Intertemporal Substitution in Consumption Revisited
March 1, 1993
Disclaimer: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF.The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate
Summary
Some of the highly controversial questions in macroeconomics critically hinge on the value of a single parameter of consumer preference--the elasticity of intertemporal substitution. This paper provides new estimates of this parameter for individual G-7 and a panel of twenty OECD countries. We find that single equation GMM estimates are typically small and imprecise, consistent with Hall’s (1988) finding from the U.S. data. Estimation of a system of equations that takes into account the cross-equation restrictions implied by theory, however, generally gives larger and better determined values for the parameter. The panel procedure also yields relatively large estimates. Overall our multi-country results contradict the hypothesis of zero intertemporal substitution.
Subject: Consumption, Deposit rates, Econometric analysis, Estimation techniques, Financial institutions, Financial services, National accounts, Real interest rates, Treasury bills and bonds
Keywords: Consumption, consumption growth, cross-equation restriction, Deposit rates, Estimation techniques, GMM estimation, Real interest rates, return equation, Treasury bill yield, Treasury bills and bonds, utility function, WP
Pages:
26
Volume:
1993
DOI:
Issue:
026
Series:
Working Paper No. 1993/026
Stock No:
WPIEA0261993
ISBN:
9781451844306
ISSN:
1018-5941
Notes
Study based on data from individual G-7 and a panel of twenty OECD countries.






