we build relevance from a global perspective. And with the connectivity we build through trade arrangements, we don’t get left behind as changes happen. We secure our future.
F&D: You have reduced the deficit substantially by curbing subsidies and increasing sales tax. How do you get public buy-in for such potentially unpopular measures?
AHA: We laid out our response with the Fiscal Responsibility Act. We said that we could not continue to sustain years of high deficits, especially after COVID, because the less fiscal space the government has the less it is able to stimulate other forms of economic activity.
When we introduced taxes, we moderated the impact on more vulnerable groups. When we increased the sales and service tax, for example, we mitigated the impact of price increases for necessities like food and water on the poorest in society.
As we created fiscal space, we not only reduced government debt but also gave back some of the savings to society. We provided better social protection, better talent management, and better training so those at lower levels of society could improve their skills.
Communication was important, tailoring intervention so that the poorest in society could manage as we carried out these reforms. And if better jobs are created, wages go up, and people’s livelihoods improve, this compensates for the difficult decisions that we must take.
We were lucky that we started the fuel price reform about two and a half years ago, when prices were much more manageable. When the Middle East crisis hit and oil prices went up, our subsidy bill went up, but only moderately.