
Over the past
decade, there has been mounting evidence that greater levels of gender
diversity can have a positive impact on corporate performance and economic
growth. Most relevant for investors, MSCI found that companies with strong
female leadership at the board level generated a return on equity 36.4
percent higher than companies without a critical mass of women on their
boards.
For both economic and social reasons, there has been a surge in interest
from investors about how they can encourage gender diversity on corporate
boards, in the C-suite, and at other levels of management. To support these
efforts, State Street and asset managers of all sizes are developing new
tools that empower investors to promote gender diversity at the companies
in which they invest.
In March 2017, we placed the “Fearless Girl” statue in the heart of New
York’s financial district to serve as the public face of our efforts to
raise awareness about the importance of gender diversity in corporate
leadership. This campaign, however, is about much more than raising
awareness.
As shareholders, we cast votes on candidates to a company’s board of
directors and other important issues facing the company. Through this proxy
voting process, we have voted against nominees to all-male boards that are
not taking adequate steps to add female representation. In addition, we are
engaging directly with companies about diversity and other thematic
environmental, social, and governance (ESG) topics and publishing thought
pieces to educate boards about effective pathways to increasing diversity
at all levels of the organization.
Since March 2017, we have called on more than 1,200 companies with no women
on their boards to take action. We are pleased that more than 300 of those
companies have now added a woman to their boards and 28 more have committed
to doing so.
But we know there is more work to be done. In September 2018, we announced
an escalation of our board diversity voting guidelines. Beginning in 2020
in the Australian, UK, and US markets and in 2021 in Canada, Japan, and
continental Europe, we will vote against the nominating committee’s entire
slate of nominees if a company does not have at least one woman on its
board and has not engaged in successful dialogue with us on the matter for
three consecutive years.
Why are we giving companies three years to implement changes that we
believe would have an immediate positive impact for investors before taking
escalated voting action? Our goal is to ensure effective independent board
leadership, which involves achieving the right skill sets as well as a
diversity of views. We realize that achieving this can’t happen overnight
and that adding qualified candidates should be a thoughtful process that
can take upward of a year.
While having only one female director on a board shouldn’t be seen as the
end of a company’s diversity journey, we believe that adding a female
perspective to the boardroom is an important first step. The Fearless Girl
campaign is about changing the mind-set of boards on diversity—moving the
conversation from “Why do we need gender diversity?” to “Why don’t we have
board diversity?”—and we believe that adding even a single female director
helps to shift this mind-set.
Diversity is a relevant issue for all companies regardless of sector,
market, or size. We found that many large companies today are making a
concerted effort to include women on their boards, but among smaller
companies the lack of female representation on boards continues to be
significant.
Most boards lacking gender diversity cite a limited pool of suitable female
director candidates as a primary obstacle. However, we believe that current
practices for nominating directors, as well as behavioral biases that
continue to undervalue the contributions of women in the workplace, are
among the leading obstacles. As an example, some boards require that all
director nominees have CEO experience.
Fortunately, these roadblocks and biases can be overcome. One best practice
commonly used by companies with higher levels of board diversity is to
ensure that every candidate pool of board nominees includes diverse
candidates. Also, we are calling on companies to monitor and disclose the
level of gender diversity not only on their boards but at all levels of
management. We believe this increased transparency will help create a
stronger pipeline of qualified female board candidates.
Inspired by a conversation we had several years ago with a client about how
to advance the gender equity discussion and capture potential excess return
from companies with gender-diverse leadership, State Street created an
index that allows investors to achieve the dual purpose of impact and
return.
Launched in March 2016, the SSGA Gender Diversity Index is designed to
promote gender diversity and harness the potential elevated returns of
companies with greater gender-diverse leadership. The index can even be
combined with a charitable component to contribute a portion of the
advisor’s revenue to support charities that focus on science, technology,
engineering, and math programs for young women.
For decades, asset owners have sought to effect change by using negative
screening, which means avoiding investing in companies whose practices
don’t align with the investor’s personal values or companies with poor ESG
ratings. Increasingly, many investors are moving beyond this exclusionary
approach and embracing ESG-focused investing as a tool for potentially
improving a portfolio’s risk-adjusted returns.
One of the biggest barriers to ESG integration is a lack of reliable and
uniform data about a company’s practices and their impact on financial
performance. We believe that our stewardship initiatives calling on
companies to improve disclosure about gender diversity at all levels of
management should play an important role in giving investors the
information they need to integrate gender considerations into their
analysis of a company.
We are pleased to observe the growing awareness of the benefits of
gender-diverse leadership across the investment ecosystem—from asset owners
to asset managers to corporations themselves. According to the Wall Street Journal, as of March 2018—the one-year anniversary of
the launch of Fearless Girl—asset managers and owners controlling more than
$13 trillion had joined us in making gender diversity a stewardship
priority.
But this is just a start. At State Street, we believe that companies
throughout the asset management industry should continually look for new
ways to use their expertise to further empower investors to promote gender
diversity at all levels of leadership around the world.