Political Institutions and Output Collapses
IMF Working Papers, February 17, 2023
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Political Institutions and Output Collapses
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Patrick A. Imam, Jonathan R. W. Temple
- Published: February 17, 2023
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400225802.001
Summary
- Major output collapses are costly and frequent in the developing world.
- Using cross-country data, five-year periods are classified in a two-dimensional state space based on growth regimes and political institutions.
- The joint evolution of output growth and political institutions is modeled as a finite state Markov chain to study how countries move between states.
- Key empirical findings:
- Growth is more likely to be sustained under democracy than under autocracy.
- Output collapses are more persistent under autocracy.
- Stagnation under autocracy can give way to outright collapse.
- Democratic countries appear to be more resilient.
Methodology
- Data structure:
- Analysis uses cross-country data aggregated into five-year periods.
- Classification of periods into states uses a two-dimensional state space defined by growth regimes and political institutions.
- Modeling approach:
- The joint evolution of output growth and political institutions is modeled as a finite state Markov chain.
- The framework allows study of transitions between growth/institutional states, including persistence and probability of moving into collapse states.
Findings and Interpretation
- Persistence and transition patterns:
- Output collapses exhibit greater persistence under autocratic political institutions.
- Democracies show higher likelihoods of sustaining growth and greater resilience against collapse.
- Stagnation under autocracy is identified as a danger zone that can transition into outright collapse.
- Implication for developing countries:
- Political institutions are strongly associated with the dynamics of output collapse and recovery.
- Institutional regime (democracy versus autocracy) alters the risk profile for prolonged stagnation and collapse.
Policy implications (implicit from findings)
- Strengthening democratic institutions may increase the probability of sustained growth and resilience to output collapses.
- Monitoring and addressing stagnation in autocratic contexts is important because stagnation can precede collapse.
- Policies aimed at reducing the persistence of collapses under autocracy could focus on institutional reforms that enhance accountability and checks on power.
Content in this bundle
- Working Paper